flamy Posted May 14, 2009 Share Posted May 14, 2009 Is the icon player thingy still on? And even if it is, it is just for the three-year contract right? Things would get very interesting if some icon players shift teams. For one, if Dhoni leaves CSK, I'll be Masakkali PWND. Dada may not last, Dravid and Kumble or the out too. Tendulkar is severely damaging his morale by continuing on, but there is no chance of him relegating the captaincy - he is stuck in it. DC do not have icons and when Gilly leaves - if they make Symonds the captain, then DC bye bye. All this of course allowing the IPL to last for longer than 3 seasons :--D Even Heroes fizzed out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sachinism Posted May 14, 2009 Share Posted May 14, 2009 ^^ quota player Rohit Sharma will be captain with Gilly leaves lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flamy Posted May 14, 2009 Author Share Posted May 14, 2009 ^^ quota player Rohit Sharma will be captain with Gilly leaves lol I have a feeling Bombay will entice him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vvvslaxman Posted May 14, 2009 Share Posted May 14, 2009 I think after next edition it will be gone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jf1gp_1 Posted May 14, 2009 Share Posted May 14, 2009 bump this thread in 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flamy Posted May 14, 2009 Author Share Posted May 14, 2009 I think after next edition it will be gone. You mean the icon players thingy or IPL? :--D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vvvslaxman Posted May 14, 2009 Share Posted May 14, 2009 You mean the icon players thingy or IPL? :--D Well later cannot be ruled out. I won't be feeling bad about it. But it will make our neighbours happy. That is a NO NO. They should continue to be jealous for the rest of their lives :winky: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hiten. Posted May 14, 2009 Share Posted May 14, 2009 Icon player rule will remain, IMO. This is because all the icon players are a BIG HIT in their respective states/cities. Do you think people will follow Mumbai if SRT was playing for Bangalore ?, Kolkata if Ganguly played for Mumbai ? It's a good rule and they have to make sure these Icon's last for at least 2-3 years more so that the public is really into IPL and then they can slowly fade away (of course the oldies) from the IPL and go into their franchise's management. IPL need to get at least 2-3 more teams and ask ICC to give them a window of 2 months every year; allowing all the players from different country to participate without any other commitments. Champions league should not happen because it will overkill the T20 format and people will lost interest in other forms of cricket. IPL has be the nuclei of T20 format providing all the entertainment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vvvslaxman Posted May 14, 2009 Share Posted May 14, 2009 Ganguly is not an iconic player any more . Buchanan is their iconic player. I heard KKR is going to lose Kolkata form their title. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hiten. Posted May 14, 2009 Share Posted May 14, 2009 Oh btw, DC made the smartest move by asking VVS to give up the icon player status allowing them a flexibility when bidding a higher amount. But then again, SRT, Dada, UV couldn't have done that as bidders would have pounced on them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ram Posted May 14, 2009 Share Posted May 14, 2009 Oh btw' date=' DC made the smartest move by asking VVS to give up the icon player status allowing them a flexibility when bidding a higher amount. But then again, SRT, Dada, UV couldn't have done that as bidders would have pounced on them.[/quote'] VVS did it out of his own accord. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts