zen Posted February 19, 2019 Author Share Posted February 19, 2019 2 minutes ago, Nikola said: Wait what? he don't avg that. If so even bradman won't avg 50+ leave 100. I have agreed upon him batting bit more fast like taking 4 - 5 less balls in his failures which will make impact in close games but winning or loosing will then depend if other batsman can put big score. It is not just Rohit. People have complained about SR of high avg openers like Ganguly as well At the start, when you have 10 wkts in hand and with fielding restrictions on for first 10 overs, a team can afford to take relatively more risks. If a batsman goes all out and succeeds, the team is in good position. If he gets out in doing so, you still have 9 wkts in hand. Which is why Ind may need to evaluate its approach if the par scores are high (and esp. if the bowlers go for runs) Link to comment
zen Posted February 19, 2019 Author Share Posted February 19, 2019 (edited) Ind openers in ICC and world events iew overall figures [change view] Primary team India Opposition team Australia or England or New Zealand or Pakistan or South Africa or Sri Lanka or West Indies Start of match date greater than or equal to 1 Jan 1983 Trophy Benson & Hedges World Championship of Cricket or ICC Champions Trophy (ICC KnockOut) or ICC Cricket World Cup Qualifier (ICC Trophy) or ICC Development ODI Series or ICC Super Series ODIs or ICC World Cricket League or ICC World Cricket League Championship or MRF World Series (Nehru Cup) or World Cup Batting position between 1 and 2 Qualifications runs scored greater than or equal to 250 Ordered by batting strike rate (descending) Page 1 of 1 Showing 1 - 8 of 8 First Previous Next Last Return to query menu Cleared query menu Overall figures Player Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 V Sehwag 2002-2011 18 18 2 678 126 42.37 670 101.19 1 5 1 S Dhawan 2013-2017 13 13 1 919 137 76.58 933 98.49 4 4 0 SR Tendulkar 1996-2011 31 30 0 1548 141 51.60 1778 87.06 4 9 1 SC Ganguly 1998-2007 15 15 2 869 183 66.84 1040 83.55 4 2 1 SM Gavaskar 1983-1987 9 9 1 262 103* 32.75 320 81.87 1 1 0 RG Sharma 2013-2017 13 13 0 414 91 31.84 546 75.82 0 4 2 K Srikkanth 1983-1992 29 29 2 852 93* 31.55 1208 70.52 0 7 3 RJ Shastri 1983-1992 9 9 1 281 63* 35.12 581 48.36 0 4 0 IF Rohit is going to fail vs strong teams, it could be pointless to open with him. Might as well try opening with someone like Pant, who is expected to be in the squad, in lieu of Shaw / Agarwal. Rohit can be played in the MO (and do well if he is an improved player since 2013) Doing well in bilaterals, where you can eventually cover up vs. the same opposition over a bunch of games, is good but Rohit needs to pull up his socks in key events Edited February 19, 2019 by zen Link to comment
Moochad Posted February 20, 2019 Share Posted February 20, 2019 Overall figures Player Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s RG Sharma (INDIA) 2016-2019 54 54 7 2964 208* 63.06 3045 97.33 13 11 2 265 110 S Dhawan (INDIA) 2016-2019 50 50 4 2159 132* 46.93 2200 98.13 6 12 2 282 27 DA Warner (AUS) 2016-2018 39 39 1 2064 179 54.31 1991 103.66 10 5 0 219 33 JJ Roy (ENG) 2016-2018 49 49 2 1965 180 41.80 1824 107.73 5 9 4 224 39 Q de Kock (SA) 2016-2019 45 45 2 1887 178 43.88 1917 98.43 4 11 2 214 36 HM Amla (SA) 2016-2019 46 46 2 1707 154 38.79 1938 88.08 5 8 2 191 15 MJ Guptill (NZ) 2016-2019 40 40 2 1680 180* 44.21 1834 91.60 5 7 3 169 55 AJ Finch (AUS) 2016-2019 43 42 0 1540 124 36.66 1688 91.23 5 9 2 152 40 JM Bairstow (ENG) 2017-2018 27 27 3 1265 141* 52.70 1151 109.90 5 2 1 148 26 AD Hales (ENG) 2016-2018 28 28 2 1169 171 44.96 1194 97.90 4 7 3 136 21 N Dickwella (SL) 2017-2019 30 29 0 985 95 33.96 985 100.00 0 8 0 119 11 Fakhar Zaman (PAK) 2017-2019 23 23 1 902 114 41.00 1000 90.20 1 7 1 107 14 WU Tharanga (SL) 2017-2018 21 20 1 731 119 38.47 799 91.48 2 3 2 93 12 C Munro (NZ) 2017-2019 26 26 0 658 87 25.30 596 110.40 0 4 4 82 19 Last 3 yrs, openers who have played min 20 innings vs top 8 teams. Nitpicking his slow start in PP, doesn't override the fact that his overall is 97+ and it is a meaningless criticism unless the same analysis is done for the other comparable openers IMO. 63 @ 97 with 13 hundreds = match winner. manu4411 and Nikola 2 Link to comment
