Texy Posted September 17, 2009 Posted September 17, 2009 bas bhi karo yaar... you guys going at it like a broken record...
Lord Posted September 17, 2009 Posted September 17, 2009 what does that midget choking represent i can get thet :blink: go thru the thread
Aadhavzone Posted September 17, 2009 Posted September 17, 2009 go thru the thread sorry i lost my patience, just temme the meaning dat!
Lord Posted September 17, 2009 Posted September 17, 2009 sorry i lost my patience' date=' just temme the meaning dat![/quote'] patriot called SRT the midget choker who according to him isnt a big match player.despite SRT averaging 55 in finals
TSAG_RGB Posted September 17, 2009 Posted September 17, 2009 No one has ever performed consistently - never claimed that. Tendulkar till 1998 was reliable in big games. Regarding the sequence of failures. See below: Stats But post 1998 and leading upto the 2008 CB series ( last finals he played before that as you correctly pointed out was in 2004) 14 finals : Avg 25.83. - this is too long a period and too many a game to just rubbish it off as no one succeeds always.. What is the obsession with that particular streak of SRT? That is only streak of 5 innings or more where he averages below 30. Every modern day batsman who has played 25 or more innings in the finals has even worse streaks than that of SRT. Ponting 15 innings @ 26 Jayasuriya 1)10 innings @ 25 2) 8 innings @ 30 3) 7 innings @ 19 Ganguly 12 innings @ 19 Gilchrist 1) 12 innings @ 31 2) 11 innings @ 29 Steve Waugh 22 innings @ 17 Inzamam 1) 10 innings @ 17 2) 9 innings @ 14 Saeed Anwar 12 innings @ 19 Mark Waugh 16 innings @ 24 And from earlier era Dean Jones 12 innings @ 26 Border 12 innings @ 20
Mr. Wicket Posted September 17, 2009 Posted September 17, 2009 may i know about which player' date=' you guyz are fighting looks like long strong debate...[/quote'] How hard is it to read the first page of this topic (heck the first few posts even) and figure it out?
Lord Posted September 17, 2009 Posted September 17, 2009 great post TSAG_RGB.I hope that shuts him up for good
Gambit Posted September 17, 2009 Posted September 17, 2009 What is the obsession with that particular streak of SRT? That is only streak of 5 innings of more where he averages below 30. Every modern day batsman who has played 25 or more innings in the finals has even worse streaks than that of SRT. Terrific stats! Now watch patriot make excuses for all these players who have had a much longer fallow run in finals than SRT. His beloved taklu and juari, both have had very very bad runs in finals but I'm sure he will brush over these pathetic performances by his gods. :cantstop: This would have opened any critic's eyes but given how our in house dhritirashtra works, I'm not going to hold my breath. :winky:
Mr. Wicket Posted September 17, 2009 Posted September 17, 2009 Probably by stirring up another cloud of nonsense and stats to try and digress from his pawnage (and lead to more pawnage).
Malcolm Merlyn Posted September 17, 2009 Posted September 17, 2009 Terrific stats! Now watch patriot make excuses for all these players who have had a much longer fallow run in finals than SRT. His beloved taklu and juari, both have had very very bad runs in finals but I'm sure he will brush over these pathetic performances by his gods. :cantstop: This would have opened any critic's eyes but given how our in house dhritirashtra works, I'm not going to hold my breath. :winky: naah gambo he mite nt matrialise here any more, will stay invisible till the god has a rare failure smwer
The Outsider Posted September 17, 2009 Posted September 17, 2009 Has patriot overtaken fineleg as the most pawned poster on ICF?
Mr. Wicket Posted September 17, 2009 Posted September 17, 2009 fineleg is way behind in the dust right now. fineleg at least had some shame occasionally, and would try and at the very least retract or apologize for certain comments after being completely pawned or temper nonsense with some common sense in other discussions. With patriot the same arguments keep getting trotted out over and over again, and there's about as much common sense here as there is in a Mohammad Asif excuse for his innocence.
patriot Posted September 18, 2009 Author Posted September 18, 2009 What is the obsession with that particular streak of SRT? That is only streak of 5 innings or more where he averages below 30. Every modern day batsman who has played 25 or more innings in the finals has even worse streaks than that of SRT. Nice effort. The first " bura daur" of Jaya that you show is 91-97 - where all bar one year he was batting lower down, in the side as a bowler who could pinch hit - opening the innings only in the mid 90's - Winning player of the 96 World Cup. The way the destructive levels of Gilchrist and Jaya are( and even our own Viru) - you cannot even begin to compare them to a classical orthodox batsman like SRT in terms of match winning innings. If you look at the string of " failures " of these 2 where they have averaged 25 -30odd in finals - the innings where they have scored BIG ( even a 50-60) they have scored it at a ultra destructive strike rate that has set their team up. The 3-4 innings in the 10-12 " failures" have been 50's and 60's scored at strikes rate ranging from 130-180. Match winning in short. SRT in the stat that I posted, plays ultra conservatively concious of final pressure his strike rate only 70 against a career strike rate of 86, an avg of 25 against a career avg of 44. Pontings a bit of a surprise - but he played an innings of a lifetime in the biggest game there can be - WC finals. ANd even inbetween what you show there is a match winning 120+.
