Ramzz Posted June 27, 2011 Posted June 27, 2011 ^^ We are talking about the UDRS in this thread. If you want to bring up other systems then you can open another thread.
mishra Posted June 27, 2011 Posted June 27, 2011 ^^ We are talking about the UDRS in this thread. If you want to bring up other systems then you can open another thread. :hysterical: :hysterical: :hysterical: Wasnt you who brought Sachins name and our world cup victory on this thread.
1983-2011 Posted June 27, 2011 Posted June 27, 2011 majority of umpires decisons overturned by UDRS are of LBWs
1983-2011 Posted June 27, 2011 Posted June 27, 2011 Swann will be crying now because theres no Hawkeye:((
mishra Posted June 27, 2011 Posted June 27, 2011 Swanny boy isnt that bad.... If he can strike Lankans he can strike us..... Unless we go prepared (our team and players pre read Swans action frequency and general attitutude towards mixing ball) for him, I think he is going to be a big pain
coffee_rules Posted June 27, 2011 Posted June 27, 2011 is there alternative to hawk eye Yes, the umpires will still rule on LBWs.
ganeshran Posted June 27, 2011 Posted June 27, 2011 Dont worry, padosis will find something else to cry about.
NareshK Posted June 27, 2011 Posted June 27, 2011 I think Hot Spot/Snicko should also be used when there may have been an edge in lbw decisions. Also, the replay should be used for finding if ball pitched outside leg or struck batsman outside off stump. Then, the howlers can be completely eliminated. LBW decisions should always be under the purview of the on field umpire. As it stands, just the use of Hot Spot/Snicko is a great way forward.
Karan114 Posted June 27, 2011 Posted June 27, 2011 I think Hot Spot/Snicko should also be used when there may have been an edge in lbw decisions. Also' date=' the replay should be used for finding if ball pitched outside leg or struck batsman outside off stump. Then, the howlers can be completely eliminated. LBW decisions should always be under the purview of the on field umpire. As it stands, just the use of Hot Spot/Snicko is a great way forward.[/quote'] Snicko isn't feasible - it takes a few minutes for the reading to come through.
Cricket Tragic Posted June 27, 2011 Posted June 27, 2011 Apparently, batsmen are now greasing the edges of their bat to fool Hot Spot.
mishra Posted June 27, 2011 Posted June 27, 2011 Really. Can a well oiled bat miss the hot spot? Are you serious?
urbestfriend Posted June 27, 2011 Posted June 27, 2011 Hmmm..Did BCCI agree to this proposal when Hotspot costs more than Hawkeye, how is it economically viable.? Anyway something is better than nothing.
cowboysfan Posted June 27, 2011 Posted June 27, 2011 i am a frigging genius,i suggested yesterday that the bcci might force them to dump hawkeye and i was right!!!
mishra Posted June 27, 2011 Posted June 27, 2011 i am a frigging genius' date='i suggested yesterday that the bcci might force them to dump hawkeye and i was right!!![/quote'] :cantstop:
Cricket Tragic Posted June 27, 2011 Posted June 27, 2011 http://www.indiancricketfans.com/showpost.php?p=1537202&postcount=18
cowboysfan Posted June 27, 2011 Posted June 27, 2011 this is a star for bcci,this SHOULD eliminate a lot of howlers but will do nothing for LBWs.
Stuge Posted June 27, 2011 Posted June 27, 2011 whats the use of DRS without including LBW :facepalm:
cowboysfan Posted June 27, 2011 Posted June 27, 2011 most LBW udrs reviews are more in hope anyway,the independent study commisioned by icc will hopefully convince everybody that hawkeye is accurate.
Cricket Tragic Posted June 27, 2011 Posted June 27, 2011 whats the use of DRS without including LBW :facepalm: Inside egde LBW Caught behind Inside edge catches (esp on the SC)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now