zen Posted February 20, 2019 Author Share Posted February 20, 2019 14 minutes ago, Moochad said: Overall figures Player Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s RG Sharma (INDIA) 2016-2019 54 54 7 2964 208* 63.06 3045 97.33 13 11 2 265 110 S Dhawan (INDIA) 2016-2019 50 50 4 2159 132* 46.93 2200 98.13 6 12 2 282 27 DA Warner (AUS) 2016-2018 39 39 1 2064 179 54.31 1991 103.66 10 5 0 219 33 JJ Roy (ENG) 2016-2018 49 49 2 1965 180 41.80 1824 107.73 5 9 4 224 39 Q de Kock (SA) 2016-2019 45 45 2 1887 178 43.88 1917 98.43 4 11 2 214 36 HM Amla (SA) 2016-2019 46 46 2 1707 154 38.79 1938 88.08 5 8 2 191 15 MJ Guptill (NZ) 2016-2019 40 40 2 1680 180* 44.21 1834 91.60 5 7 3 169 55 AJ Finch (AUS) 2016-2019 43 42 0 1540 124 36.66 1688 91.23 5 9 2 152 40 JM Bairstow (ENG) 2017-2018 27 27 3 1265 141* 52.70 1151 109.90 5 2 1 148 26 AD Hales (ENG) 2016-2018 28 28 2 1169 171 44.96 1194 97.90 4 7 3 136 21 N Dickwella (SL) 2017-2019 30 29 0 985 95 33.96 985 100.00 0 8 0 119 11 Fakhar Zaman (PAK) 2017-2019 23 23 1 902 114 41.00 1000 90.20 1 7 1 107 14 WU Tharanga (SL) 2017-2018 21 20 1 731 119 38.47 799 91.48 2 3 2 93 12 C Munro (NZ) 2017-2019 26 26 0 658 87 25.30 596 110.40 0 4 4 82 19 Last 3 yrs, openers who have played min 20 innings vs top 8 teams. Nitpicking his slow start in PP, doesn't override the fact that his overall is 97+ and it is a meaningless criticism unless the same analysis is done for the other comparable openers IMO. 63 @ 97 with 13 hundreds = match winner. Great but do you think ppl who can dive into stats do not have this basic info? The discussion is meant to start after considering what you have posted And for analysis on other players, you would need to read the thread Link to comment
Moochad Posted February 20, 2019 Share Posted February 20, 2019 31 minutes ago, zen said: Great but do you think ppl who can dive into stats do not have this basic info? The discussion is meant to start after considering what you have posted And for analysis on other players, you would need to read the thread I had read the thread, and nothing in it addresses what I said There is no similar analysis of the other players in this thread, only of Rohit's SRs below 50 runs, between 50-100 runs, and over 100 runs from the cricinfo article. Who is there to compare to if we don't have the same data for other players? There also isn't a comparison of what the avg PP score for the different teams are over the last 4 yrs. If no comparison is given, how do we know we are going slower than other teams or that he is going slower than the other top ODI openers in the PP, who I listed? Apart from Warner or Bairstow, who is a dasher at top exactly? Roy hardly averages 41. Overall our batting is 2nd highest in RPO the last 3 yrs. Overall figures Team Span Mat Won Lost Tied NR W/L Ave RPO Inns HS LS England 2016-2019 56 38 13 1 3 2.923 42.02 6.21 55 481 153 India 2016-2019 62 41 19 1 1 2.157 47.54 5.83 62 392 92 South Africa 2016-2019 51 29 21 0 1 1.380 36.88 5.70 51 384 118 Australia 2016-2019 58 24 32 0 2 0.750 32.90 5.70 57 378 142 New Zealand 2016-2019 51 27 21 0 3 1.285 31.86 5.51 51 371 79 Pakistan 2016-2019 43 19 23 0 1 0.826 34.74 5.32 43 338 74 Sri Lanka 2016-2019 48 7 37 1 3 0.189 26.89 5.27 46 366 103 West Indies 2016-2019 37 7 26 1 2 0.269 25.60 5.06 34 356 104 Eng is higher, but look at their stats By host country Team Span Mat Won Lost Tied NR W/L Ave RPO Inns HS LS England 2017-2017 3 1 2 0 0 0.500 45.08 6.91 3 366 - in India England 2016-2018 29 22 4 1 2 5.500 47.47 6.39 29 481 153 in England England 2016-2016 5 2 3 0 0 0.666 35.19 6.17 5 399 236 in South Africa England 2018-2018 5 3 2 0 0 1.500 38.44 5.92 5 335 234 in New Zealand England 2018-2018 5 3 1 0 1 3.000 31.48 5.75 5 278 - in Sri Lanka England 2017-2019 4 3 0 0 0 - 38.63 5.73 3 328 328 in West Indies England 2018-2018 5 4 1 0 0 4.000 36.18 5.68 5 308 196 in Australia basically bullying at home on flat tracks make it look like their batting is so much better than it is. Link to comment
