Ha ha ha ha ha ha!!! Let's all laugh at the padosis :)

[Khota]

50 minutes ago, Finer said:

So you are calling BCCI begging board? Surely you know by now that it is BCCI that begs ICC to schedule their match with Pakistan in advance especially in every stage group of ICC so they can claim the bigger pie?

Without Pakistan, BCCI will get similar pie as the rest of cricket boards do. It is Pakistan-India that sells. Without Pakistan, there is no rivalry. Should i say ignorance knows no bound?

 

 

We are making plenty of money without Pakistan. Get rid of your delusions. We are doing fine without you. You are like my neighbors chicken. You are taking credit for sun rise.

[Khota]

delete.

Edited June 23, 2017 by Khota

[SUMO]

suspend this thread till we beat them or they get beaten badly by someone.

[mishra]

Just now, SUMO said:

suspend this thread till we beat them or they get beaten badly by someone.

Or next time they play against Afghanistan or Ireland

[bones]

6 hours ago, Tendu_10 said:

 

Pakistan deserve the share of what they bring to the table. If Pak can generate more revenue then yes it should be given a greater slice of the pie.

 

Pak has double the amount of population than eng n aus combined. The fact Pak is in such dire straits isnt anyone elses fault but Paks.

 

ICC shouldnt give handouts to any nation just for the sake of it.

 

World isnt a charity.

 

No wonder Pakistanis abroad support socialist loonies like that nutbag Corbyn.

 

all want something for free.

 

Before this post I thought you were a troll, now I know you're not. You're a monkey without a clue.

 

Firstly, population doesn't quite equate to economical success (GDP for example). If that was a factor, China and India would be at the top of the pile, they're not.

 

I agree on that Pakistan shouldn't get half of the money if they play a bilateral series, but they should get a fair amount. If more people watch from an Indian perspective because India are playing their chief sporting rivals, then surely that should be considered a factor when sorting out the finances.

 

You mention Pakistanis supporting Corbyn. I'm not sure how you come to that conclusion, they make up 1.2 million of the 64million in the UK, even if every single one of those 1.2 million was eligible to vote (some aren't due to nationality status and/or age) then there's still millions more votes required to add up to the figure that Labour had this general election.

 

Also you really shouldn't speak about things you have no idea about. Here in the UK people aren't voting for the leaders, they are voting for parties and it just so happens that Corbyn is a leader of one of those parties. Corbyn might go, but his party will continue.

[mishra]

8 hours ago, Finer said:

That means nothing. If Pakistan starts winning hockey in WC, then you can expect the similar celebration. The next day, all is forgotten. Besides, the promotion of cricket is mainly aimed at the demographic of Indians hence the batsman dominated policy which imbalances the challenge between bat and ball. In the future, the policy could only worsen which will decrease the interest of Pakistan since Pakistan cricket is mainly about fast bowlers and spinners which many are effective due to old ball that is no longer there in the limited format.

Big Iff. we beat you there too 7-1 was scoreline.   killed it.

[Tendu_10]

Before this post I thought you were a troll, now I know you're not. You're a monkey without a clue.

 

Firstly, population doesn't quite equate to economical success (GDP for example). If that was a factor, China and India would be at the top of the pile, they're not.

 

I agree on that Pakistan shouldn't get half of the money if they play a bilateral series, but they should get a fair amount. If more people watch from an Indian perspective because India are playing their chief sporting rivals, then surely that should be considered a factor when sorting out the finances.

 

You mention Pakistanis supporting Corbyn. I'm not sure how you come to that conclusion, they make up 1.2 million of the 64million in the UK, even if every single one of those 1.2 million was eligible to vote (some aren't due to nationality status and/or age) then there's still millions more votes required to add up to the figure that Labour had this general election.

 

Also you really shouldn't speak about things you have no idea about. Here in the UK people aren't voting for the leaders, they are voting for parties and it just so happens that Corbyn is a leader of one of those parties. Corbyn might go, but his party will continue.

 

im not trolling at all. its funny u are talking about monkeys. when u pakistanis are inbreeding champions of the world. My point about Pak having double the population of england n australia is to do with their commercial rights they have much more of a larger market and can get larger tv deals. Pakistan is a country where cricket is the undisputed number one sport surely pcb should be able to capitalise on it. Its not ICCs job to give countries hand outs.

 

Yes and most Corbyn supporters are either students socialists n large swathes of the black pakistani n bangladeshi communities. They all want big welfare system so they can carry on doing fraud n getting the big family tax credits n working tax credits.

 

The election was based on much as policies as personalities. A lot of people voted labour because of corbyn himself n the radical left wing agenda he put forward

 

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

 

 

[Khota]

6 hours ago, Shaz1 said:

If its Indian money than it should not need to demand for it. Its clear what evers happening is happening because the one who runs cricket feels that money should be spread out fairly.

 

If you wanna call other boards greedy than your board should not demand for more. Because thats the very definition of greedy. If you don't know what that means than Google it.

If it was not Indian money why are they giving India more. Clearly they would have divided it by numbers of members. Think you Stephen Hawkings with a heart full of hate for India why are they giving India more? India wants a more equitable distribution. Where is the distribution model. Why should the professional beggars like Pakistan get anything? Freaking beggars.

