Jump to content

All Rounders do not exist.


Khota

Recommended Posts

Posted
12 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

1st t20- 

BOWLING O M R W ECON 0s 4s 6s WD NB  
JJ Bumrah 4 0 16 3 4.00 18 3 0 0 0  
YS Chahal 4 0 28 1 7.00 11 3 1 0 0  
UT Yadav 4 0 35 0 8.75 8 5 0 2 0  
KH Pandya 4 0 17 1 4.25 8 0 0 0 0  
M Markande 4 0 31 0 7.75 6 2 1 0

0   

 

2nd t20- 

  • BOWLING O M R W ECON 0s 4s 6s WD NB  
    V Shankar 4 0 38 2 9.50 10 6 1 1 0  
    JJ Bumrah 4 0 30 0 7.50 6 2 1 0 0  
    S Kaul 3.4 0 45 1 12.27 6 3 3 0 1  
    YS Chahal 4 0 47 0 11.75 2 2 3 2 0  
    KH Pandya 4 0 33 0 8.25 6 3 1 1 0  
 

 

 

why did u went missing those days 

Glad you asked. T20 is a small snapshot. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

yet when they have off days u dnt fail to point out t20 stats

Do you think it was a coincidence that he yielded the most runs?

Posted
8 minutes ago, Khota said:

Do you think it was a coincidence that he yielded the most runs?

in everymatch someone wud as i said u just point out on those days when its convenient , n as i showed above u go missing other days

Posted
1 hour ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

in everymatch someone wud as i said u just point out on those days when its convenient , n as i showed above u go missing other days

When they excel please put their numbers down. 

Posted
17 hours ago, Khota said:

Some more glorious innings bt AR's. Very impressive.

 

15
27
2
0
55.55
 
23
36
1
0
63.88
 
12
25
1
0
48.00

the day they performed n it was shown to u didnt u say u aint talking about foreign all rounders 

Also did specialist make runs? whole batting failed ? 

 

as is said u just point out failure which everyone will have n go to sleep or denial on success days 

Posted
1 hour ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

the day they performed n it was shown to u didnt u say u aint talking about foreign all rounders 

Also did specialist make runs? whole batting failed ? 

 

as is said u just point out failure which everyone will have n go to sleep or denial on success days 

What does performance mean to you? They just lost the series. Is that your definition of performance.

Posted
1 hour ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

no the ODI series is a 2-2 tie

And they are soupposed to win it all. What is their ranking since you keep up with that stuff?

Posted (edited)
56 minutes ago, Khota said:

And they are soupposed to win it all. What is their ranking since you keep up with that stuff?

why are they supposed to win all ? what are they mighty aussies of 2000s

Edited by Ankit_sharma03
Posted
6 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

why are they supposed to win all ? what are they mighty aussies of 2000s

According to ICF they have the most AR and max batting depth.

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, Khota said:

According to ICF they have the most AR and max batting depth.

yes they do , but doesnt make them mighty aussie or WI whose bowling was an asset and this eng bowling is not near them.  Huge diff between good team and an invincible team . These AR have saved their Arse so many times .....when their top n middle order has struggled . 

 

Also dont other teams have all rounders. WI has holder who made a huge impact in that test series 

Edited by Ankit_sharma03
Posted
6 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

yes they do , but doesnt make them mighty aussie or WI whose bowling was an asset and this eng bowling is not near them.  Huge diff between good team and an invincible team . These AR have saved their Arse so many times .....when their top n middle order has struggled . 

 

Also dont other teams have all rounders. WI has holder who made a huge impact in that test series 

Bottom line at that level one person cannot do two things. It just does not happen in real life.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Khota said:

Bottom line at that level one person cannot do two things. It just does not happen in real life.

its been happening in cricket for ages with success n will happen for another century to , whats foolish to expect 2 ATG players in one.....if they give u utility that enough , on the contrary these all rounder have been match winners ever since cricket started n will go on

 

u have to understand the bottom line teams have been playing with them and will play with 

Edited by Ankit_sharma03
Posted
5 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

its been happening in cricket for ages with success n will happen for another century to , whats foolish to expect 2 ATG players in one.....if they give u utility that enough , on the contrary these all rounder have been match winners ever since cricket started n will go on

 

u have to understand the bottom line teams have been playing with them and will play with 

Like I said my ancestors thought earth is flat. Change comes slowly but it does come. Meanwhile did we find one?

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Khota said:

Like I said my ancestors thought earth is flat. Change comes slowly but it does come. Meanwhile did we find one?

it hasnt comes since the inception of cricket neither looks like now , look at every team filled with all rounder

India yes- we have n wait for next ten years ull see so many all rounder coming in Indian cricket 

We already have 

Hardik 

Krunal 

Shankar (batting all rounder and with time his bowling will keep developing)

 

upcoming ones

 

Anukul roy 

shivam dube 

abhishek sharma

Edited by Ankit_sharma03

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...