All Rounders do not exist.

[Ankit_sharma03]

Just now, Khota said:

My knowledge is just fine. You are putting conditions in the definitions.

 

Listed as Allrounder.

Listed where????

So does listing him enhances his bowling ability ?? Listing mostly happens on basis of domestic for new comers......he is an all rounder for domestic doesnt mean he is an all rounder in International. 

Sehwag was all rounder for delhi....infact came in team for his off spin does that list him as an all rounder

 

Jadeja is listed as all rounder has 3 -300s in domestic does that make him all rounder- No 

 

Balls ur knowledge 

[philcric]

India has been playing international cricket for only 88 years.

 

Independent India for only 72 years.

 

 

[philcric]

We morons should stop giving chances to Kuldeep.

 

India had produced 0 chinaman bowlers in 100 88 72 years.

 

 

[Ankit_sharma03]

Guess Who saved NZ Arse from folding out on an embarrassing total - 2 all rounders

 

Specialist batsman - Munro + guptil + williamson+ taylor = 61 runs

ARs - CDGH + neesham + Santner = 166 runs and 2 of them were still not out

[zen]

Once more 

 

/thread 

 

Time to close this one

[philcric]

11 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

Guess Who saved NZ Arse from folding out on an embarrassing total - 2 all rounders

 

Specialist batsman - Munro + guptil + williamson+ taylor = 61 runs

ARs - CDGH + neesham + Santner = 166 runs and 2 of them were still not out

 

I don't give a frick about NZ.

 

NZ is a poor team. All rounders are allowed in such teams.

 

I see some progress. No mention of Pandya in a NZ-Pak match.

 

[bowl_out]

14 pages on a troll thread.. time to close this one.

[philcric]

4 minutes ago, bowl_out said:

14 pages on a troll thread.. time to close this one.

 

"All rounders don’t exist."

 

How would you define an all-rounder?

"I struggle to because no one can do that. Not possible."

 

 

 

[Khota]

11 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

Listed where????

So does listing him enhances his bowling ability ?? Listing mostly happens on basis of domestic for new comers......he is an all rounder for domestic doesnt mean he is an all rounder in International. 

Sehwag was all rounder for delhi....infact came in team for his off spin does that list him as an all rounder

 

Jadeja is listed as all rounder has 3 -300s in domestic does that make him all rounder- No 

 

Balls ur knowledge 

Go check Team India website. Shankar is listed as allrounder.

[Khota]

8 hours ago, philcric said:

 

"All rounders don’t exist."

 

How would you define an all-rounder?

"I struggle to because no one can do that. Not possible."

 

 

 

Can someone running 100m excel @ 800m. If you understand this simple logic you will go far in life.

[Ankit_sharma03]

8 hours ago, Khota said:

Go check Team India website. Shankar is listed as allrounder.

They also call jadeja an rounder after  a decade of fraud .........does that make him an all rounder. No, he is a bowler who can bat

Similarliy shankar is batsman who can bowl.......thats it. His bowling is only helpful in some condition. Stop acting like an old uncle who has been proven wrong every day and avoiding the real thing by going entirely somewere else 

[Khota]

3 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

They also call jadeja an rounder after  a decade of fraud .........does that make him an all rounder. No, he is a bowler who can bat

Similarliy shankar is batsman who can bowl.......thats it. His bowling is only helpful in some condition. Stop acting like an old uncle who has been proven wrong every day and avoiding the real thing by going entirely somewere else 

You have pent up anger issues with Jadeja go take it out on him. We are discussing Shankar and he is not an allrounder.

[Ankit_sharma03]

1 minute ago, Khota said:

You have pent up anger issues with Jadeja go take it out on him. We are discussing Shankar and he is not an allrounder.

I thought this thread is about all rounder not only vijay shankar which u have made....since most others are proving u wrong everyday 

[Khota]

3 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

I thought this thread is about all rounder not only vijay shankar which u have made....since most others are proving u wrong everyday 

Yeah Vijay just proved me wrong. I was giving him benefit of doubt that he could bat. Now I am not so sure.

[Ankit_sharma03]

2 minutes ago, Khota said:

Yeah Vijay just proved me wrong. I was giving him benefit of doubt that he could bat. Now I am not so sure.

What about neesham, colin de grandhomme, Shakib, stokes 

[Khota]

15 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

What about neesham, colin de grandhomme, Shakib, stokes 

You cannot defy the laws of biology. You cannot bat and bowl. get it. 

[Ankit_sharma03]

23 minutes ago, Khota said:

You cannot defy the laws of biology. You cannot bat and bowl. get it. 

shakib says hi 

500 runs and 10 wkts already 

 

Kaha likha ahi biology men dikha de mujhe ???

Edited June 27, 2019 by Ankit_sharma03

[Khota]

5 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

shakib says hi 

500 runs and 10 wkts already 

 

Kaha likha ahi biology men dikha de mujhe ???

So today one allrounder did not exist i.e. Shankar

 

The second allrounder consistently again was the worst bowler. Coincidence?

[Ankit_sharma03]

3 hours ago, Khota said:

So today one allrounder did not exist i.e. Shankar

 

The second allrounder consistently again was the worst bowler. Coincidence?

he is the 5th bowler and thats where ends at....he is not suppose to be better then main bowlers....

Ru kidding me Hardik's innings was the turning point 

[philcric]

Shakib, Stokes and Pandya should get tested.

 

Something wrong with their 'biology'.