EnterTheVoid Posted September 5, 2023 Posted September 5, 2023 Pushback in the region against the Blasphemy law. Civil unrest. They rather join India.
Lone Wolf Posted September 5, 2023 Posted September 5, 2023 17 minutes ago, EnterTheVoid said: Pushback in the region against the Blasphemy law. Civil unrest. They rather join India. Shia Cleric got accused of Blasphemy & arrested... Locals demanding to open Kargil Skardu road lol
EnterTheVoid Posted September 5, 2023 Author Posted September 5, 2023 10 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said: Shia Cleric got accused of Blasphemy & arrested... Locals demanding to open Kargil Skardu road lol The Blasphemy law is the gift that keeps on giving. if Gilgit joins India on it's own accord, nothing like it. What a time to be alive!
Lone Wolf Posted September 5, 2023 Posted September 5, 2023 1 hour ago, EnterTheVoid said: The Blasphemy law is the gift that keeps on giving. if Gilgit joins India on it's own accord, nothing like it. What a time to be alive! It won't join India.. Unless we invade Pakistan. We have seen these unrests before. Need to start pushing from our side... Get Shia nations like Iran on our side & raise these issues on world forums. Don't think Indian Govt. Is interested in PoK in short term. Maybe after 2030.
coffee_rules Posted September 5, 2023 Posted September 5, 2023 (edited) Indian intersts should be in Gilgit and Balouch purely by proxy and not by any occupation, two areas that were gifted to Pakistan without them demanding before partition. Call it Congressi lack of strategic interests post 1945. They were busy coaxing Jinnah not to go for Pakistan, while British backstabbed India in Gilgit .https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/the-story-of-gilgit-baltistan-pm-modi-balochistan-india-pakistan-2981634/lite/ Edited September 5, 2023 by coffee_rules nevada and ravishingravi 2
Lone Wolf Posted September 5, 2023 Posted September 5, 2023 18 minutes ago, coffee_rules said: Indian intersts should be in Gilgit and Balouch purely by proxy and not by any occupation, two areas that were gifted to Pakistan without them demanding before partition. Call it Congressi lack of strategic interests post 1945. They were busy coaxing Jinnah not to go for Pakistan, while British backstabbed India in Gilgit .https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/the-story-of-gilgit-baltistan-pm-modi-balochistan-india-pakistan-2981634/lite/ Gilgit & Chitral were Pro Pakistan even before Partition... Even Poonch in modern day JK.. There was a Poonch rebellion as well. We came up with decent chunk of land in the end. Full blown Kashmir war would go onto late 50's
coffee_rules Posted September 5, 2023 Posted September 5, 2023 13 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said: Gilgit & Chitral were Pro Pakistan even before Partition... Even Poonch in modern day JK.. There was a Poonch rebellion as well. We came up with decent chunk of land in the end. Full blown Kashmir war would go onto late 50's People support us a different matter. I am talking of armed forces, British helped conquer Gilgit due to thwart any Russian interests.Balochistan wanted to merge with India, Nehru was like how can a country border be bifurcated? Later, they did get East and West Pakistan across different regions
Recommended Posts