zen Posted February 20, 2019 Author Share Posted February 20, 2019 (edited) 13 minutes ago, Moochad said: I had read the thread, and nothing in it addresses what I said There is no similar analysis of the other players in this thread, only of Rohit's SRs below 50 runs, between 50-100 runs, and over 100 runs from the cricinfo article. Who is there to compare to if we don't have the same data for other players? There also isn't a comparison of what the avg PP score for the different teams are over the last 4 yrs. If no comparison is given, how do we know we are going slower than other teams or that he is going slower than the other top ODI openers in the PP, who I listed? Apart from Warner or Bairstow, who is a dasher at top exactly? Roy hardly averages 41. Overall our batting is 2nd highest in RPO the last 3 yrs. Overall figures Team Span Mat Won Lost Tied NR W/L Ave RPO Inns HS LS England 2016-2019 56 38 13 1 3 2.923 42.02 6.21 55 481 153 India 2016-2019 62 41 19 1 1 2.157 47.54 5.83 62 392 92 South Africa 2016-2019 51 29 21 0 1 1.380 36.88 5.70 51 384 118 Australia 2016-2019 58 24 32 0 2 0.750 32.90 5.70 57 378 142 New Zealand 2016-2019 51 27 21 0 3 1.285 31.86 5.51 51 371 79 Pakistan 2016-2019 43 19 23 0 1 0.826 34.74 5.32 43 338 74 Sri Lanka 2016-2019 48 7 37 1 3 0.189 26.89 5.27 46 366 103 West Indies 2016-2019 37 7 26 1 2 0.269 25.60 5.06 34 356 104 Eng is higher, but look at their stats By host country Team Span Mat Won Lost Tied NR W/L Ave RPO Inns HS LS England 2017-2017 3 1 2 0 0 0.500 45.08 6.91 3 366 - in India England 2016-2018 29 22 4 1 2 5.500 47.47 6.39 29 481 153 in England England 2016-2016 5 2 3 0 0 0.666 35.19 6.17 5 399 236 in South Africa England 2018-2018 5 3 2 0 0 1.500 38.44 5.92 5 335 234 in New Zealand England 2018-2018 5 3 1 0 1 3.000 31.48 5.75 5 278 - in Sri Lanka England 2017-2019 4 3 0 0 0 - 38.63 5.73 3 328 328 in West Indies England 2018-2018 5 4 1 0 0 4.000 36.18 5.68 5 308 196 in Australia basically bullying at home on flat tracks make it look like their batting is so much better than it is. Why are you reading just the OP when a variety of info is scattered on the thread. The info which is good enough to throw the light on the situation (includes how other openers play, Rohit’s performance in world events in relation to other Indian openers (which is just above the first post you made) and so on (unless it is difficult to put 2+2 together) And this is about optimizing for the WC, which is in Eng (home for Eng, not in Japan) Edited February 20, 2019 by zen Link to comment
wanted_desi Posted February 20, 2019 Share Posted February 20, 2019 Rohit Sharma is one of the most overrated ODI batsman ever to play the game. I mean, he is pretty good batsman, but he is perceived as one of the all time greats. My take on that is that if you are in that league, you can never be a liability. Rohit Sharma is liability every time he scores less than 50, which happens quite often. zen 1 Link to comment
zen Posted February 20, 2019 Author Share Posted February 20, 2019 38 minutes ago, wanted_desi said: Rohit Sharma is one of the most overrated ODI batsman ever to play the game. I mean, he is pretty good batsman, but he is perceived as one of the all time greats. My take on that is that if you are in that league, you can never be a liability. Rohit Sharma is liability every time he scores less than 50, which happens quite often. Add to that his poor record in ICC world events, where you have to play different teams .... He also appears to cash-in in bilaterals or where you play same teams on multiple occasions Link to comment
maniac Posted February 20, 2019 Share Posted February 20, 2019 5 minutes ago, zen said: Add to that his poor record in ICC world events, where you have to play different teams .... He also appears to cash-in in bilaterals or where you play same teams on multiple occasions Man of the match CT Semifinals, Man of the Match WC Quarterfinals, Man of the Match WT20 2007 must win game against SA,Invaluable 30(16) WT20 2007 Finals which India won by just 5 runs. Nikola and sarcastic 2 Link to comment
