Jump to content

You should also make fair pitches for KO games


zen

Recommended Posts

Posted
This is not about Pakistan only. I want asian blood on pitch in 2015 WC. Seeing part timers like Yuvi' date='Hafeez & Dilshan getting loads of wickets is mockery of WC. :weights:[/quote'] Why is it a mockery of WC if thats the case then we should also add Afridi to the list just say that they deserved those wickets you cant take credit away from them computer angel
Posted
Why is it a mockery of WC if thats the case then we should also add Afridi to the list just say that they deserved those wickets you cant take credit away from them computer angel
Afridi is a specialist bowler who has ability to do good anywhere. But only in these spinner friendly conditions part timers have been unplayable.
Posted
Afridi is a specialist bowler who has ability to do good anywhere. But only in these spinner friendly conditions part timers have been unplayable.
But in seaming conditions, part timers like Bopara would do well too, no? That doesn't solve the long term quest to have fair conditions :winky:
Posted
Afridi is a specialist bowler who has ability to do good anywhere. But only in these spinner friendly conditions part timers have been unplayable.
They did their job so i will give credit to them
Posted
Afridi is a specialist bowler who has ability to do good anywhere. But only in these spinner friendly conditions part timers have been unplayable.
Averaged 45 in 2010 :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
Posted
Averaged 45 in 2010 :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
Your spontaneous replies are brilliant man :icflove::hatsoff:
Posted
This is not about Pakistan only. I want asian blood on pitch in 2015 WC. Seeing part timers like Yuvi' date='Hafeez & Dilshan getting loads of wickets is mockery of WC. [/quote'] Of course, I can already see this coming. When Australia, England and South Africa lose, its the poor pitches in the sub continent to be blamed but when sub continent teams go there and struggle in their conditions we are just not good enough to play on their pitches. The hypocrisy...:headshake:
Posted
Players should always be ready for all kind of conditions.
Theoretically yes, if the conditions are equal for both teams throughout the game. But if they are 'tailored' to help one team in particular then it doesn't make much sense to me in a KO game in a marque tourney. I believe that conditions should be fair or sporting enough that there is something in it for just about everyone Moving forward, theoretically, I don't want an absolutely flat surface nor a turner or a green surface. But a surface that has enough it it for just abt everyone :nice: .... Practically, it may not possible to have completely fair conditions (due to various reasons), but at least try to make it as fair as possible Personally, I like to play in conditions that favor the other team and beat the crap out of that team in that condition. That's domination for me. Next thing, I would prefer is sporting conditions. The last thing I would prefer is conditions helping me the most because there is not much challenge in that
Posted
But in seaming conditions' date=' part timers like Bopara would do well too, no? That doesn't solve the long term quest to have fair conditions :winky:[/quote'] Very good answer. In seaming conditions, Bopara would do well, In spinning tracks Dilshan would do well, In flat roads all the bowlers would get hammered. There is no clear solution. So if u can't play spin please shut the **** up. :two_thumbs_up:
Posted
Teams like SA' date='Aus & WI were hard done by biased pitches in this mega tournament. Only ICC groundsmen should prepare neutral pitches in World Cups. I hope in 2015 WC, Aus & NZ take revenge from asian teams by preparing swinging,bouncy pitches.[/quote'] isn't spin part of cricket. And talking about part timers like Yuvraj, hafeez taking wickets, it clearly shows the inability of other teams to handle spin. World cup is in sub continent, Other teams hsould have prepared according to that. If they were expecting tracks which will help their fast bowlers, then they were fools.
Posted
I agree but I am using the term pitch as a metaphor for playing conditions (both pitch and conditions or whatever). When implied for conditions, the conclusion would be to play day games to make it a bit more fair than playing D/N I could understand BD making pitches (metaphor) where toss plays a vital role but not for teams like Ind or SL. Let's take SL vs NZ for example. With conditions being fair, you would expect SL to beat NZ a bit more easily but at Premdasa, you can't be that sure because you know toss plays a role there. Even though the conditions are suppose to help SL more, they give NZ more chance then it would otherwise have had too. Irrespective of the home advantage, I like conditions to be fair anyways. I hope in future we get to see fair conditions in high marque value tourneys irrespective of where it is being played :nice:
BTW, I read this article which says they have made changes to the Premadasa pitch to avoid one sided run chases : http://www.espncricinfo.com/icc_cricket_worldcup2011/content/current/story/508196.html
However, for the year and a half running into the World Cup, they stopped playing here. As they renovated the stands, they also tried to figure out what they could do to address that imbalance. They realised that because the ground is in a low-lying area, the moisture comes up in the evenings and assists seam movement. So they raised the square by three-and-a-half feet, and also installed new, improved floodlights. Hosting a World Cup is a matter of prestige, and nobody would have wanted two unfair knockout matches in Sri Lanka.
Posted
BTW, I read this article which says they have made changes to the Premadasa pitch to avoid one sided run chases : http://www.espncricinfo.com/icc_cricket_worldcup2011/content/current/story/508196.html
I must say that's a good start but I guess playing a day game would make it even more even Even though SL managed to get 230 easily, I felt that a slightly more focused and smart fielding and bowling effort could have given SL a run for its money. Watching the teams bat 2nd makes you feel that it is easy for them to lose 4-5 wkts for 50 runs. Guys who get themselves in have to finish the job. At Premdesa, batting 2nd you feel that a team could get into trouble if the set batsman leaves the job for someone else to finish

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...