yoda Posted November 3, 2010 Posted November 3, 2010 And with the Repubs taking control of the Congress' date=' Dems fantasy of passing Cap and Trade has vanished like a tiny rat's fart... [b']For the good it does country and the businesses B-> Just like they did under Bush creating a trillion dollar deficit fighting a useless war and pushing the country into a near depression. B->
Patriot_Nikhil Posted November 3, 2010 Posted November 3, 2010 Just like they did under Bush creating a trillion dollar deficit fighting a useless war and pushing the country into a near depression. B-> Rather, just like they did under Newt's congress, balancing the budget and creating a large surplus!!! :two_thumbs_up:
Patriot_Nikhil Posted November 3, 2010 Posted November 3, 2010 Not quite. He started off well' date=' then started searching for words and finally ended up crying like a baby. :giggle:[/quote'] Emotions come out man... The guy has come up the hard way and he truely believes in what he does... Which is more than can be said for the President mind you... :winky: But then again, opinions differ...
yoda Posted November 3, 2010 Posted November 3, 2010 Emotions come out man... The guy has come up the hard way and he truely believes in what he does... Which is more than can be said for the President mind you... :winky: But then again, opinions differ... Right, I forgot about Robert Obama the 30th President who paved the way for future African American Presidents. :giggle:
Sooda Posted November 3, 2010 Posted November 3, 2010 Can anyone explain to a politics noob the difference between houses and what it means now that Repubs have won the house of congress...I heard that the congress 'controls the pursestrings' so any decision has to be accepted by the house of Congr for it to be law...that roughly true? And also what the Senate (and senators) do,...how does it differ from a governer hmm might just google all that hehe... but any explanations will be rewarded with a :rose: :icflove:
punjabi_khota Posted November 3, 2010 Posted November 3, 2010 Can anyone explain to a politics noob the difference between houses and what it means now that Repubs have won the house of congress...I heard that the congress 'controls the pursestrings' so any decision has to be accepted by the house of Congr for it to be law...that roughly true? And also what the Senate (and senators) do,...how does it differ from a governer hmm might just google all that hehe... but any explanations will be rewarded with a :rose: :icflove: congress=house+senate house gets re-elected every 2 years, with 435 members, and each state having members proportionate to population(e.g. 50 from California to 2 from Montana) House has powers similar to Lok Sabha in the sense that monetary bills need to be introduced first in the House. Senate members have 6 yr term (1/3 are up for election every 2 years) and each state has only 2 members. Senate does confirmation hearings, non-monetary bills etc. More prestigious, obviously. Senators are completely different from governers. Governors are equivalent of chief ministers in India, while senators are MPs.
Sooda Posted November 3, 2010 Posted November 3, 2010 I see. and now republicans have the house, Dems the senate.
Patriot_Nikhil Posted November 3, 2010 Posted November 3, 2010 Right' date=' I forgot about Robert Obama the 30th President who paved the way for future African American Presidents. :giggle:[/quote'] What does Obama's significance have anything to do with Boehner's emotions? :headshake:
ravishingravi Posted November 3, 2010 Posted November 3, 2010 Personally don't have any stake in the elections, but the political discourse in the US elections is so appalling, yet entertaining for someone like me. Almost every pertinent issue can reduced the a shouting contest by the media who essentially does the propaganda for the parties. To be honest, Republicans should be in power, for they truly are better representatives of the dumb electorate. Either way nothing is going to change.
