Jump to content

England- Best Team in the World ?


Recommended Posts

Posted

England and India's first choice bowling attacks are quite similar in strength. Anderson-Zaheer, Broad-Ishant, Swann-Harbhajan are bowlers of similar ability and it just depends on the conditions and form they are playing in, as to who is better. In English conditions, England would have the advantage of their third seamer being better than the Indian third seamer and in Indian conditions India hold the advantage with their second spinner being better than the second spinner from England. The only attack which stands out of the pack is South Africa. For the simple Steyn factor - miles and miles away as the best bowler in the world.

Posted
Well he is averaging a whopping 60 in this series, and going at 4.5 an over. He would never get anywhere near the England team, ever.
Really, him and draco malfoy have similar averages considering the fact that daddy's little girl bowled a lot on bowler friendly pitches.
Posted
Really' date=' him and draco malfoy have similar averages considering the fact that daddy's little girl bowled a lot on bowler friendly pitches.[/quote'] Broad is improving all the time, Ishant has gone backwards. And Broad can bat.
Posted
Broad is improving all the time, Ishant has gone backwards. And Broad can bat.
Improving in what? Ball tampering and getting his ass saved by his daddy?
Posted
Batting: India > England Bowling: England >>> India Fielding England >>> India. So I say England on current form are #1 and the side to beat in the world today.
So fielding is the deal breaker here? :giggle: BTW Batting should read: India >>>>>> England and bowling depends on where the games are held. If in Eng, yes Adv Eng, if held in India Adv Ind.
Posted
Batting: India > England Bowling: England >>> India Fielding England >>> India. So I say England on current form are #1 and the side to beat in the world today.
SL has a better batting and bowling lineup than england, england is no.4 behind india, SA and SL
Posted

pointless discussion really, everyone knows india are the best side in the world right now. england are not far behind either and have developed a powerful test side. thats where the debate ends. nobody knows whats gonna happen 2 yers from now

and bowling depends on where the games are held. If in Eng' date=' yes Adv Eng.[/quote'] highly debatable considering india have more than matched england in their last two test series there in 2002 and 2007
Posted
SL has a better batting and bowling lineup than england' date=' england is no.4 behind india, SA and SL[/quote'] :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: SL's bowling is shambolic! There pacers make Indias look like world beaters, and they havent got any Muralis to chuck the opposition out anymore.
Posted
So fielding is the deal breaker here? :giggle: BTW Batting should read: India >>>>>> England and bowling depends on where the games are held. If in Eng, yes Adv Eng, if held in India Adv Ind.
England bowling is much better than India's anywhere in the world including in India. Swann can be very handy in Indian conditions as well. England's batting looks much better than 2008 series in India. So, even though India's batting is better its only just.
Posted
England bowling is much better than India's anywhere in the world including in India. Swann can be very handy in Indian conditions as well. England's batting looks much better than 2008 series in India. So, even though India's batting is better its only just.
You know, back in 90's there was this great spinner whom everybody thought would conquer India. He averaged 50 in India. Then in the 2000's,the greatest spinner in the world was supposed to help his team win their first test in India. He retired without ever having done that. The proof of the pudding is in the eating. You can go on about how hypothetically England would beat India anywhere but in reality it is India that has beaten England home and away. The onus is on England to prove otherwise.
Posted
You know, back in 90's there was this great spinner whom everybody thought would conquer India. He averaged 50 in India. Then in the 2000's,the greatest spinner in the world was supposed to help his team win their first test in India. He retired without ever having done that. The proof of the pudding is in the eating. You can go on about how hypothetically England would beat India anywhere but in reality it is India that has beaten England home and away. The onus is on England to prove otherwise.
Cannot disagree with anything you say. I never said England would beat India or whatever but just commenting on the current strength of the sides. My point is England is a better balanced and stronger team at the moment. They have more variety in bowling and a reliable batting compared to India.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...