Is the ‘Starc, Hazelwood and Cummins’ pace attack better than ‘McGrath, Lee and Gillespie’ attack?

[Stan AF]

1 hour ago, AmreekanDesi said:

He was a dibbly dobbly bowler who owes his career to McGrath and warne 

Dude, have you even n watched him bowl?

 

Seriously why are mods encouraging such nonsense here?

[Vilander]

1 hour ago, AmreekanDesi said:

dibbly dobbly bowler 

Lol 148k to your throat from 6'5 is dibbly dobbly...ok

[Rightarmfast]

He was 150+ bowler, Gillespie! He was 2nd fastest only post Lee. 

Also Lolz at points being made about gillespie and lee being lesser than the current Aussie bowlers. People have a sense of humour :) 

[rkt.india]

31 minutes ago, Rightarmfast said:

He was 150+ bowler, Gillespie! He was 2nd fastest only post Lee. 

Also Lolz at points being made about gillespie and lee being lesser than the current Aussie bowlers. People have a sense of humour :) 

So is Starc. Cummins is faster than Gillespie.

[rkt.india]

2 hours ago, Trichromatic said:

Gillespie was a fast bowler, not even fast medium.

No. Gillespie was not out and out fast bowler. Hazlewood and Gillespie are comparable in terms of pace. Starc and Lee are comparable.  Both similar bowlers. Both could leak runs and also looked unplayable on their day.

[Stan AF]

http://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/25681140/mitchell-stark-struggles-mirror-australia-problems