Dravid decision

[Cricket Tragic]

He is just trolling. Stop wasting your time.

[Sachinism]

the fact that snicko had a nick showing is irrelevant. he didnt have that available to him when he made the decision.

This. We need a standardized set of rules. How the **** can the 3rd umpire could change that decision is beyond belief. The **** needs to understand what his role is

[CrazyCric]

Idiot' date=' 3rd umpire can't go by his gut feeling when he's overturning an on field decision, he needs to have solid evidence.[/quote'] No ,there aren't any rule saying he cannot use his gut feeling . It's a gray area .

[CrazyCric]

He is just trolling. Stop wasting your time.

No sir i'm not trolling

[ShanS]

It wasn't bad decision ' date='3rd umpire went with his[b'] gut feeling and he was right .Technology is there to help him at the same time he can use his brain too .Otherwise there is no point having a human to make that decision .

Might be his privates, ala Danda. you'll never know.:--D And from when did 'feelings' started to be a part of DRS??Can he provide evidence for his 'feelings'? No? Then on-field umpires decision stays. Simple.

[rkt.india]

there was no deviation, not seam rotation at all too. how it was edged then. I feel Dravid too was not convinced about the decision.

[CG]

You cannot overturn decisons on gut. Instinct,snicko is not used as it is inaccurate.you need clear evidence to overturn.erasmus has messed it.

[Cricket Tragic]

You cannot overturn decisons on gut. Instinct' date=snicko is not used as it is inaccurate.you need clear evidence to overturn.erasmus has messed it.

No, it is not used because it takes time.

[coffee_rules]

Blondie reviewed the decision. Enough evidence for third umpire to give it out. Also, the umpire relied on the speed at which Dravid turned his neck to look if wktkeeper caught the ball. Enough evidence.

[CG]

No' date=' it is not used because it takes time.[/quote'] No it not only takes time but picks up all noises around the stump its hard to differentiate noises

[Cricket Tragic]

No it not only takes time but picks up all noises around the stump its hard to differentiate noises

That is not the reason why it's not used though.

[Sachinism]

No' date=' it is not used because it takes time.[/quote'] And its unreliable. Dileep Premachandran just tweeted about ICC members don't have faith in the snicko system - most unreliable of the lot

[Cricket Tragic]

And its unreliable. Dileep Premachandran just tweeted about ICC members don't have faith in the snicko system - most unreliable of the lot

That it is but it would have been used along with HS if it wasn't for the time factor.

[Number]

No sir i'm not trolling

go and troll in some Aussie forum.

[ravsdh]

It wasn't bad decision ' date='3rd umpire went with his gut feeling and he was right .Technology is there to help him at the same time he can use his brain too .Otherwise there is no point having a human to make that decision .[/quote'] NO NO NO upon referral, the biggest weighting is given to the ORIGINAL on field decision there has to be conclusive evidence to overturn it where was it? there was none end of discussion

[jaggadaku]

It wasn't bad decision ' date='3rd umpire went with his gut feeling and he was right .Technology is there to help him at the same time he can use his brain too .Otherwise there is no point having a human to make that decision .[/quote'] Third umpire is not supposed to give decision based on his gut feeling that's the job of the on field umpire that's why most marginal LBW decision stay with onfield umpire