Jump to content

Nehru's refusal of Kennedy's offer of nuclear detonation kept India out of the NSG


gattaca

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, gattaca said:

Congress was busy scamming country , people and resources. We had no vision during any congress rule. India couldn’t even develop until Narasimha rao when he opened the market. He was disrespected his body wasn’t even allowed inside congress bhavan and was kept on roads of Delhi. The guy who gave jobs to many Indians in next generations. The opening of economy was key in India’s revival of economic story. Nehru was a socialist and had no vision except sleeping with Mountbatten’s wife and other woman. He never wanted to be non aligned and gifting china Aksai chin, abandoning Indian fighter jet project(we were collaborating with Egypt this was built by Germans), UNSC seat and not taking up US offer on nuclear weapons. He and his progeny stuck with socialism while Indians didn’t even had food to eat only PV narasimha changed it. Congress doesn’t have guts to even respect him because he challenged sonia Gandhi for CWC presidency. There is a time when you play politics and when you done congress doesn’t know when to stop example Bjp could have stayed quiet when khalistanis did the rally that portrayed indira gandhi’s death but they didn’t they understand she was indian prime minister and deserves respect.

In retrospect Nehru policies were not the best and I agree. Rao and MMS were both excellent for growth. I think Modi has also done a very good job.

But the effort to marginalize Gandhi and Nehru is in full swing and that does not help the nation. 

On October first I got a dozen of anti Gandhi videos from my friends. No coincidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Khota said:

In retrospect Nehru policies were not the best and I agree. Rao and MMS were both excellent for growth. I think Modi has also done a very good job.

But the effort to marginalize Gandhi and Nehru is in full swing and that does not help the nation. 

On October first I got a dozen of anti Gandhi videos from my friends. No coincidence.

 

Has it ever occured to you, that it is EXTREMELY UNNATURAL for a so-called freedom fighter to be very popular with the media & institutions of the country they are fighting to get freedom from ? George Washington, Thomas jefferson etc were treated as 'luccha lafangaa' by the Brit Media for the next 100 years. So is the case with Simon Bolivar and Spain, Louis Real & France, etc. But Gandhi & Nehru  are very popular WITH the Brits - both from THEIR era and now- while India accomplished jack **** under Nehru and Gandhi managed to sideline the most popular INC leader with his autocratic tendencies. 

So as far as i am concerned, they SHOULD be marginalised. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Muloghonto said:

 

Has it ever occured to you, that it is EXTREMELY UNNATURAL for a so-called freedom fighter to be very popular with the media & institutions of the country they are fighting to get freedom from ? George Washington, Thomas jefferson etc were treated as 'luccha lafangaa' by the Brit Media for the next 100 years. So is the case with Simon Bolivar and Spain, Louis Real & France, etc. But Gandhi & Nehru  are very popular WITH the Brits - both from THEIR era and now- while India accomplished jack **** under Nehru and Gandhi managed to sideline the most popular INC leader with his autocratic tendencies. 

So as far as i am concerned, they SHOULD be marginalised. 

 

That is your opinion and I disagree.

 

Gandhi sacrificed a lot for the country and so did Nehru. The greatest leader of last century was Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi and you can do your best and it will never be savarkar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Khota said:

That is your opinion and I disagree.

 

Gandhi sacrificed a lot for the country and so did Nehru. The greatest leader of last century was Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi and you can do your best and it will never be savarkar.

 

MK Gandhi allowed multiple genocides to happen in India and justified them. How can he be a leader let alone the best leader? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Khota said:

That is your opinion and I disagree.

 

Gandhi sacrificed a lot for the country and so did Nehru. The greatest leader of last century was Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi and you can do your best and it will never be savarkar.

 

They sacrificed for their advancement. The greatest leader of last century is the guy who invoked autocratic manmaani to sideline the most popular leader ? That makes sense ? 

You are the one bringing in Savarkar, i have never even mentioned Savarkar. As far as i am concerned, the greatest leader for independence is Bose, who should be the father of the nation. If from post independent era, its Modi. 

Where are you getting savarkar from, from my position ?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

 

They sacrificed for their advancement. The greatest leader of last century is the guy who invoked autocratic manmaani to sideline the most popular leader ? That makes sense ? 

You are the one bringing in Savarkar, i have never even mentioned Savarkar. As far as i am concerned, the greatest leader for independence is Bose, who should be the father of the nation. If from post independent era, its Modi. 

Where are you getting savarkar from, from my position ?

 

Bose I respect because he was not a coward like Savarkar. Bose should be up there but Gandhi should be above all of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, bharathh said:

 

You should read about the Mopala genocide, the Naokhali genocide etc. and what MK had to say about them. Just because you are ignorant doesn't mean they didn't occur.

You should read some more about Indian independence from neutral sources.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Khota said:

Bose I respect because he was not a coward like Savarkar. Bose should be up there but Gandhi should be above all of them.

Gandhi should be below bose since he wasnt even as popular as bose near the end and had to resort to manmani to split the congress to try and oust Bose. The only reason congress didn't split is because Bose resigned under Gandhi's autocratic manmaani. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

Gandhi should be below bose since he wasnt even as popular as bose near the end and had to resort to manmani to split the congress to try and oust Bose. The only reason congress didn't split is because Bose resigned under Gandhi's autocratic manmaani. 

 

Not just Bose. 

 

MK Gandhi also insisted that Pak get all the money during partition, insisted that Nehru become PM although Vallabhai Patel was elected almost unanimously as the leader. Few people have screwed India like MK Gandhi and the adopted Gandhi family.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, bharathh said:

Not just Bose. 

 

MK Gandhi also insisted that Pak get all the money during partition, insisted that Nehru become PM although Vallabhai Patel was elected almost unanimously as the leader. Few people have screwed India like MK Gandhi and the adopted Gandhi family.

All the while, the Brits are going 'wot a great great man, what a noble chaddi-dhari guru of India'. And that is not 'daal me kuch kaala haye' with the brainwashed retards 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Muloghonto said:

All the while, the Brits are going 'wot a great great man, what a noble chaddi-dhari guru of India'. And that is not 'daal me kuch kaala haye' with the brainwashed retards 

 

The brainwashing worked. Look at what he said when asked about Indian history. He wants to quote neutral sources about Indian history :phehe:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bharathh said:

The brainwashing worked. Look at what he said when asked about Indian history. He wants to quote neutral sources about Indian history :phehe:

 

 

Translation : Anglo sources are neutral sources. Just like how a white gora entity like SEC is fine, but its exact analog in India ( SEBI) is not fine. 

mentally enslaved gungadeens. Common amongst the neo-liberal types. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

Translation : Anglo sources are neutral sources. Just like how a white gora entity like SEC is fine, but its exact analog in India ( SEBI) is not fine. 

mentally enslaved gungadeens. Common amongst the neo-liberal types. 

 

History is generally written from the viewpoint of winners and not by neutrals...At the least one should read multiple sources & refute with proof instead of inane arguments 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...