zen Posted February 20, 2019 Author Share Posted February 20, 2019 (edited) 4 minutes ago, maniac said: Man of the match CT Semifinals, Man of the Match WC Quarterfinals, Man of the Match WT20 2007 must win game against SA,Invaluable 30(16) WT20 2007 Finals which India won by just 5 runs. Good. But overall only avgs 32 with a SR of 76 in ODI events, which is how openers played in 80s Note that with the opportunities and backing that Rohit has received, he is expected to perform better (I am sure he would have some good performances here and there) Edited February 20, 2019 by zen Link to comment
Nikola Posted February 20, 2019 Share Posted February 20, 2019 3 minutes ago, zen said: Good. But overall only avgs 32 with a SR of 76 in ODI events, which is how openers played in 80s Note that with the opportunities and backing that Rohit has received, he is expected to perform better (I am sure he would have some good performances here and there) Oh yeah was 2nd most run scorer in 2013 & 2017 ct. Scored 2nd most runs for india in 2015 worldcup and scored imp century in knock out match. Link to comment
maniac Posted February 20, 2019 Share Posted February 20, 2019 2 minutes ago, zen said: Good. But overall only avgs 32 with a SR of 76 in ODI events, which is how openers played in 80s Note that with the opportunities and backing that Rohit has received, he is expected to perform better (I am sure he would have some good performances here and there) Numbers and stats always don't give the picture. For example that SA game where India would have been knocked out,he scored a 50 with a S/R of 125.00 which is mediocre for a T20 game if you don't look at the context. The bowling attack of SA was Pollock,Ntini,Philander and M.Morkel. I would go as far as saying that innings was the moment of conception of the IPL with Misbah's scoop shot being the actual delivery date. Link to comment
zen Posted February 20, 2019 Author Share Posted February 20, 2019 (edited) 7 minutes ago, maniac said: Numbers and stats always don't give the picture. For example that SA game where India would have been knocked out,he scored a 50 with a S/R of 125.00 which is mediocre for a T20 game if you don't look at the context. The bowling attack of SA was Pollock,Ntini,Philander and M.Morkel. I would go as far as saying that innings was the moment of conception of the IPL with Misbah's scoop shot being the actual delivery date. But you are using T20s. This thread is focused on optimizing for WC considering par scores of above 300 .... Despite the past achievements that you listed in T20s, in 2019 he may not be a good choice for a spot in T20s PS Note that I am a Rohit supporter (not in your league but a mild one) Edited February 20, 2019 by zen Link to comment
maniac Posted February 20, 2019 Share Posted February 20, 2019 Just now, zen said: But you are using T20s. This thread is focused on optimizing for WC considering par scores of above 300 .... Despite the past achievements that you listed in T20s, in 2019 he may not be a good choice for a spot in T20s He was one of the top scorers in Nzl and Australia as well. I would be more concerned about Dhawan's form and Kohli's record in knockouts. Rohit is fine. Link to comment
zen Posted February 20, 2019 Author Share Posted February 20, 2019 (edited) 2 minutes ago, maniac said: He was one of the top scorers in Nzl and Australia as well. I would be more concerned about Dhawan's form and Kohli's record in knockouts. Rohit is fine. what will it take for you to know that it may not be fine or someone could perform relatively better? Edited February 20, 2019 by zen Link to comment
