Jump to content

We are not number one


flamy

Recommended Posts

Posted
If weather did not interfere India would have taken this series 3-0. A good gutsy knock by Chanderpaul and F Edwards. The opponents showed good fight, appreciate that and move on. Bottom line, weather dictated the score line. Doesn't matter if it were Aussies of the past or WI from 1970s they would not have had control over the weather, full stop.
+1 .... Yup, weather played a key role in this series
Posted
lmao @ ppl who think we could have chased that down with pinch hitters' date=' intent etc etc ...[/quote'] Not saying, we would have won this definitely, but at least should have given it a try. I mean, whats the harm in trying ? If we lost early wicket, we could have then decided to play out and draw the game, but it was worth trying under 6 an over.
Posted

didnt we lose wicket early? 1st ball?? raina at the crease in the 1st over wouldnt do any good...this is test cricket,not odi with fielding rules and pp's..

Posted
didnt we lose wicket early? 1st ball?? raina at the crease in the 1st over wouldnt do any good...this is test cricket,not odi with fielding rules and pp's..
No I meant, in the last 15 overs, we should have tried it at least for a couple of overs just to see if it works, if it doesn't and we lost an early wicket, then we could have stopped, but just shaking hands in a situation where we had a chance was unreasonable. May be you are right about the field placings and stuff and its ot an ODI Cricket. But giving a try was never going to harm us. Was it ?
Posted
That first ball Mukund wicket was the biggest setback today & put the team in the negative mode and couple of wickets fell later on..so M just played safe... these are the times when you miss Sehwag the most..and also like Ravi mentioned..rain screwed us pretty bad
When did rain screw us? With 8 wickets down we were in a very good situation. Don't blame on factors appearing in first 3 days. Rain didn't led to the draw. Edwards and Chanders batted for 35+ overs for 9th wicket. That and India's intention to draw was the reason for this result.
Posted

90 overs were wasted in rain. that is one full day. And remember our bowlers have been playing for 3 back to back tests, hardly any rest of them. Intensity goes down, same thng happened in SA, even steyn and morkel were down for the 3rd Test. I agree we should have gone for it. I mean after raina they should have sent Bhajji, then Dhoni, and kohli, after this 3 got out, shut the shop.

Posted
90 overs were wasted in rain. that is one full day. And remember our bowlers have been playing for 3 back to back tests, hardly any rest of them. Intensity goes down, same thng happened in SA, even steyn and morkel were down for the 3rd Test. I agree we should have gone for it. I mean after raina they should have sent Bhajji, then Dhoni, and kohli, after this 3 got out, shut the shop.
It would have been ok, if they sent Bhajji and decided to go for the draw after his dismissal. Still 4 batsman left for spending an hour.
Posted

:wall: :wall: WTF is wrong with Wall, first put down catches, and now while thr RRR is just 3.8 plays a knock of less than 40 SR.And what was theneed to call it off, maybe we would have just carried on, WE still had Kohli,MSD,Bhajji to come, and we still could have tried, and maybe with wickets in hand, we could have chased down 70 in last 10. :wall: :wall: :wall: :wall:

Posted
Bah, you'd never see Steve Waugh or Allan Border make such a gutless decision. No 1 based on current lot of teams, you no doubt but there's a lot left to be desired.
Yeah right. Like he did in these instances, went for personal glory and ended up drawing the test? http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/63446.html Gave a target of 261 in 30 odd overs and rather went for his own 100, declared when he was on 100* Every captain in the past has made similar decisions of playing it safe with a lead in hand and series already in bag. We can keep questioning the logic behind it but to extend the argument further and call it gutless, phattoo mentality etc is stretching it too far IMO.
Posted

No. 1 but can't make 86 off 90

Only 86 runs to get in 15 overs with seven wickets in hand! Any team would have risked that for a Test win. Ironically, the No. 1 Test team chose not to, more out of fear than sanity. A run-rate of less than six runs per over, albeit in a Test, can be swallowed by hitters like Suresh Raina, Virat Kohli and captain Dhoni himself. And Rahul Dravid is still eager to play the IPL. So why didn't they go for it?
http://cricketnext.in.com/news/3rd-test-no-1-but-cant-make-86-off-90/58670-13.html

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...