The Outsider Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 so i guess the word you have been frequently using for years has no definition in your dictionary. You can define a word in simple words then stop using it over and over again... www.dictionary.com might help.
Jersey #10 Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 call me paki or bangladesi or even chinese...that won't stop me from getting a point across
vvvslaxman Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 draws don't mean India did good...they still dominated... Atleast our team didn't lose 9 tests in a row to Australia like your team :hysterical:
Jersey #10 Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 www.dictionary.com might help. lame.. so you can't define what you mean by quality cricket?
vvvslaxman Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 draws don't mean India did good...they still dominated... But but.. but that is not your favorite format. India pwns Pakistan in the POPULAR FORMAT FOLLOWED BY CRAZY FANS" format T20. :hysterical:
Celeste Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 transparent...you is legend... Since last night you are trying to make a point clear to some noobs ....this morning you are still going on .....
Andy Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 But but.. but that is not your favorite format. India pwns Pakistan in the POPULAR FORMAT FOLLOWED BY CRAZY FANS" format T20. :hysterical: :two_thumbs_up:
f.b.m Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 Congratulations to everyone who posted in this thread. You have successfully wasted about 24 hours of your collective lives.
Lord Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 India has to take one stance.if they dont wanna take it seriosly,they should say it before hand n rest playerslike UV,MSD,Sehwag n play rookies like Pandey,Uthappa n Kohli.if they wanna take it seriously then play full strength team. if after losing,Dhoni says that they treated it as a warm up,then itll come out as lame excuse only.
Andy Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 transparent...you is legend... Since last night you are trying to make a point clear to some noobs ....this morning you are still going on ..... No he iz paki!! :D
Karan114 Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 No he iz paki!! :D Well who knows about annoying Paki trolls better than Celeste?
vvvslaxman Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 Congratulations to everyone who posted in this thread. You have successfully wasted about 24 hours of your collective lives. you are one of us :--D
The Outsider Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 lame.. so you can't define what you mean by quality cricket? www.dictionary.com has the definitions of both "quality" and "cricket" - I am sure. I don't see the need of wasting my time with some idiot who does not even know the definition of quality.
Jersey #10 Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 Atleast our team didn't lose 9 tests in a row to Australia like your team :hysterical: India 307 71.4x8 3.22 -28 2 lost v Australia Adelaide 23 Dec 1967 investigate this query India 251 60.2x8 3.12 -146 4 lost v Australia Adelaide 23 Dec 1967 investigate this query India 173 57.4x8 2.25 173 1 lost v Australia Melbourne 30 Dec 1967 investigate this query India 352 84.7x8 3.11 -4 3 lost v Australia Melbourne 30 Dec 1967 investigate this query India 279 100.0x8 2.09 -100 2 lost v Australia Brisbane 19 Jan 1968 investigate this query India 355 109.6x8 2.42 -39 4 lost v Australia Brisbane 19 Jan 1968 investigate this query India 268 85.1x8 2.36 -49 2 lost v Australia Sydney 26 Jan 1968 investigate this query India 197 73.6x8 2.00 -144 4 lost v Australia Sydney 26 Jan 1968 investigate this query India 271 135.4 1.99 271 1 lost v Australia Mumbai (BS) 4 Nov 1969 investigate this query India 137 90.2 1.51 63 3 lost v Australia Mumbai (BS) 4 Nov 1969 investigate this query 10 matches in a row..
Jersey #10 Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 www.dictionary.com has the definitions of both "quality" and "cricket" - I am sure. I don't see the need of wasting my time with some idiot who does not even know the definition of quality. so you can't define it in your own words? you are joke :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
Fontaine Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 thanks for calling me stupid.i have this attitude that "we play to win the game",no matter how tamasha it might seem to some people. I really hate this attitude that you can lose in some format as long as you win in the other,thats just a cop out and is not fair to a lot of people you think are below your respect.they are paying to watch this game and spend 3 hours of their lives hoping their country will win.Its not too much to expect them to try hard to win the game. Really? Play to win huh? So tell me this do you complain and whine just as much when you see players goofing off, having fun and not taking the damn Pro Bowl seriously? What about Cowboys Preseason games? There's a difference between a player/professional working all his life towards a goal and doing his absolute best to compete. VERSUS: A real or pseudo corporate entity like the IPL, BCCI, or even the NFL forcing meaningless extra games upon players. Come back to me when you understand the difference. Until then, yes you are mindless, and I see this what the 2nd/3rd time you've completely ignored how utterly stupid it is to expect bowlers to take this format seriously from my previous comments. But that's pretty much to be expected from a cowpats fans.