Moochad Posted February 20, 2019 Share Posted February 20, 2019 13 minutes ago, zen said: Why are you reading just the OP when a variety of info is scattered on the thread. The info which is good enough to throw the light on the situation (includes how other openers play, Rohit’s performance in world events in relation to other Indian openers (which is just above the first post you made) and so on (unless it is difficult to put 2+2 together) Why do you keep alleging that others haven't read the thread when they have? It's possible for someone to not find the rest of the info isn't 'good enough' and unconvincing. Nothing addresses what I asked. Where is evidence that Rohit goes appreciably slower than other top ODI openers in the PP? Your own posted stats contradict that premise... On 2/18/2019 at 1:49 PM, zen said: Avg and SR of openers from the top 5 teams since 2017 View overall figures [change view] Primary team Australia or England or India or New Zealand or South Africa Start of match date greater than or equal to 1 JAN 2017 Runs scored less than or equal to 49 Batting position between 1 and 2 Qualifications runs scored greater than or equal to 200 Ordered by batting strike rate (descending) Page 1 of 1 Showing 1 - 10 of 10 First Previous Next Last Return to query menu Cleared query menu Overall figures Player Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s C Munro (NZ) 2017-2019 22 22 0 382 49 17.36 380 100.52 0 0 4 48 10 S Dhawan (INDIA) 2017-2019 33 33 0 693 49 21.00 762 90.94 0 0 2 104 8 JM Bairstow (ENG) 2017-2018 20 20 1 504 44 26.52 560 90.00 0 0 1 63 8 DA Warner (AUS) 2017-2018 14 14 1 278 42 21.38 321 86.60 0 0 0 31 2 AK Markram (SA) 2018-2018 7 7 0 214 42 30.57 254 84.25 0 0 0 30 3 JJ Roy (ENG) 2017-2018 28 28 0 492 49 17.57 587 83.81 0 0 4 63 8 HM Amla (SA) 2017-2019 23 23 0 457 43 19.86 567 80.59 0 0 1 61 2 Q de Kock (SA) 2017-2019 20 20 0 425 47 21.25 555 76.57 0 0 2 42 2 MJ Guptill (NZ) 2017-2019 20 20 0 392 48 19.60 535 73.27 0 0 1 45 7 RG Sharma (INDIA) 2017-2019 26 26 0 330 48 12.69 527 62.61 0 0 2 31 11 this is not about “is Rohit bad”. This is about making the best of PP on good batting tracks Since Rohit avg 13 at a SR of 65 most of the time. Ind is wasting PPs to a certain extent in most of its games. If we take your 21 balls, by the time he gets out 7-8 overs are gone. Where you would expect to go at 7-8 RPO at least. So instead of being 50 after 7 with 3 PP remaining on good batting tracks, India would be much less (with others having to take more risks with fewer wkts in hand). The new batsman coming in unlikely to take risk immediately with 1 wkt down. At 50-1 after 7, Ind has at least started on the right foot. If Ind is 50-0, it is even bette The cricinfo article you posted Rohit's stats from show at a 77-80 SR. It gives noone elses stats. The data u use to infer that Rohit has a SR of 65 'most of the time', show that every opener in the World except Munro goes below a 100 SR/ 6 RPO, when below 50. (That too with Munro's avg being a paltry 25. Rohit on the other hand avgs 60+) Only Dhawan and Bairstow go above 90 and avg above 45 at the same time according to the data u give and even those which translates only to 5.4 RPO. So Rohit, who goes 77-80 according to the cricinfo article, goes the same rate range as Guptil, De Kock, and Roy (all between 75-85)it is bad, even though the same Rohit, as shown by cricinfo article, as soon as he crosses 50 goes 107+ SR and has an avg of 60+? Where are these openers who meet this 7-8 RPO standard. That is the equivalent of a 116-130 SR, when they are below 50? Your stats show there are none. When someone gives you a 5 and a 2 and tells you they make a 4, it will never add up And yes, this comes off as a bash Rohit thread when so many random filters are applied to search for numbers that show Rohit in a bad light. Here are his actual numbers Records type batting analysis [change type] View series averages [change view] Trophy ICC Champions Trophy (ICC KnockOut) or World Cup Ordered by start date (ascending) Return to query menu Cleared query menu Career averages Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s unfiltered 2007-2019 201 195 31 7808 264 47.60 8840 88.32 22 39 12 681 215 Profile filtered 2013-2017 18 18 2 811 