punjabi_khota Posted November 3, 2010 Posted November 3, 2010 Personally don't have any stake in the elections' date=' but the political discourse in the US elections is so appalling, yet entertaining for someone like me. Almost every pertinent issue can reduced the a shouting contest by the media who essentially does the propaganda for the parties. To be honest, Republicans should be in power, for they truly are better representatives of the dumb electorate. [b']Either way nothing is going to change. Thats a fatalistic view. If you have been following closely, a LOT of things have changed in 2 years. The dems have passed a whole lot of bills, despite the "party of no" fillibustering every damn thing. Health care, and Credit cards regulations affect a lot of people I know. Now there are fears Rand Paul, high as he is on tea, could filibuster the raising of national debt ceiling, leading to US govt. defaulting on loans. :hysterical:
Patriot_Nikhil Posted November 3, 2010 Posted November 3, 2010 Thats a fatalistic view. If you have been following closely' date=' a LOT of things have changed in 2 years. [b']The dems have passed a whole lot of bills, despite the "party of no" fillibustering every damn thing. Health care, and Credit cards regulations affect a lot of people I know. Including a host of highly unpopular and leftist ideological ones which is why they just got their butts whipped and lost the highest number of seats since 1948!!! :cheer:
yoda Posted November 3, 2010 Posted November 3, 2010 Emotions come out man... The guy has come up the hard way and he truely believes in what he does... Which is more than can be said for the President mind you... :winky: But then again, opinions differ... What does Obama's significance have anything to do with Boehner's emotions? :headshake: Looks like you responded to your own comment. :winky:
Patriot_Nikhil Posted November 3, 2010 Posted November 3, 2010 Looks like you responded to your own comment. :winky: Ah Yoda, either you did not understand what i said or i didn put it forth clearly... I bought the Pres in not to mean he didnt fight his way, but to opine that he does not truely believe his own policies. :two_thumbs_up:
yoda Posted November 3, 2010 Posted November 3, 2010 Ah Yoda' date=' either you did not understand what i said or i didn put it forth clearly... I bought the Pres in not to mean he didnt fight his way, but to opine that [b']he does not truely believe his own policies. :two_thumbs_up: correct, repubs believe in what they do, whereas dems just sleepwalk and do whatever random thought comes to their mind at any given time, which ofc they don't believe in. :two_thumbs_up:
Patriot_Nikhil Posted November 3, 2010 Posted November 3, 2010 correct' date=' repubs believe in what they do, whereas dems just sleepwalk and do whatever random thought comes to their mind at any given time, which ofc they don't believe in. :two_thumbs_up:[/quote'] :hatsoff:
Cricketics Posted November 3, 2010 Posted November 3, 2010 Martin O Malley retains his dominance.. Win for him in Maryland.
yoda Posted November 3, 2010 Posted November 3, 2010 BTW even after all this "victory", 2/3 of govt still controlled by Dems atleast for 2 more years. :winky: The closest the Repubs will come to accomplishing anything would be to try repeal anything Obama has done, only to see it stop at the Senate or end up getting Vetoed. :yay:
punjabi_khota Posted November 3, 2010 Posted November 3, 2010 Including a host of highly unpopular and leftist ideological ones which is why they just got their butts whipped and lost the highest number of seats since 1948!!! :cheer: Thats not true at all. They lost mainly because 10% people are still unemployed. You think the 30 million people who are bound to get insured hated the "leftist" ideology ?:giggle:
Patriot_Nikhil Posted November 3, 2010 Posted November 3, 2010 BTW even after all this "victory"' date=' [b']2/3 of govt still controlled by Dems atleast for 2 more years. :winky: The closest the Repubs will come to accomplishing anything would be to try repeal anything Obama has done, only to see it stop at the Senate or end up getting Vetoed. :yay: Err, not really... Like i previously pointed out the 3 branches of the Govt are split right to the middle. Legislative - 1/2 and 1/2 Executive - Liberal Judicial - Conservatives by 5-4
Patriot_Nikhil Posted November 3, 2010 Posted November 3, 2010 Thats not true at all. They lost mainly because 10% people are still unemployed. Huge factor, agreed. You think the 30 million people who are bound to get insured hated the "leftist" ideology ?:giggle: More than half of the people that are paying their taxes so that bums and illegals can get covered certainly are pissed!!! :winky:
Recommended Posts