Celeste Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 India 307 71.4x8 3.22 -28 2 lost v Australia Adelaide 23 Dec 1967 investigate this query India 251 60.2x8 3.12 -146 4 lost v Australia Adelaide 23 Dec 1967 investigate this query India 173 57.4x8 2.25 173 1 lost v Australia Melbourne 30 Dec 1967 investigate this query India 352 84.7x8 3.11 -4 3 lost v Australia Melbourne 30 Dec 1967 investigate this query India 279 100.0x8 2.09 -100 2 lost v Australia Brisbane 19 Jan 1968 investigate this query India 355 109.6x8 2.42 -39 4 lost v Australia Brisbane 19 Jan 1968 investigate this query India 268 85.1x8 2.36 -49 2 lost v Australia Sydney 26 Jan 1968 investigate this query India 197 73.6x8 2.00 -144 4 lost v Australia Sydney 26 Jan 1968 investigate this query India 271 135.4 1.99 271 1 lost v Australia Mumbai (BS) 4 Nov 1969 investigate this query India 137 90.2 1.51 63 3 lost v Australia Mumbai (BS) 4 Nov 1969 investigate this query 10 matches in a row.. :hysterical::hysterical:....legend
The Outsider Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 India 307 71.4x8 3.22 -28 2 lost v Australia Adelaide 23 Dec 1967 investigate this query India 251 60.2x8 3.12 -146 4 lost v Australia Adelaide 23 Dec 1967 investigate this query India 173 57.4x8 2.25 173 1 lost v Australia Melbourne 30 Dec 1967 investigate this query India 352 84.7x8 3.11 -4 3 lost v Australia Melbourne 30 Dec 1967 investigate this query India 279 100.0x8 2.09 -100 2 lost v Australia Brisbane 19 Jan 1968 investigate this query India 355 109.6x8 2.42 -39 4 lost v Australia Brisbane 19 Jan 1968 investigate this query India 268 85.1x8 2.36 -49 2 lost v Australia Sydney 26 Jan 1968 investigate this query India 197 73.6x8 2.00 -144 4 lost v Australia Sydney 26 Jan 1968 investigate this query India 271 135.4 1.99 271 1 lost v Australia Mumbai (BS) 4 Nov 1969 investigate this query India 137 90.2 1.51 63 3 lost v Australia Mumbai (BS) 4 Nov 1969 investigate this query 10 matches in a row.. Another self pwnage of halaal quality. Can't even count!! :hysterical::hysterical:
vvvslaxman Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 India 307 71.4x8 3.22 -28 2 lost v Australia Adelaide 23 Dec 1967 investigate this query India 251 60.2x8 3.12 -146 4 lost v Australia Adelaide 23 Dec 1967 investigate this query India 173 57.4x8 2.25 173 1 lost v Australia Melbourne 30 Dec 1967 investigate this query India 352 84.7x8 3.11 -4 3 lost v Australia Melbourne 30 Dec 1967 investigate this query India 279 100.0x8 2.09 -100 2 lost v Australia Brisbane 19 Jan 1968 investigate this query India 355 109.6x8 2.42 -39 4 lost v Australia Brisbane 19 Jan 1968 investigate this query India 268 85.1x8 2.36 -49 2 lost v Australia Sydney 26 Jan 1968 investigate this query India 197 73.6x8 2.00 -144 4 lost v Australia Sydney 26 Jan 1968 investigate this query India 271 135.4 1.99 271 1 lost v Australia Mumbai (BS) 4 Nov 1969 investigate this query India 137 90.2 1.51 63 3 lost v Australia Mumbai (BS) 4 Nov 1969 investigate this query 10 matches in a row.. Well.. so you took the bait. wow.. :hysterical: That was easy. :hysterical:
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now