Zelig Posted December 28, 2010 Posted December 28, 2010 NOPE! Their bowling is top notch, can't say the same about their batting. They got some way to go.
Sir john Posted December 28, 2010 Posted December 28, 2010 It is a big joke that eng is world number one team.
Sachin=GOD Posted December 28, 2010 Posted December 28, 2010 It is a big joke that eng is world number one team. in which form of the game (tests, ODI or T20) are they no 1 :hmmm:
The Outsider Posted December 28, 2010 Posted December 28, 2010 England and India's first choice bowling attacks are quite similar in strength. Anderson-Zaheer, Broad-Ishant, Swann-Harbhajan are bowlers of similar ability and it just depends on the conditions and form they are playing in, as to who is better. In English conditions, England would have the advantage of their third seamer being better than the Indian third seamer and in Indian conditions India hold the advantage with their second spinner being better than the second spinner from England. The only attack which stands out of the pack is South Africa. For the simple Steyn factor - miles and miles away as the best bowler in the world.
The Outsider Posted December 28, 2010 Posted December 28, 2010 Please don't start flame wars on culture, countries, and origin of players. This thread is to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the English cricket team, which takes the field.
Laaloo Posted December 28, 2010 Posted December 28, 2010 Well he is averaging a whopping 60 in this series, and going at 4.5 an over. He would never get anywhere near the England team, ever. Really, him and draco malfoy have similar averages considering the fact that daddy's little girl bowled a lot on bowler friendly pitches.
Serani Posted December 28, 2010 Posted December 28, 2010 Really' date=' him and draco malfoy have similar averages considering the fact that daddy's little girl bowled a lot on bowler friendly pitches.[/quote'] Broad is improving all the time, Ishant has gone backwards. And Broad can bat.
Laaloo Posted December 28, 2010 Posted December 28, 2010 Broad is improving all the time, Ishant has gone backwards. And Broad can bat. Improving in what? Ball tampering and getting his ass saved by his daddy?
jf1gp_1 Posted December 28, 2010 Posted December 28, 2010 Ind beat eng in both home and away test series good bye
Shakthi Posted December 28, 2010 Posted December 28, 2010 Improving in what? Ball tampering and getting his ass saved by his daddy? Where did Broad learn ball tampering ?
jhakati Posted December 28, 2010 Posted December 28, 2010 england is the 4th best test team currently behind india, SA and SL.
TapSumBong Posted December 28, 2010 Posted December 28, 2010 Batting: India > England Bowling: England >>> India Fielding England >>> India. So I say England on current form are #1 and the side to beat in the world today.
yoda Posted December 28, 2010 Posted December 28, 2010 Batting: India > England Bowling: England >>> India Fielding England >>> India. So I say England on current form are #1 and the side to beat in the world today. So fielding is the deal breaker here? :giggle: BTW Batting should read: India >>>>>> England and bowling depends on where the games are held. If in Eng, yes Adv Eng, if held in India Adv Ind.
jhakati Posted December 28, 2010 Posted December 28, 2010 Batting: India > England Bowling: England >>> India Fielding England >>> India. So I say England on current form are #1 and the side to beat in the world today. SL has a better batting and bowling lineup than england, england is no.4 behind india, SA and SL
Manny_Pacquiao Posted December 28, 2010 Posted December 28, 2010 pointless discussion really, everyone knows india are the best side in the world right now. england are not far behind either and have developed a powerful test side. thats where the debate ends. nobody knows whats gonna happen 2 yers from now and bowling depends on where the games are held. If in Eng' date=' yes Adv Eng.[/quote'] highly debatable considering india have more than matched england in their last two test series there in 2002 and 2007
Serani Posted December 28, 2010 Posted December 28, 2010 SL has a better batting and bowling lineup than england' date=' england is no.4 behind india, SA and SL[/quote'] :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: SL's bowling is shambolic! There pacers make Indias look like world beaters, and they havent got any Muralis to chuck the opposition out anymore.
TapSumBong Posted December 28, 2010 Posted December 28, 2010 So fielding is the deal breaker here? :giggle: BTW Batting should read: India >>>>>> England and bowling depends on where the games are held. If in Eng, yes Adv Eng, if held in India Adv Ind. England bowling is much better than India's anywhere in the world including in India. Swann can be very handy in Indian conditions as well. England's batting looks much better than 2008 series in India. So, even though India's batting is better its only just.
Zap_Brannigan Posted December 28, 2010 Posted December 28, 2010 England bowling is much better than India's anywhere in the world including in India. Swann can be very handy in Indian conditions as well. England's batting looks much better than 2008 series in India. So, even though India's batting is better its only just. You know, back in 90's there was this great spinner whom everybody thought would conquer India. He averaged 50 in India. Then in the 2000's,the greatest spinner in the world was supposed to help his team win their first test in India. He retired without ever having done that. The proof of the pudding is in the eating. You can go on about how hypothetically England would beat India anywhere but in reality it is India that has beaten England home and away. The onus is on England to prove otherwise.
TapSumBong Posted December 28, 2010 Posted December 28, 2010 You know, back in 90's there was this great spinner whom everybody thought would conquer India. He averaged 50 in India. Then in the 2000's,the greatest spinner in the world was supposed to help his team win their first test in India. He retired without ever having done that. The proof of the pudding is in the eating. You can go on about how hypothetically England would beat India anywhere but in reality it is India that has beaten England home and away. The onus is on England to prove otherwise. Cannot disagree with anything you say. I never said England would beat India or whatever but just commenting on the current strength of the sides. My point is England is a better balanced and stronger team at the moment. They have more variety in bowling and a reliable batting compared to India.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now