DomainK Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
Guest Gunner Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
gaurav92 Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
ViruRulez Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 Awesome :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
DomainK Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 3/4 more centuries in this series will be cool.
Sachinism Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 3/4 more centuries in this series will be cool. I would have been happy with 1 more. 3/4 would be :joyman:
Bumblebee Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 Awsome!!:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
The_beast Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 compare the average and then cry. centuries can be dumb and stupid like they wer today but averages are reliable. Ponting is the better batsmen
coffee_rules Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 Thank you Sangakarra for waiting till Sachin completed 100 before giving up (six overs before close). He could have decided to give up 10 over before and be a spoil sport. Looks like even he wants Sachin to be ahead of Ponting.
Lord Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 Thank you Sangakarra for waiting till Sachin completed 100 before giving up (six overs before close). He could have decided to give up 10 over before and be a spoil sport. Looks like even he wants Sachin to be ahead of Ponting. no he couldnt.it has to mutual agreement to call off the game.infact Sanga was quite pissed wen Sachin decided to carry on after 15 overs were remaining
Sachinism Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 Thank you Sangakarra for waiting till Sachin completed 100 before giving up (six overs before close). He could have decided to give up 10 over before and be a spoil sport. Looks like even he wants Sachin to be ahead of Ponting. Thank him for what? He got his bowlers to bowl well wide of the off stump
The_beast Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 no he couldnt.it has to mutual agreement to call off the game.infact Sanga was quite pissed wen Sachin decided to carry on after 15 overs were remaining and rightly so. it has lowered my opinion of sachin. having to score a hundred on the flatest of all wickets, bhaji could have scored a hundred on this pitch. even saeed ajmal could have!!!!
Sooda Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 ^He save the test for India, thats what se set out to do. Itll probably rank 42nd of his 43 centuries give or tack some hes scored agst Bang/Zimbos AWESOME picy though Tgidi, youre pretty good at this :hatsoff:
Guest Gunner Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 and rightly so. it has lowered my opinion of sachin. having to score a hundred on the flatest of all wickets' date=' [b']bhaji could have scored a hundred on this pitch. even saeed ajmal could have!!!! But they didn't and SRT did, so STFU. Don't come up with could have, would have etc These are irrelevant, inherently useless and idiotic posts which rile me up a lot.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now