Guest Gunner Posted June 21, 2010 Posted June 21, 2010 Wasnt he a hindu who later converted to islam? No.
King Tendulkar Posted June 21, 2010 Posted June 21, 2010 Wasnt he a hindu who later converted to islam? No thats A R Rehman :((
THX_1138 Posted June 21, 2010 Posted June 21, 2010 Solely for comical purposes I should assume maybe its foreplay ahead of angry sex? you never know, rajiv is a strange and twisted man. i hear he drinks the blood of koala bears for breakfast and is known to absorb pleasure from the tears of little babies. i wouldn't wanna meet him on a dark, moonless light in a back alley with a dead end.
nballa Posted June 21, 2010 Posted June 21, 2010 probably the saddest day in the history of the world after the extinction of the dinosaurs. which doesn't matter because dinosaurs did not exist. freedom of speech and hatred has completely been trounced upon by the so called UK "government". what kind of society do we live in where heros are treated as villians, brave men as cowards, peace activists as terrorists. i think india should take a stand and deny the pope a visa.
bharathh Posted June 21, 2010 Posted June 21, 2010 Never heard of this guy until now. Who watches those boring evangelist shows that this guy probably shows up in?
Roshanrocks Posted June 22, 2010 Posted June 22, 2010 i wonder why Shiv Sena is not giving this guy some attention :orderorder:
Gunner_Mania Posted June 22, 2010 Posted June 22, 2010 Supporters of Naik have jumped to his defence by claiming that his more controversial statements, like "Every Muslim should be a terrorist", should be viewed in their proper context: "Every Muslim should be a terrorist. A terrorist is a person who causes terror. The moment a robber sees a policeman he is terrified. A policeman is a terrorist for the robber. Similarly every Muslim should be a terrorist for the antisocial elements of society, such as thieves, dacoits and rapists. Whenever such an antisocial element sees a Muslim, he should be terrified. It is true that the word 'terrorist' is generally used for a person who causes terror among the common people. But a true Muslim should only be a terrorist to selective people ie antisocial elements, and not to the common innocent people. In fact, a Muslim should be a source of peace for innocent people." http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2010/jun/22/zakir-naik-preacher-free-speech :hysterical::hysterical:
seedhi Posted June 22, 2010 Posted June 22, 2010 Canada also bans this bastard! Canada to bar Islamic preacher An Indian Muslim televangelist who was banned from Britain last week for "unacceptable behaviour" will not be allowed into Canada to speak at an upcoming conference in Toronto, sources familiar with the situation have told the National Post. Dr. Zakir Naik, who has said "every Muslim should be a terrorist" and that Jews are "our staunchest enemy," was to headline next month's Journey of Faith Conference -- which is billed as one of North America's largest Islamic conferences and is expected to attract upward of 10,000 people. Dr. Naik, the Mumbaibased founder of Peace TV and a widely respected lecturer in India, has a laundry list of views that could have led to his exclusion from the U.K. and Canada, both of which require an Indian citizen to obtain a visitor visa. The 44-year-old medical doctor recommends capital punishment for homosexuals and the death penalty for those who abandon Islam as their faith. He has said that a man is within his right to beat his wife "lightly," although in a July 2009 YouTube video he cautioned against hitting her on the face or leaving a mark. The "Keep Zakir Naik Out of Canada" Facebook group, which was launched over the weekend, also points out his view that Western women make themselves "more susceptible to rape" by wearing revealing clothing. Among the chief reasons British Home Secretary Theresa May decided to quash Dr. Naik's U.K. speaking tour later this month, however, were comments he made in a widely circulated 2007 video. "If [Osama bin Laden] is fighting the enemies of Islam, I am for him.... "If he is terrorizing a terrorist, if he is terrorizing America the terrorist, the biggest terrorist, I am with him," said Dr. Naik, who has delivered hundreds of talks in India, Canada, the United States and the Middle East. "Every Muslim should be a terrorist." Tarek Fatah, founder of the Muslim Canadian Congress, said he and the congress have been informed that Dr. Naik will be "stopped at the airport," and sources familiar with the situation confirmed Dr. Naik does not have a visa to enter Canada. "We are very happy that government agencies, having been made aware of his statements, have taken this decision," Mr. Fatah said. Mr. Fatah said he sent a mass email to federal MPs last week, warning them of Dr. Naik's views. "We certainly don't want hate-mongers to come here." "To me, the rules as to who can come into this country were written for this kind of person," said Bernie Farber, CEO of the Canadian Jewish Congress. "The comments are highly inflammatory, and highly provocative. When you put them together in one cauldron, you have a stew of hatred." Dr. Naik, president of the Islamic Research Foundation in Mumbai, was reached via email yesterday but would not comment on his pending visit to Toronto. In fact, Dr. Naik may not yet know that he is unwelcome in Canada, sources said. In his email to the National Post, Dr. Naik pointed to a June 20 statement regarding the "overzealous and islamophobic exclusion order" issued by the U.K. The statement seeks to clarify his comments, which the foundation argues were "taken out of context." The Journey of Faith Conference is chaired by Imam Saed Rageah, whose Toronto mosque, the Abu Huraira Centre, made headlines last fall after a group of young worshippers vanished and were feared to have joined a Somali militant group. Imam Ragaeh declined an interview request yesterday, but passed along a Web video via email of Dr. Naik defending his comments and promising to challenge the U.K. ban. According to the Journey of Faith event website, the "hope" of the July 2-4 conference at the downtown Metro Toronto Convention Centre is for Muslims to "renew their forgotten relationship" with the Koran. As of last night, the site still listed Dr. Naik as a featured speaker. Citizenship and Immigration Canada declined to comment on the case yesterday, citing the Privacy Act. http://www.globaltoronto.com/Canada+Islamic+preacher/3185879/story.html