[Khota]

22 minutes ago, Shaz1 said:

In reality this money belongs to ICC because every board is branched off ICC. They are the main organization running cricket, irrelevent of whose bring in more money. Your board is simply greedy for demanding more money. Lets face it Indian cricket would be nothing without international cricket. I can gurentee you Cricket would be nothing in India if it left ICC. So stop begging and start playing. No issue laylo tissue.

 

 

Look at the irony. You are begging us to play with you. Trust me when India gets it Sheet together we will not support ODI and only support one T20 cup. Will stop bidding on TV broasdcasts and then see how you even get 130 million free dollars. Beggars.

[Khota]

22 minutes ago, Shaz1 said:

Lol With the latest news by the BCCI there should be no need to have any series with you guys. I believe we Pakistani's will also take your stance since its dumb asking a nation to play us that involves politics over cricket. I mean your men are not the only ones dying on the boarder. Yet when it comes to discussing cricket with you it is only about there lives that matter. I applaud the Pakistani approach because its thinking of cricket besides politics. But there comes a time when you just need to let go of it all. We got seven other cricket teams to play. So I am sure we will find someone.

 

On the other hand you can continue watching a war on the field besides a cricket match. And make sure to buy an extra pair of TV when you lose next time.

Please take a stance and dont play with India. I wil start respecting you then. Stop this non sense of telling us what to mix and what not to, You did boycott the Moscow Olympics. So get off your high horse. We can also play with other nations and have good time.

 

As far as win is concerned we can beat you anytime. This win does not mean you can beat us all the time. You are no body.

[Khota]

25 minutes ago, Finer said:

BCCI had the opportunity to show that, yet BCCI came to ICC like wagging tails. That happened right in front of the world. Apparently, BCCI deemed 405 million too much to pass for their daily life maintenance. Talk is easy.

BCCI has internal issues right now. Once they get their house in order world order will be restored.

[Khota]

21 minutes ago, Finer said:

 

That is why BCCI is not begging ICC to schedule their match with Pakistan in advance in every stage of every ICC so they don't have to claim bigger pie while deny half portion of pie to Pakistan which is rightly belong to Pakistan since it is Pakistan-India that doesn't sell. 

BCCI doesnt. It is ICC as that is the game they can sell out. I rather not have Pakistan in the same pool. I rather not play you cheats for next 50 years. For our cricket to grow stronger we should have no contact with you. 

[mishra]

2 minutes ago, Khota said:

BCCI has internal issues right now. Once they get their house in order world order will be restored.

That bit is 100% I agree. BCCI has not agreed to play test series against Pakistan till 2023. Looking at schedule, I will say BCCI is hoping things will be back to normal by 2021

[Khota]

34 minutes ago, Shaz1 said:

Take a stance? What stance? Our government said it was ok to play you. Cause we don't mix politics with cricket. It is you who should take a stance to never play us even in ICC events.

 

We have a better head to head record to you. We did not just win once. Not having cricket actually benefits us since we can keep this record intact. So thank you India

Can you answer one question. Why did you not play Moscow olympics? 

Why did your team not shake Dalai Lama's hand in Dharamsala?

 

Quit pontificating us about mixing sports and politics. You do it more. Hypocrites.

[Khota]

38 minutes ago, mishra said:

That bit is 100% I agree. BCCI has not agreed to play test series against Pakistan till 2023. Looking at schedule, I will say BCCI is hoping things will be back to normal by 2021

COA should get out.

[Khota]

1 minute ago, Shaz1 said:

I see so you need to deflate this topic from cricket to make your point.  I have no reason to answer something that is clearly off topic. What does the Olympics have to do with cricket? Cricket is not even a Olympic sport.

 

Anywho since you got nothing to defend your point of view relating to cricket. It seems this debate is officially over. GG

 

#TVScreensMatter

I see you just realised that your country is hypocrite. You use politics sports mixture when convenient. When you get called out you complain. Please answer that question. I can extend the deadline. You have tilll tomorrow.

[Khota]

21 minutes ago, Shaz1 said:

Your arguement is flawed because its going off topic to make this claim. My arguement was on cricket. Not on some Olmpics game. Right now you guys are more worried about the border than actual cricket. That is a fact. 

Like I said you have till tomorrow.

[Khota]

4 minutes ago, Shaz1 said:

Till what? Till you admit you lost the arguement and resorted to non cricketing debate? I will wait for that. Looking forward to it.

I will give you an F tomorrow.

[Vilander]

17 hours ago, Finer said:

BCCI gets lot more from ICC. So far, it is 405 million dollars US whereas the rest of cricket boards are getting below 200 million dollars US.

 

One match of Pakistan-India alone in ICC, which is purposely put by BCCI with ICC in every group stages of ICC tournament, to make up for the entire revenue which goes majority of share to BCCI, and PCB the none. Greedy knows no bound i am afraid.

80% of ICc revenue is form India, so India should get 1.6 bil and Pak 10 mill actually. We will get there in time dont worry. 

[Khota]

22 minutes ago, Shaz1 said:

F for Fabulious.

 

Thank you 

 

I will give you T for Trying.