fineleg Posted February 5, 2009 Share Posted February 5, 2009 Is he taking over the BS mantle from Pwnting? http://content-usa.cricinfo.com/ausvnz2008/content/current/story/389282.html Michael Clarke must have a short memory. Four days ago, Australia were beaten by New Zealand in Perth. Then they decided to rest their captain and best batsman Ricky Ponting for the next two matches. Two years ago they also let Ponting sit out of the Chappell-Hadlee Series and were beaten 3-0. And yet in the lead-up to Friday's second ODI in Melbourne, Clarke, the stand-in captain, said it was "unthinkable" that Australia would lose the series. Perhaps nobody has told him that in the five years the competition has been going, New Zealand have a 6-5 winning record despite being the permanent underdogs. "New Zealand is a very good one-day team but I'm very confident in the Australian team at the moment," Clarke said ahead of Friday's second ODI in Melbourne. "We've got plenty of talent, plenty of potential, plenty of youth, plenty of excitement and if we play our best cricket we can beat the Kiwis. Right now for me certainly it is unthinkable [to lose]." Perhaps that's because in his seven matches in charge of Australia at ODI and Twenty20 level, Clarke has never led a losing team. Friday will be his toughest challenge, when he is given the reins of a side extremely light on experience. Besides Ponting, Australia are also without Shaun Marsh, who has a hamstring problem, on top of their long-term injury concerns. Callum Ferguson is likely to make his ODI debut, Adam Voges could come in for his second match and Clarke will need contributions from both men as Australia aim to retain the trophy they regained in 2007-08. The New Zealand captain Daniel Vettori said his squad was already visualising what Clarke felt was inconceivable. "Our team's got to imagine that," Vettori said. "We've got to think about winning this series. We're 1-0 up and if we can grab these next two games then we win it. The Chappell-Hadlee is very important to us, and very important to the people back home. It's one of the series that they seem to be most up for, and that's probably because we've played relatively well in it over the last few years." There is no doubt that New Zealand lift when the trophy is up for grabs. Part of the reason is that Australia, who have triumphed in all 11 non Chappell-Hadlee ODIs the teams have played since the trophy was struck, effectively treat it as a second-string event. In 2006-07, Ponting and the vice-captain Adam Gilchrist were rested, while the previous year Glenn McGrath was given a break. Vettori would not be drawn on whether it was disrespectful for Australia to leave Ponting out but he said it would be difficult for Australia to adjust to not having him around the group. "You always come back to what he brings to the table with performance and his record speaks for itself," Vettori said. "Any time you take that out it's always hard to adjust to. But from what I've seen of Michael Clarke he's a pretty good leader and a respected guy." New Zealand are likely to take the same XI in to the MCG match following their Perth success, which was overshadowed by the controversy surrounding Brad Haddin's involvement in the dismissal of Neil Broom. For Clarke, the challenge is to ensure his men are focused on improving, especially with the bat, and leave the off-field argy-bargy behind them. "We have been a little bit disappointing of late and we've got some work to do to get back to where we want to be and it starts tomorrow," Clarke said. "We had a really good chat yesterday. All the players had a really good opportunity to get whatever was on their chest off their chest, if anything." Link to comment
flamy Posted February 5, 2009 Share Posted February 5, 2009 Is he taking over the BS mantle from Pwnting? He has to. It's a job req. Link to comment
Sachinism Posted February 5, 2009 Share Posted February 5, 2009 I pray they get their asses whooped Link to comment
EnterTheVoid Posted February 5, 2009 Share Posted February 5, 2009 Of course it's unthinkable You think the reaction to losing to N.Z. will go down well? Link to comment
fineleg Posted February 5, 2009 Author Share Posted February 5, 2009 ^ what do u mean its unthinkable sree? They just lost to NZ the odi, and lost two years ago as well! Link to comment
EnterTheVoid Posted February 5, 2009 Share Posted February 5, 2009 ^^ Public perception is a different ball game altogether Public wants wins -> no wins makes public angry; thats all that matters Link to comment
Chandan Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 And yet in the lead-up to Friday's second ODI in Melbourne, Clarke, the stand-in captain, said it was "unthinkable" that Australia would lose the series. Perhaps nobody has told him that in the five years the competition has been going, New Zealand have a 6-5 winning record despite being the permanent underdogs. They haven't lost the series yet, but lost the second match straight in the series to give kiwis a lead of 2-0. Well done Clarke!!:winky: Link to comment
EnterTheVoid Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 Listen to the interviews http://www.abc.net.au/grandstand/cricket/ Link to comment
f.b.m Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 Its a nice sign in the career to do the unthinkable so early in his captaincy career. Link to comment
EnterTheVoid Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 check out some of the reports from the sydney morning herald gloves are off Link to comment
Guest dada_rocks Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 Has Shane Bond been not banned Aussies team wud have lost miserably... I hate ICl/IPL saga for just oen player that is Shanbe Bond.. That guy is a gem of a cricketer to be not playing mainstream cricket Link to comment
Lord Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 Has Shane Bond been not banned Aussies team wud have lost miserably... I hate ICl/IPL saga for just oen player that is Shanbe Bond.. That guy is a gem of a cricketer to be not playing mainstream cricket agree but hes got himself to blame.he effectively chose money over country. Link to comment
Sachinism Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 Has Shane Bond been not banned Aussies team wud have lost miserably... I hate ICl/IPL saga for just oen player that is Shanbe Bond.. That guy is a gem of a cricketer to be not playing mainstream cricket If not for the ICL saga, Pakistan would have had some decent players Link to comment
EnterTheVoid Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 ^^ who would be fighting each other in the dressing room Link to comment
DomainK Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 It is untinkable for him because he is incapable of thinking straight. A mind too occupied with BS is left with little room for thinking. Link to comment
satishg Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 It is untinkable for him because he is incapable of thinking straight. A mind too occupied with BS is left with little room for thinking. :hysterical::hysterical: good one :cantstop: Link to comment
CSK Fan Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 agree but hes got himself to blame.he effectively chose money over country. No he didnt. New Zealand gave him the go ahead first. Then bowing to BCCI they banned him. Unlike Yosuf, Bond stuck to his guns and didnt do a U-turn even though it was his board's fault. Link to comment
flamy Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 Its a nice sign in the career to do the unthinkable so early in his captaincy career. :haha::haha: Link to comment
Lord Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 No he didnt. New Zealand gave him the go ahead first. Then bowing to BCCI they banned him. Unlike Yosuf' date=' Bond stuck to his guns and didnt do a U-turn even though it was his board's fault.[/quote'] but it was a bad option anyway n too much risk to take.everyone knows about BCCI's clout,nobody's gonna refuse them.and he would have earnt a lot more in IPL anyway Link to comment
Guest dada_rocks Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 but it was a bad option anyway n too much risk to take.everyone knows about BCCI's clout' date='nobody's gonna refuse them.and he would have earnt a lot more in IPL anyway[/quote'] He can;t be faulted for BCCI's clout he is answerable to his own board and his own board gave him go ahead and he joined ICL.. Obviously he is man of hsi words so unlike Yousuf didn't do this back and forth nautanki.. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now