coffee_rules Posted November 17, 2009 Posted November 17, 2009 Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 4s 6s Ct St Tests 54 97 4 4647 226 49.96 7404 62.76 16 15 537 48 32 0 ODIs 92 82 15 3127 116 46.67 3577 87.41 7 20 290 58 32 0 T20Is 20 20 1 558 79 29.36 380 146.84 0 2 59 14 7 0 Now STFU.
Sooda Posted November 17, 2009 Posted November 17, 2009 Mat Inns NO [U][B]Runs [/B][/U]HS Ave BF SR 100 50 4s 6s Ct St Tests 54 97 [U][B]4 [/B][/U] 4647 226 49.96 7404 62.76 16 15 537 48 32 0 ODIs 92 82 15 3127 116 46.67 3577 87.41 7 20 290 58 32 0 T20Is 20 20 1 558 79 29.36 380 146.84 0 2 59 14 7 0 Now STFU. ^ So he made 4 Happy? FOUR RUNS.
Sooda Posted November 17, 2009 Posted November 17, 2009 4 Is listed under the runs column. Its all moved one column across :giggle:
goose Posted November 17, 2009 Posted November 17, 2009 Have I read that right? The greatest batsman in the world isn't even averaging 50 in test cricket?
Dravid Posted November 18, 2009 Posted November 18, 2009 he will be the leading run scorer in the series!!!
ludhianvi Posted November 18, 2009 Posted November 18, 2009 Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 4s 6s Ct St Tests 54 97 4 4647 226 49.96 7404 62.76 16 15 537 48 32 0 ODIs 92 82 15 3127 116 46.67 3577 87.41 7 20 290 58 32 0 T20Is 20 20 1 558 79 29.36 380 146.84 0 2 59 14 7 0 Now STFU. :hail: :hysterical::hysterical:
Guest Gunner Posted November 18, 2009 Posted November 18, 2009 What? The leading light of England, the knight of the realm averages less than 50? He is a disappointment.
Guest Gunner Posted November 22, 2009 Posted November 22, 2009 AFter scoring all of four runs. :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
Guest Gunner Posted November 27, 2009 Posted November 27, 2009 So Pietersen choked today when chasing a big target right? This is an official choke.
The Outsider Posted November 27, 2009 Posted November 27, 2009 So Pietersen choked today when chasing a big target right? This is an official choke. Definition of choke - your name has to be Sachin Tendulkar. Your post fails the basic criteria.
Celeste Posted November 27, 2009 Posted November 27, 2009 Pieterson is looking rusty after a long break. He will be back to his best in the test series.
Mr. Wicket Posted November 27, 2009 Author Posted November 27, 2009 In Pietersen's case, it was a gutsy and flamboyant innings trying to keep up with an impossible rate and all the more creditable given that he was injured not that long ago. In Sachin's case, he just isn't a born winner and couldn't take us over the line. Choked when victory was in sight. Loser. Typical.
Guest Gunner Posted November 27, 2009 Posted November 27, 2009 In Pietersen's case' date=' it was a gutsy and flamboyant innings trying to keep up with an impossible rate and all the more creditable given that he was injured not that long ago.[/quote'] In other words [English hat on] Kevin Pietersen's innings was a back to the wall, trench warfare style exhibhition of guts and courage in the face of the inevitable. A honourable defeat indeed. [/off]
Guest Gunner Posted November 27, 2009 Posted November 27, 2009 Definition of choke - your name has to be Sachin Tendulkar. Your post fails the basic criteria. But of course, how could I forget. Pwnting, KP etc are incapable of choking.
Guest Hiten. Posted November 27, 2009 Posted November 27, 2009 Definition of choke - your name has to be Sachin Tendulkar. Your post fails the basic criteria. As "someone" would put it. I rather have him out for a duck (when chasing 350) than scoring 175 in losing cause :giggle:
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now