patriot Posted September 18, 2009 Author Posted September 18, 2009 fineleg is way behind in the dust right now. fineleg at least had some shame occasionally, and would try and at the very least retract or apologize for certain comments after being completely pawned or temper nonsense with some common sense in other discussions. With patriot the same arguments keep getting trotted out over and over again, and there's about as much common sense here as there is in a Mohammad Asif excuse for his innocence. LOL..here comes the Mr Righteous aka Hitwicket.:winky: What apology and shame are you talking about man ? Apology for having a strong opinion that differs from a majority ? Rather than me having " shame" - you should perhaps be dissapointed to know that you are not even mature enough to understand that different fans have different expectations - some fans are more demanding than others . As a fan,I have every right to like/dislike , rate / not rate a player, express my feelings/frustrations on our players - thats what forums are for, FYI. Even if they are strongly opinionated against your thoughts the last thing you should be doing is attacking me personally on it - like you have very early in this thread along with a dozen others who have only randomly abused. Its my belief/thought that I've never trusted SRT in pressure on big stages - its out of my personal experience of watching cricket for the last 12 years - I am totally entitled to it. I don't have to think what you think . In my interaction (personal) with fans supporting other countries for a long time - any big match - opposition fans hardly feel worried about SRT. The same way that we anticipate danger from a Hayden or a Jayasuriya. It comes with personal experience . Jacques Kallis for example overall as an allrounder has numbers to die for - even in pure batting terms his average is a replica of SRT in both ODIS and Tests - add to that he has nearly 500 international wickets at an avg of 31 . Yet - I hardly fear him as a player when we play Saffies - he'll play those stable knocks at a good frequency but hardly expected to single handedly take apart an opposition in a big match. Ditto SRT - atleast the SRT post 1998. ( barring the odd destructive knock like the 98 against Pak in WC 2003) . ANywayz peace out. Lets cut this here.
Gambit Posted September 18, 2009 Posted September 18, 2009 Snipped predictable excuse making :cantstop: its out of my personal experience of watching cricket for the last 12 years - I am totally entitled to it. I don't have to think what you think Just one question. Did you start watching cricket in 1997?
patriot Posted September 18, 2009 Author Posted September 18, 2009 Yeah in 1997. But someone who for sure started before you and for that matter anyone on this forum - arguably India's greatest ever allround cricketer, someone who has followed his entire career - and is not from the powerful Maharashtra lobby nor a section of former cricketers who don't have the b@lls to say even the slightest uncomplimentary thing about SRT - I am refering to KAPIL DEV ---Here's what he had to say about SRT just about 2 yrs back: http://www.expressindia.com/news/fullstory.php?newsid=89941 "Every time people hope big things from Sachin Tendulkar but often it is only disappointment that we are left with. He is thought to be the backbone of the Indian team but many times he has not stood up to the ocassion," he said. "Sachin has big records to his name but until he wins matches for India in tight conditions, people will raise fingers at him" "Figures say that Sachin has not been able to perform uunder pressure. This will remain a blot in his career," Kapil Dev said. These kind of questions will be raised in case of Sachin as well and it will continue to remain a blot in his career till he wins matches for India under difficult circumstances Surely, my thoughts are now not so seemlngly " outrageous" - our greatest ever cricketer also vents similar frustration.
Gambit Posted September 18, 2009 Posted September 18, 2009 Yeah in 1997. Ok. Please don't think I am being patronising but if you have started watching India/SRT since 1997 and keep wondering what the big deal about him is, then that explains a lot.
patriot Posted September 18, 2009 Author Posted September 18, 2009 Ok. Please don't think I am being patronising but if you have started watching India/SRT since 1997 and keep wondering what the big deal about him is' date=' then that explains a lot.[/quote'] No one is denying his run making prowess, nor the fact that he had been a prodigy. But surely, Kapil Dev knows what he is talking.
The Outsider Posted September 18, 2009 Posted September 18, 2009 No one is denying his run making prowess' date=' nor the fact that he had been a prodigy. But surely, Kapil Dev knows what he is talking.[/quote'] Kapil has also said he is second only to Bradman. BTW, I am still waiting for your definition of "hardly any"?
Zap_Brannigan Posted September 18, 2009 Posted September 18, 2009 So Kapil dev is ignorant. So fking what? What is a pressure match ? Sachin averages over 50 in finals. What else is a pressure situation? How about matches in which we are almost kicked out of the trny unless we reached the target in reduced overs? Sachin has done that many times. How about WC? Is that pressure situation ? Top scored in 96 and 03 WC including the SF. Did well in 99 WC. Our idiotic team lost against Zim when he wasn't there. He flunked in 07 in the only game that mattered. So he probably has one of the best records in the WC. Just because the others couldn't pull the weight when he failed, doesnt mean Sachin is crap.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now