vadodaravictor Posted February 13, 2009 Posted February 13, 2009 amits needs a bail out....pass his $700000 stimulus bill :protest::protest::protest::protest::protest:
amits Posted February 13, 2009 Author Posted February 13, 2009 i want the $700000 back. the only way i should have lost them was if aus won the series, but that didnt happen & i want the $700000 back :protest::protest::protest:
Shane Posted February 13, 2009 Posted February 13, 2009 Ban amits !!!! :protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest::protest:
Holysmoke Posted February 13, 2009 Posted February 13, 2009 i want the $700000 back. the only way i should have lost them was if aus won the series, but that didnt happen & i want the $700000 back :protest::protest::protest: No, the only way you would have won the bet was if NZ won the series. NZ didnt win the series. so you dont win any moneys. Remember, you bet for NZ to win, not for Aus to lose. The bet said "Series winner"... not "who will not lose the series" NZ wasnt the series winner. Bichara:giggle:
Dravid Posted February 13, 2009 Posted February 13, 2009 motu, point is aus is not the series winner either :D i say its jilka's fault for not having series tie as an option.. ban pj :protest: :D
Mr. Wicket Posted February 13, 2009 Posted February 13, 2009 motu' date=' point is aus is not the series winner either :D[/quote'] That means nobody wins. Except the bookies. :D
Sachinism Posted February 13, 2009 Posted February 13, 2009 motu, point is aus is not the series winner either :D i say its jilka's fault for not having series tie as an option.. ban pj :protest: :D bookies didn't offer no odds, so i couldn't offer you guys the odds
Holysmoke Posted February 13, 2009 Posted February 13, 2009 motu, point is aus is not the series winner either :D Halkat, that doesnt matter to you. You bet on NZ, NZ didnt win. What happ to AUS is none of your concern. You bet on NZ to win, didnt happen. You lose.
TaNk Posted February 13, 2009 Posted February 13, 2009 I just had 100k from Big Blue and i bet 60k on aussi .. better give our money back :((
Mr. Wicket Posted February 13, 2009 Posted February 13, 2009 motu, point is aus is not the series winner either :D i say its jilka's fault for not having series tie as an option.. ban pj :protest: :D Oh please. If you wanted a series tie as an option, you should have asked for it. If you couldn't get a series tie as an option, you shouldn't have bet on something else. Seriously, if you're ****ing stupid enough to walk into a betting shop, decide to place a bet on an outcome you think will happen... find it's not available and bet on something else - you deserve to lose your money.
ludhianvi Posted February 13, 2009 Posted February 13, 2009 I think if you dont settle the bets for 7 days after the payout date, then the stakes are returned
Sachinism Posted February 13, 2009 Posted February 13, 2009 I think if you dont settle the bets for 7 days after the payout date' date=' then the stakes are returned[/quote'] EMC has decided not to give refunds :yay:
Mr. Wicket Posted February 13, 2009 Posted February 13, 2009 I believe Sachinism already settled the bets, ludh.
Sachinism Posted February 13, 2009 Posted February 13, 2009 That means nobody wins. Except the bookies. :D :haha: thanks
flamy Posted February 13, 2009 Posted February 13, 2009 what I dont get is how did @|\/|!&$ get the intelligence to use the protest smiley.... :dontknow:
Dravid Posted February 13, 2009 Posted February 13, 2009 Halkat' date=' that doesnt matter to you. You bet on NZ, NZ didnt win. What happ to AUS is none of your concern. You bet on NZ to win, didnt happen. You lose.[/quote'] y not, popat? i believe in fairness :proud: aus got the trophy so they should be the winners... ppl who betted to aus should have won.. and if you look at it as a tie 2-2.. then stakes should be returned for everyone who betted, because there was no option.. Oh please. If you wanted a series tie as an option, you should have asked for it. If you couldn't get a series tie as an option, you shouldn't have bet on something else. Seriously, if you're ****ing stupid enough to walk into a betting shop, decide to place a bet on an outcome you think will happen... find it's not available and bet on something else - you deserve to lose your money. i thought it was gonna be a tie? right.. i betted once nzl went up 2-0 so was basically hoping for nzl series win..anyways relax, i got enuff e-money to piss away :hahaha: btw even if i had asked him to add a tie option, it wasnt gonna happen since there were no odds on it..
Dravid Posted February 13, 2009 Posted February 13, 2009 what I dont get is how did @|/|!&$ get the intelligence to use the protest smiley.... :dontknow: :hysterical::hysterical: sad thing is i agree with him in this thread :((:((
amits Posted February 14, 2009 Author Posted February 14, 2009 give my $700000 back :protest::protest::protest:
Recommended Posts