Forever Indian Posted April 7 Share Posted April 7 1 hour ago, Lord said: Why is no one considering Samson for keeping job? In T20s he should be seriously considered. The one thing he has to get right is consistency and also making the most of his chances in International matches. He failed to do both untill last year. Consistency seems defenitely improved now. Lord, sorak and cricketfan28 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tillu Posted April 7 Share Posted April 7 2 hours ago, Lord said: Why is no one considering Samson for keeping job? On current form Sanju is the best of the lot. He even scored a century in South Africa in ODI cricket. Instead of looking at him as a stop gap solution, they should give him continuous chances in 2-3 series. sorak and Lord 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raki05 Posted April 7 Share Posted April 7 Lol at people keeping Pandya as finisher, look at his batting in this ipl or in general last few years, he sucks badly with those 100-110 sr in t20. Ultimate_Game 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultimate_Game Posted April 7 Author Share Posted April 7 5 hours ago, cowboysfan said: jitesh? what has he done? .I would rather pick Pant than Jitesh and I don't think Pant is a good LOI player. Jitesh will never get the headlines as he's not someone who'll score 50s and 100s. But he'll give you those quick 20s and 30s lower down the order which is essential at the death. None of our batsmen currently can do so. Lord 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
putrevus Posted April 7 Share Posted April 7 RCB batting even if it is slow is not losing matches for its batting alone. You need bowlers too. Every batsman will look million times better than they acutually are when facing RCB bowlers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultimate_Game Posted April 7 Author Share Posted April 7 37 minutes ago, putrevus said: RCB batting even if it is slow is not losing matches for its batting alone. You need bowlers too. Every batsman will look million times better than they acutually are when facing RCB bowlers. Yes, they're losing due to their batting. When you're 100/0 and still can't get close to 200, the batting is at fault. Take a look at how SRH/Abhishek and KKR bat, and then watch RCB openers bat. Lack of intent and selfishness is there to see. Blaming bowling when 200 is a par score on a patta is a laughable excuse. Vijy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
putrevus Posted April 8 Share Posted April 8 17 hours ago, Ultimate_Game said: Yes, they're losing due to their batting. When you're 100/0 and still can't get close to 200, the batting is at fault. Take a look at how SRH/Abhishek and KKR bat, and then watch RCB openers bat. Lack of intent and selfishness is there to see. Blaming bowling when 200 is a par score on a patta is a laughable excuse. I don't think so, Bowlers should be able to defend 180 plus . Let Abhisek do more than couple of game before turning him into Bradman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts