Cricketics Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 Zaheer was clearly the player of the day for me. i mean 5 overs 20 runs 2 wkts. that was some fantastic, smart bowling from him. Sehwag played awesome, but Zaheer was the stand out player. game which was overdosed with runs, there was one stand out bowler, and that was ZAHEER and hence i think he should have been the clear Man of the Match for todayz game Link to comment
zubinpepsi Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 i agree.. Zak shud have been given.. dont know which moron selects MOM Link to comment
DomainK Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 Yes, even I agree. ZAK deserved it fully. Link to comment
Kartikey Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 I also agree. Viru was definitely awesome but Zak was amazing again under pressure. Link to comment
Indus_Army Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 Zak would have been my MoM as well. But we must not downplay Viru's crucial contribution. If he had scratched around during the 17 overs before the rain break, we would have probably ended having to defend 160-170 instead of 198. I suspect that swayed the decision in Viru's favour. Link to comment
punjabi_khota Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 Zak would have been my MoM as well. But we must not downplay Viru's crucial contribution. If he had scratched around during the 17 overs before the rain break, we would have probably ended having to defend 160-170 instead of 198. I suspect that swayed the decision in Viru's favour. :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: When was the last time VIRU scratched around ??????:giggle::giggle::giggle: Link to comment
Sachinism Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 Yeh Zak was just amazing today, England did not have an answer to him, top class performance, its a shame bowlers are rarely recognized Link to comment
flamy Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 Zakhareah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment
Donny Posted November 25, 2008 Share Posted November 25, 2008 Means little as it's often just one opinion. Many thought, as did I, that Simon Katich should have been given the award for his unbeaten century in the Test against NZ. Mitch Johnson's 9/69 looks impressive but 5 of them were #8 batsmen or below. Link to comment
Dinx - the Jinx Posted November 25, 2008 Share Posted November 25, 2008 Means little as it's often just one opinion. Many thought, as did I, that Simon Katich should have been given the award for his unbeaten century in the Test against NZ. Mitch Johnson's 9/69 looks impressive but 5 of them were #8 batsmen or below. Who cares what you thnk abt ausie cricket and why wud we care whether it iskatich who gets it or johnson. Totally irrelevant post. Try to post something relevant to the threa. Dont keep singing about aussies. Getting sick Link to comment
Dinx - the Jinx Posted November 25, 2008 Share Posted November 25, 2008 My MOM would also be Zaheer. We could have een in trouble had Zaheer went for runs lie he did in the 2003 WC final. These days he's a better bowler and gets MoM every 4-5 matches he plays Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now