amits Posted May 22, 2009 Share Posted May 22, 2009 a team which dominates all other teams for over 14 matches, with 3 comfortable points clear of 2nd place team with 2 more wins & qualified for the semis with 4 matches still left in hand plays against a team which qualified with 14 points & only due to some arbitrary mathematical calculations(net run-rate). if it is a 8-team league, the n the top ranked team should never be asked to play aganst a team ranked 4th. at best, a final can be there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zubinpepsi Posted May 22, 2009 Share Posted May 22, 2009 mwaaahahahahaaaaa keep them cumin all dilliwaalla.... im loving thissssssssssssss this is not just the IPL format duffer.. its the same all over.. if u lose in the semifinals u get knocked out.. simple.. :cantstop: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane Posted May 22, 2009 Share Posted May 22, 2009 Would we be having this Thread if Delhi would have been the Team finishing fourth and winning the Finals? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cowboysfan Posted May 22, 2009 Share Posted May 22, 2009 what stupid logic-you need a post season otherwise IPL will be boring.Its the fault of DD for choking 2 years in a row. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sachinism Posted May 22, 2009 Share Posted May 22, 2009 Stop your whining if 4 teams go through, it should always be 1 vs 4 and 2 vs 3 But I do feel sorry for DD, they dominated the whole tournament and got Gillied when it mattered Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cricketics Posted May 22, 2009 Share Posted May 22, 2009 Amits created this thread thinking he would look funny so that people can laugh a bit and he can get attention. AMITS JUST SHUT THE PHACK OFF.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Sharma Posted May 22, 2009 Share Posted May 22, 2009 :aetsch: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Outsider Posted May 22, 2009 Share Posted May 22, 2009 Would we be having this Thread if Delhi would have been the Team finishing fourth and winning the Finals? Yes, I've been saying it since the start of last year's IPL - it is idiotic to play 56 games to eliminate 4 out of 8 teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Warrior Posted May 22, 2009 Share Posted May 22, 2009 hume to apno ne loota, gairo me kaha dum tha... mere kashti thi doobi waha, jahan paani kam tha... :giggle: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane Posted May 22, 2009 Share Posted May 22, 2009 Yes' date=' I've been saying it since the start of last year's IPL - it is idiotic to play 56 games to eliminate 4 out of 8 teams.[/quote'] Are you hinting towards, only having a League to find the Champion and eliminate the K/O part of the competition? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amits Posted May 22, 2009 Author Share Posted May 22, 2009 before anyone makes fun of me without any reason, last year i had no problems with delhi losing in the semi-final. i myself wanted rajasthan to win last year in the semi-final as delhi was the 4th placed team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Outsider Posted May 22, 2009 Share Posted May 22, 2009 Are you hinting towards' date=' only having a League to find the Champion and eliminate the K/O part of the competition?[/quote'] Either that or at most have a final. If there were 15-20 teams a semi final would make sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cowboysfan Posted May 22, 2009 Share Posted May 22, 2009 Yes' date=' I've been saying it since the start of last year's IPL - it is idiotic to play 56 games to eliminate 4 out of 8 teams.[/quote'] i wouldnt watch a tournament which doesnt have a post -season,that will plain suck.we have a similar system in the NFL and nobody is complaining about it.a 9-7 team played in the superbowl too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Sharma Posted May 22, 2009 Share Posted May 22, 2009 I have been saying best of three is the ideal way of deciding the champs. If they can squeeze in 56 games in 6 weeks then they can find time for 6 more surely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fineleg Posted May 22, 2009 Share Posted May 22, 2009 @m!7$ :dc: kicked the butt of DillyDobbliesDevils Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Warrior Posted May 22, 2009 Share Posted May 22, 2009 :adore: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freedom Posted May 22, 2009 Share Posted May 22, 2009 It should always be best of three in semis and finals. That would be appropriate. BTW its always nice to see delhi loose. They are paying the price for not picking Mcgrath, Good job Nannes :--) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holysmoke Posted May 22, 2009 Share Posted May 22, 2009 THE biggest CHOKE of them all :hysterical: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freedom Posted May 22, 2009 Share Posted May 22, 2009 @m!7$ :dc: kicked the butt of DillyDobbliesDevils gilly you legend :adore: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Outsider Posted May 22, 2009 Share Posted May 22, 2009 i wouldnt watch a tournament which doesnt have a post -season' date='that will plain suck.we have a similar system in the NFL and nobody is complaining about it.a 9-7 team played in the superbowl too.[/quote'] :laugh: How many teams does NFL have? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts