Guest BossBhai Posted November 24, 2011 Posted November 24, 2011 -- Removed on request of the user --
Ultimate_Game Posted November 24, 2011 Posted November 24, 2011 i dunno man i think we are at a CROSSROADS here. the disgruntled genereation of ppl that watch cricket for tendulkar and tendulkar alone, will redirect their lust elsewhere, possibly towards figures in other sports or other fields like engineering and marine biology. Trust me things will change. Cricket is bigger than any player in India. The next series after SRT retires people will be following it. The next world cup post SRT people will still be following India's fortunes in the tourney and celebrating India's success or mourning its failure. Remember T20 2007 without SRT, Ganguly, Dravid etc. and with a bunch of newbies and the whole country, nay Indians all over the world, went crazy. After Tendulkar there will be Kohli, Rahane, Rohit, Pujara or someone we haven't even heard of. Maybe we will unearth the next greatest fast bowler in Umesh and Aaron's footsteps and people will follow them. Tendulkar or no Tendulkar cricket's future is more than safe in India.
Ultimate_Game Posted November 24, 2011 Posted November 24, 2011 Tendulkar is Cricket Are you saying nobody followed cricket before SRT or nobody will do so post SRT?
rkt.india Posted November 24, 2011 Posted November 24, 2011 That is just a lame ***** cliche . Tell me why should anybody watch the dross that is on display by most players. So everybody other than SRT is dross. Were people before him watching dross? Bravo played better than SRT in this match, was that dross?
BeautifulGame Posted November 24, 2011 Posted November 24, 2011 Fans creates heroes.When Sachin retires i am there will be someone else who will occupy the stardom in his place.Just like Sachin become the hero of the nation after Gavaskar retires.
Guest BossBhai Posted November 24, 2011 Posted November 24, 2011 -- Removed on request of the user --
Ultimate_Game Posted November 24, 2011 Posted November 24, 2011 No ... Iam not saying that but for a lot of people cricket = Tendulkar. And there is plenty of good reason for that. It will be damn hard to find a substitute. Plus there is this thing called tontee-tontee that is fast changing the meaning of cricket As I mentioned there must be folks before Tendulkar who must have thought the same way about Gavaskar or Kapil or Vishwanath but life goes on. I can bet that the series after SRT retires will be business as usual for cricket fans.
vvvslaxman Posted November 24, 2011 Posted November 24, 2011 As I mentioned there must be folks before Tendulkar who must have thought the same way about Gavaskar or Kapil or Vishwanath but life goes on. I can bet that the series after SRT retires will be business as usual for cricket fans. Actually these days cricket is way too fast.. Far too many matches. Tendulkar misses lot of them too. People still watch. Cricket is cricket. If you have love for the game cricket you will watch.
rkt.india Posted November 24, 2011 Posted November 24, 2011 No ... Iam not saying that but for a lot of people cricket = Tendulkar. And there is plenty of good reason for that. It will be damn hard to find a substitute. Plus there is this thing called tontee-tontee that is fast changing the meaning of cricket But people still watch T20 whether there is SRT or not.
ganeshran Posted November 24, 2011 Posted November 24, 2011 People will watch who they want to watch. You cant force them to tailor their following to suit the sensibilities of a few cricket fans.
Ultimate_Game Posted November 24, 2011 Posted November 24, 2011 Actually these days cricket is way too fast.. Far too many matches. Tendulkar misses lot of them too. People still watch. Cricket is cricket. If you have love for the game cricket you will watch. Reinforces my point. If people didn't stop following cricket post Gavaskar why would they now? Time doesn't stop for anyone and life goes on - SRT or no SRT. We will always remember him and recall with pleasure what he meant to the team but at the same time we will continue following Team India.
pensionplan Posted November 24, 2011 Posted November 24, 2011 But people still watch T20 whether there is SRT or not.Trust me similar things were said when MJ retired from Basketball. But nothing has changed. People especially the new generation always connects with the present and will get on with it. No matter what the sport is no one individual be it Ruth, Bradman, Pele, Ali, MJ, Gretzky, SRT is above the game.
Guest BossBhai Posted November 24, 2011 Posted November 24, 2011 -- Removed on request of the user --
Ultimate_Game Posted November 24, 2011 Posted November 24, 2011 sorry I don't consider that as cricket. In the future (15-20 years from now) that very well may be the only format around.
rkt.india Posted November 24, 2011 Posted November 24, 2011 sorry I don't consider that as cricket. But it is not what you consider or not, what people watch, and even SRT plays it.
yoda Posted November 24, 2011 Posted November 24, 2011 actually it will be good when these so called fan(atics) stop watching cricket after tendulkar retires. they are an annoying bunch anyways.
pensionplan Posted November 24, 2011 Posted November 24, 2011 Actually I agree with BB that 20-20 is not really cricket(cannot believe a guy with Yusuf Pathan's cricket talent is a star there - kind of Arena league football to NFL analogy between real cricket(Test) to 20-20) but I watch it as I got on with it LOL.
Vijay.Sharma Posted November 24, 2011 Posted November 24, 2011 those who will stop watching cause one player retires aren't Indian cricket fans anyways' date=' so good riddance![/quote']why good riddance? It takes all sorts to make the world. There are a few people I know who have watched cricket from the 70s and still say they will not follow cricket closely once Buddha retires. Many people stopped following cricket closely once Gavva left but within a few years they found a reason to come back to cricket. These people are as knowledgeable as you and I when it comes to the game. They are no less a cricket fan than you or me. I think it is all bullshit that people say the game is not about individuals. What attracts every kid to a game is an individual. A game cannot survive without brilliant individuals. And when a brilliant individual leaves then you will find some people leave with him (only to come back when some other brilliant individual makes a mark). Sachin is a phenomenon that has never happened to India. I don't know if there is any other sportsman in the country ever to have captured the imagination of the nation and brought the nation together as much as Sachin has. People have grown up along side his career and relate very strongly with him. So obviously some people will stop watching cricket once he retires. It dunn mean they are any less of a cricket fan than you or me.
Guest BossBhai Posted November 24, 2011 Posted November 24, 2011 -- Removed on request of the user --
pensionplan Posted November 24, 2011 Posted November 24, 2011 I seriously doubt if anyone will stop watching a sport because a player retired - May be a dwindled interest for a while but a true fan will always come back. Basing it of course on my personal experiences.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now