bharathh Posted June 22, 2010 Posted June 22, 2010 Canada also bans this bastard! Is he outside the country? Can we ban him too? B->
seedhi Posted June 22, 2010 Posted June 22, 2010 Surprise surprise, look who is standing up for the bigot Zakir Nair ... yes our Bollywood "secularist" Mahesh Bhatt! F***K this HYPOCRITE! Muslim leader moves HC against ban on UK entry Furious at the United Kingdom for barring his entry, controversial Muslim leader Dr Zakir Naik has decided to initiate legal proceedings in the Bombay High Court to challenge the revocation of his visa and the 'maligning' of his character by Britain's department of home affairs. Dr Naik, accompanied by advocate Majid Memon and noted film maker Mahesh Bhatt [ Images ], made the announcement on Tuesday. Dr Naik, a resident of Mumbai [ Images ], was scheduled to leave for UK on June 18. A day before his departure, the British high commission hand delivered an order revoking his visa that was valid till 2013, on the grounds that his speeches were not conducive for the public. The order had cited four extracts of his speeches, which, according to him, were 'misquoted and out of context'. Dr Naik alleged that the UK home affairs department's decision was a political one. "The decision to revoke my visa was preceded by a news article in The Sunday Times on May 30 titled 'Preacher of Hate'. The article had also quoted me out of context," said Dr Naik. The Sunday Times had reportedly quoted Dr Naik as saying that every Muslim should be a terrorist. "I said this in the context that when a robber sees a policeman, he is terrified. So for a robber, the policeman is a terrorist. So in that context, every Muslim should be a terrorist to the robber and anti-social elements," he explained. He added that he had made this statement during an interview to a newspaper in 2003. The order of the British home affairs had quoted one more extract of a speech in which he had made references to Al Qaeda [ Images ] chief Osama bin Laden [ Images ]. The quotes sourced from You Tube and reproduced in the order read as "Beware of Muslims saying Osama bin Laden is right or wrong, I reject them, we don't know. But if you ask my view, if given the truth, if he is fighting the enemies of Islam, I am for him. I don't know what he is doing. I am not in touch with him. I don't know him personally. I read the newspaper. If he is terrorising the terrorist, if he is terrorising America the terrorist, the biggest terrorist, he is following Islam." Dr Naik said that the order stated that the speech was made in 2006, whereas it was actually made in 1996, when Osama was not very well known. "What I said about Osama was much before the terrorist attacks of 9/11 (in the United States), which I have condemned. My comments about Osama made in the past cannot be linked to recent world events. I have always condemned the killing of innocent people by terrorists," said Dr Naik. In the third extract, Dr Naik has been quoted criticising the killing of people in Iraq, Afghanistan and Lebanon in the same vein as the killing of innocent persons in terror attacks in New York, London [ Images ] and Mumbai. "Is the life of a person in the UK and United States more important than a person dying in other parts of the world such as Iraq, Afghanistan and Lebanon? How am I wrong in saying this," questioned Dr Naik. Memon, a noted lawyer, pointed out that revoking Naik's existing visa was a much more serious matter than refusing a visa. "I cannot digest the fact that the entire home affairs department was blinded unwisely and rashly on this matter. Interestingly, this decision cannot be appealed. I am afraid this is terrorism," he said. Film maker Mahesh Bhatt said that the Centre, which objected to actor Shah Rukh Khan [ Images ] being frisked and detained at a US airport by security officials, should support Dr Naik in this case. http://news.rediff.com/report/2010/jun/22/muslim-leader-moves-hc-against-ban-on-uk-entry.htm
coffee_rules Posted June 22, 2010 Posted June 22, 2010 ^^ f ucking ch ootiya..his Indian passport should be revoked. His son has links with 26/11 terrorists too.
coffee_rules Posted June 22, 2010 Posted June 22, 2010 probably the saddest day in the history of the world after the extinction of the dinosaurs. which doesn't matter because dinosaurs did not exist. freedom of speech and hatred has completely been trounced upon by the so called UK "government". what kind of society do we live in where heros are treated as villians' date= brave men as cowards, peace activists as terrorists. i think india should take a stand and deny the pope a visa. :hysterical: classic.
yoda Posted June 23, 2010 Posted June 23, 2010 How do you quote "Every Muslim should be a terrorist" out of context? :hysterical:
Desi Cartman Posted June 23, 2010 Posted June 23, 2010 How do you quote "Every Muslim should be a terrorist" out of context? :hysterical: He is saying every civil human should inflict terror on evil people.. meaning bad people should be scared of good people. he has a point but its a stupid way of explaining/validating any sort of terrorism :blink:
Sachinism Posted June 23, 2010 Author Posted June 23, 2010 He is saying every civil human should inflict terror on evil people.. meaning bad people should be scared of good people. he has a point but its a stupid way of explaining/validating any sort of terrorism :blink: He's just trying to paint a positive picture of a terrorist. The guy is a sick, manipulative bastard
asterix Posted June 23, 2010 Posted June 23, 2010 Looks like Indian media has now picked up the story. Saw news in NDTV today. But they are projecting it as Naik's rights have been voilated...
Recommended Posts