pan_walla Posted June 9, 2009 Posted June 9, 2009 Geoffrey Boycott was also born in india.And he thinks that English team is roooobish. I want Boycott to call India "Brown Horses" of the tournament or I will class him as racist as well :giggle:
The Outsider Posted June 9, 2009 Posted June 9, 2009 Which category would constant rape/molestation attempts on white foreign tourists in India fall under?
nikred Posted June 9, 2009 Posted June 9, 2009 Which category would constant rape/molestation attempts on white foreign tourists in India fall under? rape/ sexual assault. :hatsoff:
The Outsider Posted June 9, 2009 Posted June 9, 2009 rape/ sexual assault. :hatsoff: Why are white foreigners the wine of choice?
zubinpepsi Posted June 9, 2009 Posted June 9, 2009 Why are white foreigners the wine of choice? cuz pink poons r most wanted in our society..
zubinpepsi Posted June 9, 2009 Posted June 9, 2009 Thank you! Indians fawning over fair skinned ladies betrays many things, including a shallow mentality, but certainly NOT racism. All the examples you have listed allege that we are casteist, not racists. Don't get me wrong but you are very easily generalising all of India but probably won't do the same for OZ on the basis of these incidents. Why is that? As I said before, Indians don't act on their alleged 'racism' by going around beating up foreign students. Tell me this. If Mr.X gets jailed for 3 months for assault and battery and 15 years down the line, his kid gets murdered, will he lose the right to ensure that his son's killers are brought to justice? for the noobs: Legal The UN does not define "racism", however it does define "racial discrimination": according to the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, the term "racial discrimination" shall mean any distinction, exclusion, restriction or preference based on race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin which has the purpose or effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal footing, of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural or any other field of public life. '[3] This definition does not make any difference between prosecutions based on ethnicity and race, in part because the distinction between the two remains debatable among anthropologists.[4] According to British law, racial group means "any group of people who are defined by reference to their race, colour, nationality (including citizenship) or ethnic or national origin".[5]
flamy Posted June 9, 2009 Posted June 9, 2009 Since, when do my sexual preferences have to be politically correct?
zubinpepsi Posted June 9, 2009 Posted June 9, 2009 Would that definition you've pulled out and quoted with glee hold me GUILTY if I ask my parents ONLY to choose a very gori bride for me? look its personal taste.. but that has blossomed from the mindset we have developed over the years..tht whitee/fair are superior and blacks r inferior n not wanted int he society.. the 1st question everybody says abt a new born baby is oww the baby is very fair n white.. u can see how they r disappointed if its a dark baby...wtf? but bottom line is thts racial discrimination and thts wat the legal definition says..
The Outsider Posted June 9, 2009 Posted June 9, 2009 Since' date=' when do my sexual preferences have to be politically correct?[/quote'] I don't think caucasian women being the preferred target of rape and molestation is a case of "sexual preferences".
The Outsider Posted June 9, 2009 Posted June 9, 2009 Pink poons are wanted AND present themselves as soft targets - just like those hapless Indian students in Australia. Sorry' date=' this is no racism.[/quote'] Spoken like the Aussie mullah talking about cat and uncovered meat.
zubinpepsi Posted June 9, 2009 Posted June 9, 2009 Since' date=' when do my sexual preferences have to be politically correct?[/quote'] well see everyone has their own taste.. nothing wrong with tht.. but yes it has to be politically correct to the outsiders..but trust me, if u gonna say tht u dont prefer black poons jus cuz they r black, u gonna be labelled as a racist... outsiders i dont mean ur friends..u can talk sh!t with them anyways.. doest matter..
Gambit Posted June 9, 2009 Posted June 9, 2009 Which category would constant rape/molestation attempts on white foreign tourists in India fall under? Despos are equal opportunity attackers in India.
zubinpepsi Posted June 9, 2009 Posted June 9, 2009 When you're in the midst of a bunch of self-loathing Indians. its not about self-loathign me lord.. its about getting off the high horse n acccept wat we are ...
The Outsider Posted June 9, 2009 Posted June 9, 2009 Despos are equal opportunity attackers in India. No they're not - it's pretty obvious that a white foreigner is more at risk for a sexual crime than a Chinese or Black.
flamy Posted June 9, 2009 Posted June 9, 2009 I don't think caucasian women being the preferred target of rape and molestation is a case of "sexual preferences". I was talking about arranged marriages. And I'm not a rapist, just rough :|
zubinpepsi Posted June 9, 2009 Posted June 9, 2009 Hah, you just pulled out some monstrously worded definition to charge us n00bs as guilty and now call it a matter of personal taste? You SHOULD call me a racist for demanding only a gori bride. The truth is you misread that definition. The operative word there is "discrimination" and it's effect which is described as "effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal footing, of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural or any other field of public life." It is self-explanatory if you note the word I've highlighted for you. Public life. Preference for gori bride or gore bachhe != public life. Now if you cannot tell us an example where a dark complexioned dude got scammed in school/college/work etc etc solely due his colour and nothing else - please end your senile ramblings. Thanks. duh.. i have also said the same thing in the other post.. yes i know its a personal taste .. i agree.. but if u gonna tell this to the outside world.. tht u dont want to get married to a black girl cuz shes black, ur termed as a racist.. like it or not thts how the world sees u.. u can gloat all u want and say how racist u r not.. but in the world outside ur jungle, where people live , its termed as racial discrimination.. as far as getting scammed in schools comments, its irrelevant.. cuz there has been enough discrimination against ppl of based on their caste.. thats big enough point to prove tht we r fecking racists...
yoda Posted June 9, 2009 Posted June 9, 2009 duh.. i have also said the same thing in the other post.. yes i know its a personal taste .. i agree.. but if u gonna tell this to the outside world.. tht u dont want to get married to a black girl cuz shes black, ur termed as a racist.. like it or not thts how the world sees u.. u can gloat all u want and say how racist u r not.. but in the world outside ur jungle, where people live , its termed as racial discrimination.. as far as getting scammed in schools comments, its irrelevant.. cuz there has been enough discrimination against ppl of based on their caste.. thats big enough point to prove tht we r fecking racists... dude, racism is about race not color.most whites pefer to marry whites, doesn't mean they are all racists. if you like black skin good for you, if you prefer a fairer skin that's fine too. there is a big difference between personal taste and systematic discrimination.
Recommended Posts