137 50.68 943 86.00 2 6 2 84 17 Series averages Series Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s Start Date Winner ICC Champions Trophy (in England), 2013 5 5 0 177 65 35.40 233 75.96 0 2 0 22 1 6 Jun 2013 India ICC Cricket World Cup (in Australia/New Zealand), 2014/15 8 8 1 330 137 47.14 360 91.66 1 2 1 33 9 15 Feb 2015 Australia ICC Champions Trophy (in England), 2017 5 5 1 304 123* 76.00 350 86.85 1 2 1 29 7 4 Jun 2017 Pakistan Quote And this is about optimizing for the WC, which is in Eng (home for Eng, not in Japan) Apparently the point was missed. India, has the 2nd highest RPO in the world over the last 3 years already(as I posted above). Only England is higher, but their RPO is inflated by their home vs away record. At home they have an RPO of 6.4, in most other countries it is below a 6. This implies to me that their RPO advantage over the #2 team India is overstated by their flat home tracks. Your post shows India in a poor light in England based off a grand total of of 3 matches that India has played in England in 2018. If you extend it back to include the CT , then India's RPO jumps all the way from 5.42 to 5.71, from 7 matches rather than 3. Quote In the same period, other teams vs Eng (min 2 games) View overall figures [change view] Opposition team England Home or away away (home of opposition) Start of match date greater than or equal to 1 Jan 2016 Totals in terms of batting team Qualifications matches played greater than or equal to 2 Ordered by average runs per six balls (descending) Page 1 of 1 Showing 1 - 7 of 7 First Previous Next Last Return to query menu Cleared query menu Overall figures Team Span Mat Won Lost Tied NR W/L Ave RPO Inns HS LS South Africa 2017-2017 3 1 2 0 0 0.500 41.72 6.06 3 328 267 West Indies 2017-2017 5 0 4 0 1 0.000 36.43 6.03 4 356 245 Australia 2017-2018 6 0 6 0 0 0.000 27.17 5.82 6 310 205 Pakistan 2016-2017 6 2 4 0 0 0.500 36.95 5.58 6 304 251 Sri Lanka 2016-2016 5 0 3 1 1 0.000 32.37 5.51 5 305 202 India 2018-2018 3 1 2 0 0 0.500 38.05 5.42 3 269 236 Ireland 2017-2017 2 0 2 0 0 0.000 18.45 4.66 2 243 126 View by host country [change view] Primary team Australia or England or India or New Zealand or Pakistan or South Africa or Sri Lanka or West Indies Opposition team Australia or England or India or New Zealand or Pakistan or South Africa or Sri Lanka or West Indies Host country England Start of match date greater than or equal to 1 Jan 2016 Totals in terms of batting team Ordered by average runs per six balls (descending) Page 1 of 1 Showing 1 - 8 of 8 First Previous Next Last Return to query menu Cleared query menu By host country Team Span Mat Won Lost Tied NR W/L Ave RPO Inns HS LS England 2016-2018 29 22 4 1 2 5.500 47.47 6.39 29 481 153 in England West Indies 2017-2017 5 0 4 0 1 0.000 36.43 6.03 4 356 245 in England Australia 2017-2018 7 0 6 0 1 0.000 26.70 5.82 7 310 205 in England New Zealand 2017-2017 2 0 1 0 1 0.000 25.70 5.74 2 291 223 in England India 2017-2018 7 3 4 0 0 0.750 42.73 5.71 7 321 158 in England Pakistan 2016-2017 10 5 5 0 0 1.000 37.07 5.55 10 338 164 in England Sri Lanka 2016-2017 8 1 5 1 1 0.200 32.63 5.49 8 322 202 in England South Africa 2017-2017 6 2 4 0 0 0.500 34.76 5.44 6 328 191 in England Nikola and manu4411 2 Link to comment
Nikola Posted February 20, 2019 Share Posted February 20, 2019 ^^ Agreed. There is one thing to show real stats and other thing trying to prove your point by showing any random stats. This guy has reached below level in that. Link to comment
zen Posted February 20, 2019 Author Share Posted February 20, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, Moochad said: Why do you keep alleging that others haven't read the thread when they have? It's possible for someone to not find the rest of the info isn't 'good enough' and unconvincing. Ok. Good to know that you read the thread! Quote Nothing addresses what I asked. Where is evidence that Rohit goes appreciably slower than other top ODI openers in the PP? Your own posted stats contradict that premise... The cricinfo article you posted Rohit's stats from show at a 77-80 SR. It gives noone elses stats. The data u use to infer that Rohit has a SR of 65 'most of the time', show that every opener in the World except Munro goes below a 100 SR/ 6 RPO, when below 50. (That too with Munro's avg being a paltry 25. Rohit on the other hand avgs 60+) Only Dhawan and Bairstow go above 90 and avg above 45 at the same time according to the data u give and even those which translates only to 5.4 RPO. So Rohit, who goes 77-80 according to the cricinfo article, goes the same rate range as Guptil, De Kock, and Roy (all between 75-85)it is bad, even though the same Rohit, as shown by cricinfo article, as soon as he crosses 50 goes 107+ SR and has an avg of 60+? Where are these openers who meet this 7-8 RPO standard. That is the equivalent of a 116-130 SR, when they are below 50? Your stats show there are none. When someone gives you a 5 and a 2 and tells you they make a 4, it will never add up The point of the thread is to optimize the PP by playing someone who can quickly get off the mark (this does not imply that Rohit is dropped) From the OP: "Question 1. In 2019 WC, where par scores are expected to be 300+, Can Ind afford to waste PPs overs in possibly 6 of the 9 group games? Discuss" Quote And yes, this comes off as a bash Rohit thread when so many random filters are applied to search for numbers that show Rohit in a bad light. Here are his actual numbers Records type batting analysis [change type] View series averages [change view] Trophy ICC Champions Trophy (ICC KnockOut) or World Cup Ordered by start date (ascending) Return to query menu Cleared query menu Career averages Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s unfiltered 2007-2019 201 195 31 7808 264 47.60 8840 88.32 22 39 12 681 215 Profile filtered 2013-2017 18 18 2 811 137 50.68 943 86.00 2 6 2 84 17 Series averages Series Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s Start Date Winner ICC Champions Trophy (in England), 2013 5 5 0 177 65 35.40 233 75.96 0 2 0 22 1 6 Jun 2013 India ICC Cricket World Cup (in Australia/New Zealand), 2014/15 8 8 1 330 137 47.14 360 91.66 1 2 1 33 9 15 Feb 2015 Australia ICC Champions Trophy (in England), 2017 5 5 1 304 123* 76.00 350 86.85 1 2 1 29 7 4 Jun 2017 Pakistan I clearly listed ICC and world events (can understand why a fanboy would have problems with that ). And using your filters, it only proves the point made in OP Vs SENA+WI Records type batting analysis [change type] View series averages [change view] Opposition team Australia or England or New Zealand or South Africa or West Indies Trophy ICC Champions Trophy (ICC KnockOut) or World Cup Ordered by start date (ascending) Return to query menu Cleared query menu Career averages Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s unfiltered 2007-2019 201 195 31 7808 264 47.60 8840 88.32 22 39 12 681 215 Profile filtered 2013-2017 7 7 0 179 65 25.57 243 73.66 0 2 1 19 4 If you throw Pak to the mix (that is 6 major teams now): Records type batting analysis [change type] View series averages [change view] Opposition team Australia or England or New Zealand or Pakistan or South Africa or West Indies Trophy ICC Champions Trophy (ICC KnockOut) or World Cup Ordered by start date (ascending) Return to query menu Cleared query menu Career averages Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s unfiltered 2007-2019 201 195 31 7808 264 47.60 8840 88.32 22 39 12 681 215 Profile filtered 2013-2017 11 11 0 303 91 27.54 417 72.66 0 3 2 30 6 From the OP, which you read: "Applying this to the WC Group Games 1. Could go with a SR of 80 or less in 6 of the 9 games (And this 6 games could be vs major teams) 2. Could hit 2 50s where his SR could be 100+ (Could be vs. SL and Pak) 3. Could hit 1 100 at a phenomenal SR (Could be vs BD) " Quote Apparently the point was missed. India, has the 2nd highest RPO in the world over the last 3 years already(as I posted above). Only England is higher, but their RPO is inflated by their home vs away record. At home they have an RPO of 6.4, in most other countries it is below a 6. This implies to me that their RPO advantage over the #2 team India is overstated by their flat home tracks. The tracks are expected to be flat in Eng. And therefore the need to optimize the PP Quote Your post shows India in a poor light in England based off a grand total of of 3 matches that India has played in England in 2018. If you extend it back to include the CT , then India's RPO jumps all the way from 5.42 to 5.71, from 7 matches rather than 3. Irrelevant. The thread assumes par scores of 300+, 320 if you go by 6.4 . (I thought you "read" the thread) PS So what are you trying to debate? (if it is that analysis and views should align with what Rohit fanboys dream about him, it is being too optimistic. May be also ask the university professor to give questions you can answer in exams) Edited February 20, 2019 by zen Link to comment
zen Posted February 20, 2019 Author Share Posted February 20, 2019 To summarize the key info from the post above: In ICC events vs SENA+WI Records type batting analysis [change type] View series averages [change view] Opposition team Australia or England or New Zealand or South Africa or West Indies Trophy ICC Champions Trophy (ICC KnockOut) or World Cup Ordered by start date (ascending) Return to query menu Cleared query menu Career averages Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s unfiltered 2007-2019 201 195 31 7808 264 47.60 8840 88.32 22 39 12 681 215 Profile filtered 2013-2017 7 7 0 179 65 25.57 243 73.66 0 2 1 19 4 If you throw Pak to the mix (that is 6 major teams now): Records type batting analysis [change type] View series averages [change view] Opposition team Australia or England or New Zealand or Pakistan or South Africa or West Indies Trophy ICC Champions Trophy (ICC KnockOut) or World Cup Ordered by start date (ascending) Return to query menu Cleared query menu Career averages Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s unfiltered 2007-2019 201 195 31 7808 264 47.60 8840 88.32 22 39 12 681 215 Profile filtered 2013-2017 11 11 0 303 91 27.54 417 72.66 0 3 2 30 6 Link to comment
zen Posted February 20, 2019 Author Share Posted February 20, 2019 And where Rohit stands at ICC events SENA+WI View overall figures [change view] Primary team India Opposition team Australia or England or New Zealand or South Africa or West Indies Start of match date greater than or equal to 1 Jan 2013 Trophy ICC Champions Trophy (ICC KnockOut) or World Cup Qualifications runs scored greater than or equal to 100 Ordered by batting average (descending) Page 1 of 1 Showing 1 - 6 of 6 First Previous Next Last Return to query menu Cleared query menu Overall figures Player Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s S Dhawan 2013-2017 7 7 1 516 137 86.00 509 101.37 3 1 0 59 7 AM Rahane 2015-2015 3 3 0 137 79 45.66 162 84.56 0 1 0 11 3 V Kohli 2013-2017 7 7 1 252 76* 42.00 303 83.16 0 1 0 25 2 MS Dhoni 2013-2017 7 5 1 155 65 38.75 162 95.67 0 1 1 12 3 RA Jadeja 2013-2017 7 5 2 111 47* 37.00 98 113.26 0 0 0 13 3 RG Sharma 2013-2017 7 7 0 179 65 25.57 243 73.66 0 2 1 19 4 If you throw Pak in to the mix (6 major teams) View overall figures [change view] Primary team India Opposition team Australia or England or New Zealand or Pakistan or South Africa or West Indies Start of match date greater than or equal to 1 Jan 2013 Trophy ICC Champions Trophy (ICC KnockOut) or World Cup Qualifications runs scored greater than or equal to 100 Ordered by batting average (descending) Page 1 of 1 Showing 1 - 7 of 7 First Previous Next Last Return to query menu Cleared query menu Overall figures Player Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s S Dhawan 2013-2017 11 11 1 726 137 72.60 713 101.82 3 3 0 81 9 V Kohli 2013-2017 11 11 3 467 107 58.37 533 87.61 1 2 0 42 5 AM Rahane 2015-2015 4 4 0 137 79 34.25 163 84.04 0 1 1 11 3 MS Dhoni 2013-2017 11 7 1 177 65 29.50 191 92.67 0 1 1 13 4 RG Sharma 2013-2017 11 11 0 303 91 27.54 417 72.66 0 3 2 30 6 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now