kabira Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 If Review System was not in place, England would have lost today's game by tea. If collingwood had gone early, that meant lower order exposed early and much before new ball was due. Saffers would have wrapped up the game by tea. But thanks heaven review system was there adn Collingwood without any hesitation called for it and rightly he was given not out. Long Live Review System Link to comment
kabira Posted January 7, 2010 Author Share Posted January 7, 2010 no it was Tony Hill. He otherwise had a good game Link to comment
DomainK Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 When will we accept this system?? Link to comment
cowboysfan Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 When will we accept this system?? when will sachin retire? Link to comment
Laaloo Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 When will we accept this system?? After our senior players retire. :isalute: Link to comment
Guest BossBhai Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 -- Removed on request of the user -- Link to comment
kabira Posted January 7, 2010 Author Share Posted January 7, 2010 system is not yet full proof, but its better than having nothing. I have noticed more its used, teams are getting smarter using it. Link to comment
yoda Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 also, in the poyzz vs aussie game there was a very minor nick shown via hot-spot. Link to comment
kabira Posted January 7, 2010 Author Share Posted January 7, 2010 ^yes, that could have been crucial, Sami can be stubborn batsman. Link to comment
Guest BossBhai Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 -- Removed on request of the user -- Link to comment
kabira Posted January 7, 2010 Author Share Posted January 7, 2010 ^I think Bossbhai he ias talking about Sami dismissal, umpire gave not out and Haddin/Ponting immediately called for review Link to comment
achilles Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 ^yes' date=' that could have been crucial, [b']Sami is stubborn. Corrected :giggle: Link to comment
yoda Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 but they did not appeal :haha: no, aussies appealed and got the wicket. it was malcom sami batting as kabira pointed out. Link to comment
The Outsider Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 It has been as successful as any introduction of a new aspect to a game can be. The best thing about it is the "umpire's call" part of it, which gives priority to an on field judgment in case of a doubt. There are still improvements that can be made like making similar technology available in all matches and perhaps reducing the number of incorrect challenges from 2 to 1 per innings, but those are all minor bumps. Overall, it has been a success and I still don't see 2 day test matches that people were anticipating. Link to comment
yoda Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 Malcomn Sami? :(( Yea Sami is referred to fondly as Malcom Sami here cause Imran Khan once compared him to Malcom Marshall. Link to comment
kabira Posted January 7, 2010 Author Share Posted January 7, 2010 It has been as successful as any introduction of a new aspect to a game can be. The best thing about it is the "umpire's call" part of it' date=' which gives priority to an on field judgment in case of a doubt. There are still improvements that can be made like making similar technology available in all matches and perhaps reducing the number of incorrect challenges from 2 to 1 per innings, but those are all minor bumps. Overall, it has been a success and I still don't see 2 day test matches that people were anticipating.[/quote'] I dont think 2 is too many. thats perfect number as of now. I also see ppl walk more now. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now