coffee_rules Posted October 28, 2009 Posted October 28, 2009 win 5-2. Even with a 4-3 series, Aus edges past India. http://icc-cricket.yahoo.net/match_zone/odi_predictor.php
rahul005 Posted October 28, 2009 Posted October 28, 2009 It's going to be a tough series and to win 5-2 would be a great achievement. I don't know if we are capable of it as yet but I'm sure the win in the second ODI has lifted our confidence.
Cricketics Posted October 28, 2009 Posted October 28, 2009 If we need to win 5-2, we need to our bowlers to perform pretty well. Batsmans we have plenty. Tendulkar can score 5 tons in 5 remaining games, so can Yuvi or Sehwag, but we gotta improve the bowling to give support ot our big batting line up.
Dirty_South Posted October 28, 2009 Posted October 28, 2009 Sachin will be back with a bang..watch out folks...
The Outsider Posted October 28, 2009 Posted October 28, 2009 win 5-2. Even with a 4-3 series, Aus edges past India. http://icc-cricket.yahoo.net/match_zone/odi_predictor.php It depends on how the 4-3 is distributed - if Australia wins the earlier matches and India the later ones we will be number 1, but will stay at number 2 if we win the early ones and lose the ones later on.
vvvslaxman Posted October 28, 2009 Posted October 28, 2009 It depends on how the 4-3 is distributed - if Australia wins the earlier matches and India the later ones we will be number 1' date=' but will stay at number 2 if we win the early ones and lose the ones later on.[/quote'] That is a good point. Because higher ranked side stands to lose more than lower ranked side.
The Outsider Posted October 28, 2009 Posted October 28, 2009 That is a good point. Because higher ranked side stands to lose more than lower ranked side. Which brings about another amongst a lot of other flaws in the rankings. Dead rubbers are given equal weight as live matches. If India win the series by the 5th game 4-1, rest their main players and lose the last two matches they would be ranked lower than if they are down 1-3 after the 4th match and win the last three matches. Quite funny and stupid at the same time.
Jersey #10 Posted October 29, 2009 Posted October 29, 2009 In short, India has to win the last three games to take over the numero uno spot... Let's do it India :cheer::cheer: Sachin and Yuvi yet to exploit...:yay:
coffee_rules Posted October 29, 2009 Author Posted October 29, 2009 It depends on how the 4-3 is distributed - if Australia wins the earlier matches and India the later ones we will be number 1' date=' but will stay at number 2 if we win the early ones and lose the ones later on.[/quote'] If India wins 4-3 by losing the first two and winning the last 3: 1 Australia 34 4408 130 40 5050 126 -4 2 India 32 3930 123 38 4805 126 +3 So, there is no guarantee, Aus might pip us on decimal points. If India wins 4-3 by winning nest 3 and losing last two: 1 Australia 34 4408 130 40 5066 127 -3 2 India 32 3930 123 38 4789 126 +3 If India wins 5-2 in any fashion> 1 Australia 34 4408 130 40 4969 124 -6 2 India 32 3930 123 38 4887 129 +6
Desi Cartman Posted October 29, 2009 Posted October 29, 2009 are there any extra points for winning the series ?
ViruRulez Posted October 29, 2009 Posted October 29, 2009 Abe I read an article somewhere that if we just win this series even 4-3 then we will get the no. 1 ranking BTW ho did Aus get 130 points... they were at 122 before CT start... CT me itne saare points kama liya kya :hmmm:
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now