Sid Posted November 20, 2011 Posted November 20, 2011 OP can you please open a thread about Indias debacle in upcoming series against Aus
akshayxyz Posted November 20, 2011 Posted November 20, 2011 That doesn't matter. Even if you're biggest fan of Dravid' date=' Sehwag or Mohammad Yousuf, [b']the moment you say something about SRT, you become SRTfanatic. You're fine as long as you bash him. this.
Guest BossBhai Posted November 20, 2011 Posted November 20, 2011 -- Removed on request of the user --
pensionplan Posted November 20, 2011 Posted November 20, 2011 pretty rich coming from someone who drools on Vivs FC hundreds manufactured against some pisspoor Counties and domestic sides. And ofcourse your legendary statement about Ernie Toshack being better than the likes of Wasim , Donald Shoaib etc.Hey atleast I do not throw kid tantrums on a forum and get all jumpy when someone has a contrary view and hurl abuses and threaten the mods to open more meaningless threads if they close the ones that are already in place. :-)
zen Posted November 20, 2011 Posted November 20, 2011 :omg: Ponting pawns the SRT fanatics big time This ( Srt fanatics getting pawned) has become a common sight :hysterical:
Guest BossBhai Posted November 20, 2011 Posted November 20, 2011 -- Removed on request of the user --
akshayxyz Posted November 20, 2011 Posted November 20, 2011 If grown ups begin to act like spoil brats like you I will do whatever it takes to fix such people. You speak nicely I will respond likewise you start the name calling and getting personal I will absolutely rape your online happiness. The choice is entirely in your hands. And don't try to act as though you are some very fair and balanced poster ... you run away with your tail firmly tucked between your legs in a debate based on facts ... you know that very well .. which is why you resort to these tried and tested tactics of trolling. Some really firm words. Someone really needed to say this. :two_thumbs_up:
Sachinism Posted November 20, 2011 Posted November 20, 2011 That doesn't matter. Even if you're biggest fan of Dravid, Sehwag or Mohammad Yousuf, the moment you say something about SRT, you become SRTfanatic. You're fine as long as you bash him. Let me explain. By labeling us fanatics; they try to paint us as delusioned folk, so our points made are easier to dismiss as its crazy folks talking. It hasn't worked, but oh well, they tried, like many who've tried in the past
Ultimate_Game Posted November 20, 2011 Posted November 20, 2011 I am sure Ponting is the greatest coz he averages higher runs/match :giggle: Who cares about averages when you can have higher runs per match :winky:
zen Posted November 20, 2011 Posted November 20, 2011 Now the usual procession (a srt fanatics tradition) of trying to console each other will continue ..... Along with their take how bad 'others' are (the view supported by other fanatic(s)) .... Indian soap opera where the happiness of millions depend upon a fraction change in avg :hehe:
Sachin=GOD Posted November 20, 2011 Posted November 20, 2011 How do you know? Not everyone has to beat the drum as hard like some of you here and get all testy when others opine that RD' date=' VVS etc are as good as SRT as batsmen. RD and VVS are as good as SRT and they have proved that.[/quote'] ok.
Trichromatic Posted November 23, 2011 Posted November 23, 2011 Now Tendulkar's average is above 50 Player Mat Inns NO Runs Ave RPT RPI DG Bradman (Aus) 52 80 10 6996 99.94 134.54 87.45 KC Sangakkara (SL) 103 173 12 9167 56.93 89.00 52.99 KF Barrington (Eng) 82 131 15 6806 58.67 83.00 51.95 WR Hammond (Eng) 85 140 16 7249 58.45 85.28 51.78 BC Lara (ICC/WI) 131 232 6 11953 52.88 91.24 51.52 L Hutton (Eng) 79 138 15 6971 56.67 88.24 50.51 GS Sobers (WI) 93 160 21 8032 57.78 86.37 50.20 V Sehwag (ICC/India) 92 158 6 7920 52.10 86.09 50.13 SR Tendulkar (India) 184 302 33 15106 56.12 82.10 50.02 Mohammad Yousuf (Pak) 90 156 12 7530 52.29 83.67 48.27 B-> :cantstop:
The Outsider Posted November 24, 2011 Posted November 24, 2011 If grown ups begin to act like spoil brats like you I will do whatever it takes to fix such people. You speak nicely I will respond likewise you start the name calling and getting personal I will absolutely rape your online happiness. The choice is entirely in your hands. And don't try to act as though you are some very fair and balanced poster ... you run away with your tail firmly tucked between your legs in a debate based on facts ... you know that very well .. which is why you resort to these tried and tested tactics of trolling. So, how many people's online happiness have you raped till date and do you list it on your CV? :hmmm:
zen Posted November 24, 2011 Posted November 24, 2011 Player Mat Inns NO Runs Ave RPT RPI DG Bradman (Aus) 52 80 10 6996 99.94 134.54 87.45 KC Sangakkara (SL) 103 173 12 9167 56.93 89.00 52.99 KF Barrington (Eng) 82 131 15 6806 58.67 83.00 51.95 WR Hammond (Eng) 85 140 16 7249 58.45 85.28 51.78 BC Lara (ICC/WI) 131 232 6 11953 52.88 91.24 51.52 L Hutton (Eng) 79 138 15 6971 56.67 88.24 50.51 GS Sobers (WI) 93 160 21 8032 57.78 86.37 50.20 V Sehwag (ICC/India) 92 158 6 7920 52.10 86.09 50.13 SR Tendulkar (India) 184 302 33 15106 56.12 82.10 50.02 Mohammad Yousuf (Pak) 90 156 12 7530 52.29 83.67 48.27 "Not outs" have had a big impact on avg of quite a few players .... Not outs hover around say 10% of the innings Someone like Lara has only 6 not outs of 232 innings .... now say his not out innings were also around 10%, then what would his avg be? =11953/209 = 57.19! PS if Sehwag too remained not out 10% of the time, his avg would be around 56! Ofc, you could have not out innings of 10, 50, 13 or 150, 200, etc so it affects the avg too but this is just taking it of the innings assuming a common trend
Sachinism Posted November 24, 2011 Posted November 24, 2011 "Not outs" have had a big impact on avg of quite a few players .... Not outs hover around say 10% of the innings Someone like Lara has only 6 not outs of 232 innings .... now say his not out innings were also around 10%, then what would his avg be? =11953/209 = 57.19! PS if Sehwag too remained not out 10% of the time, his avg would be around 56! Ofc, you could have not out innings of 10, 50, 13 or 150, 200, etc so it affects the avg too but this is just taking it of the innings assuming a common trend Yeh but the days Tendulkar remained not out, if he carried on batting he would have scored another 600 runs. So add that to each of his not out and we'll see what his average is then
Cricket_2_Death Posted November 24, 2011 Posted November 24, 2011 Yeh but the days Tendulkar remained not out' date=' if he carried on batting he would have scored another 600 runs. So add that to each of his not out and we'll see what his average is then[/quote'] If Sachin remained not out it is guaranteed through flawless guesstimates he would eventually choke and therefore would only manage 599 runs due to his midget-titis . This would therefore be far too little when it comes to runs per test so he pales in comparison to any other batsmen. Though don't take my word for it, my posts per thread is apparently not high enough to make a proper judgment. :((
Guest BossBhai Posted November 24, 2011 Posted November 24, 2011 -- Removed on request of the user --
zen Posted November 24, 2011 Posted November 24, 2011 Well not out helped the avg of quite a few batsmen, wonder why only SR fanatics are so worried :angel_smile: *acting inncocent like the Pak owned N2D*
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now