deathmonger Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 Pakistan should play India at neutral venue or even in India. Indian team is on decline and this is good oppurtunity to extend our lead in overall tests & ODIs record. Yeah, we'll send Saurabh Tiwary, Bisla and MAyank agarwal to UAE. **** Paki trundlers won't be able to take Tiwary's wicket and he can maintain his infinite average.
panther Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 Yeah' date=' we'll send Saurabh Tiwary, Bisla and MAyank agarwal to UAE. **** Paki trundlers won't be able to take Tiwary's wicket and he can maintain his infinite average.[/quote'] are trundlers are better than your phassst bowlers
deathmonger Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 are trundlers are better than your phassst bowlers since you are asking me a question i'll reply politely - no they aren't.
deathmonger Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 DM - Iggy the troll. No man it's too much fun. Thing is Pakistan do so much **** that every troll post by a Paki can be used to get back at it's poster.
deathmonger Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 yes they are No they aren't. We produced first great fast bowler from subcontinent before Pakistan. The great Mohammad Nissar. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Nissar
Iconoclast Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 Hello .. didn't the BCCI hear that Amir and Asif are banned ? So I guess they can quit playing chicken like they did when India previously refused to play Pakistan when the two W's were in full flow. :isalute::theman: Quit being losers and man up.
deathmonger Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 Hello .. didn't the BCCI hear that Amir and Asif are banned ? So I guess they can quit playing chicken like they did when India previously refused to play Pakistan when the two W's were in full flow. :isalute::theman: Quit being losers and man up. Naah, BCCI doesn't want their team to waste time on series with a minnow team like Pakistan (where India will win every match) when the players can take much needed rest or training for future important series. We may send an India A side consisting of Valthaty, Saurabh Tiwary, Mayank Agarwal, Bisla etc. That'll be a more fair contest.
Manny_Pacquiao Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 Hello .. didn't the BCCI hear that Amir and Asif are banned ? So I guess they can quit playing chicken like they did when India previously refused to play Pakistan when the two W's were in full flow. :isalute::theman: Quit being losers and man up. india played more ODIs against the pakis than they did against any other country in the 90s. secondly, pakis also cancelled two tours of india, long before india even entertained the idea of telling the pakis to piss off. finally, aamir got his cherry popped by harbhajan singh, a tailender, in the asia cup game...and asif averages a princely 45 against india in ODIs. keep acting brave though, its hugely entertaining. we all know that within 5 minutes of the match starting, you will start bending over and the famous DUAS will be out in full force...'YA ALLAH MADAD, YA ALLAH MADAD, YA ALLAH MADAD'. :haha::haha:
Hur Rizvi Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 No they aren't. We produced first great fast bowler from subcontinent before Pakistan. The great Mohammad Nissar. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Nissar No he wasnt that great Fazal Mahmood was the first great fast bowler from Subcontinent.... To be called great your average should be less than 25
Hur Rizvi Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 india played more ODIs against the pakis than they did against any other country in the 90s. secondly, pakis also cancelled two tours of india, long before india even entertained the idea of telling the pakis to piss off. finally, aamir got his cherry popped by harbhajan singh, a tailender, in the asia cup game...and asif averages a princely 45 against india in ODIs. keep acting brave though, its hugely entertaining. we all know that within 5 minutes of the match starting, you will start bending over and the famous DUAS will be out in full force...'YA ALLAH MADAD, YA ALLAH MADAD, YA ALLAH MADAD'. :haha::haha: We are discussing cricket here not "Religion" Kindly stick to cricket if you cant refrain to comment in this thread
Hur Rizvi Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 I apologize if I came across as being harsh. But consider this scenario : You have a neighbor.He has a little kid and you have a little kid.Its your kid's B'day party and you invite everybody including him for it. The party goes off well but later on, you realize that your neighbor has been bad-mouthing you behind your back to the rest of the guests and I mean,saying really horrible things about you.However,Hes all praises in front of you. Would you invite that neighbor the next time around ?You can't just invite the kid without inviting him as well.Its not his kid's fault but would you repeat the mistake? Think about it. Governments should tackle their issues themselves.... No need to terminate cricketing ties because of politics no matter how much issues are there... If Pakistan cricket team cancome and play W.C semifinal in India then why not a full-fletched series?? And also our hockey team toured India last year for the W.C and Kabbadi team is Playing in India... JUst for the sake of political point scoring governments should not deny cricket fans of some intresting cricket
ganeshran Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 Mixing politics with sports is not something new in the subcontinent. Pakistan refused to tour India post 1992 because of the Babri Masjid demolition. And that was something which was not even the concern of Pakistan
Hur Rizvi Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 Mixing politics with sports is not something new in the subcontinent. Pakistan refused to tour India post 1992 because of the Babri Masjid demolition. And that was something which was not even the concern of Pakistan I think we should forget past and move forward.... Playing cricket with each other wont hurt anyone just would provide entertainment to fans
ganeshran Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 I think we should forget past and move forward.... Playing cricket with each other wont hurt anyone just would provide entertainment to fans That would be the ideal position. Unfortunately politics does have a bearing on other aspects of the relationship. The mutual trust just isnt there for a friendly series like in 2004, 2006 etc. India's position changed only after the Mumbai attacks. There was no unreasonable moves from our side before the attacks, in fact co-operation was at a high and relationship between both countries were good.
akshayxyz Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 I think we should forget past and move forward.... Playing cricket with each other wont hurt anyone just would provide entertainment to fans SriLanka tried that. Everyone saw what happened to them. We can't just leave sportsmen's lives to chance.
Hur Rizvi Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 SriLanka tried that. Everyone saw what happened to them. We can't just leave sportsmen's lives to chance. :facepalm: Who is asking you to tour PAkistan. Just resume cricket ties b/w the two teams. Pakistan as said is ready to take the first step and tour India... And after that PAkistan's home series can be played at neutral venue like UAE,Bangladesh or Srilanka
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now