Guest BossBhai Posted February 25, 2010 Posted February 25, 2010 -- Removed on request of the user --
SachDan Posted February 25, 2010 Posted February 25, 2010 Here's the link to that article http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/cricket/article5365967.ece?token=null&offset=0&page=1
achilles Posted February 25, 2010 Posted February 25, 2010 Yes he did. I understand the Aussie nationalism, but it shouldn't burn their ass if they state the obvious - Sachin is the best batsman to have graced the game.
Anakin Posted February 25, 2010 Posted February 25, 2010 Oh, Alan Donald is of the very same opinion.
Texan Posted February 25, 2010 Posted February 25, 2010 Disagree. Bradman was the greatest and is the greatest!
ViruRulez Posted February 25, 2010 Author Posted February 25, 2010 I think at least everybody agrees that Sachin Tendulkar is the best batsman ever to have played ODI .. Don Bradman had never played ODI so dont know how well he might have been ODIs There are a lot of points in favor of Sachin and a few in favor of Bradman too. But as many told I also personally feel that it is nearly impossible to compare two players who have played in completely different eras with hardly any similarity. I would say both are no.1 in terms of overall best batsman to have graced the game though Sachin is undoubtedly the all time best to have played ODIs.
The Outsider Posted February 25, 2010 Posted February 25, 2010 The topic has been done and dusted with the same old rehashed arguments. However, the way distance by which Bradman was head and shoulders above his peers is a phenomenon that has never been replicated - not only in cricket, but any sport. Now that is a fact, the rest are all opinions everyone is entitled to.
vvvslaxman Posted February 25, 2010 Posted February 25, 2010 The topic has been done and dusted with the same old rehashed arguments. However' date=' the way distance by which Bradman was head and shoulders above his peers is a phenomenon that has never been replicated - not only in cricket, but any sport. Now that is a fact, the rest are all opinions everyone is entitled to.[/quote'] Coming from Nasser it is rare. He never fails to deride Indian players. May be Sachin is an exception.
Ram Posted February 25, 2010 Posted February 25, 2010 Coming from Nasser it is rare. He never fails to deride Indian players. May be Sachin is an exception. Do you actually think all of these guys believe what they say all the time? Almost all cricket authors have an agenda, which changes like color of the seasons. Its been long since I stopped paying attention to what these cricket 'gurus' say, coz its almost impossible to find an independent opinion that is also consistent and well-informed.
vvvslaxman Posted February 25, 2010 Posted February 25, 2010 Do you actually think all of these guys believe what they say all the time? Almost all cricket authors have an agenda, which changes like color of the seasons. Its been long since I stopped paying attention to what these cricket 'gurus' say, coz its almost impossible to find an independent opinion that is also consistent and well-informed. Anytime he uses the words "bouncers and Indians" in the same sentence he goes way way over the top to deride us.
SachDan Posted February 25, 2010 Posted February 25, 2010 Do you actually think all of these guys believe what they say all the time? Almost all cricket authors have an agenda, which changes like color of the seasons. Its been long since I stopped paying attention to what these cricket 'gurus' say, coz its almost impossible to find an independent opinion that is also consistent and well-informed. Warney is an exception though :) Unlike his consistent line and length, even McGrath is inconsistent with his comments..one day he says "Sachin is THE best he ever bowled to" and when another reporter twists the question he would reply "Lara is THE most dangerous batsman" :( Warney consistent as usual
Guest BossBhai Posted February 25, 2010 Posted February 25, 2010 -- Removed on request of the user --
Captain of Bhangra Posted February 25, 2010 Posted February 25, 2010 Wow. I'm not shocked at the claim, I'm shocked at who's said it. Genuinely shocked...
SachDan Posted February 25, 2010 Posted February 25, 2010 As is Boss the no.of Intl runs' date= the no.of shambars etc etc ... and all of that against two seperate generation of super mean , superfast speed merchants ... NOT one of them bowlers from DGB's time can lay claim to any sort of greatness - statistical or otherwise - other than having bowled to him. This is why there is simply no match for the great man but..but he he didn't face them when they were at their SUPREME best :)
satishg Posted February 25, 2010 Posted February 25, 2010 I think Sachin is the greatest sportsperson ever to have played any sport!
Gunner_Mania Posted February 25, 2010 Posted February 25, 2010 Its too difficult to compare players across different era's' date=' just get over it. Its one mans option, maybe its shared by [b']billions of others, but its opinion at the end of the day Corrected.
Karan114 Posted February 25, 2010 Posted February 25, 2010 Sachin Tendulkar is bigger than Don Bradman: Virender Sehwag Where do you rate him among all-time greats? He is the greatest. You can’t compare him to any other cricketer. He is bigger than any cricketer. He is the God of cricket. He is bigger than anyone who has ever held a bat. Bigger than Don Bradman? Yes. He is.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now