Jump to content

17 member squad for Australia announced - ZAK selected, Harbhjan misses out.


Jersey #10

Recommended Posts

Posted

Good squad. I agree with the comments on Mukund but after he was dropped for the WI home Tests, there was very little chance of him returning to the squad for Australia. Anyway, Rahane is a serious talent and deserves his chances in Tests so not a bad selection even if unfair on Mukund. I'm not convinced Zak will be fit enough but would be happy to be proved wrong.

Posted

Mukund shouldn't be totally written off, he is a talent. Though with lack of experience, it would be very difficult to take him to Aus and all spots are pretty much secured by others anyway

Posted
Mukund shouldn't be totally written off, he is a talent. Though with lack of experience, it would be very difficult to take him to Aus and all spots are pretty much secured by others anyway
Mukund certainly looks India's future test opener.
Posted
Flat Aussie wickets are still better than our green wickets, MCG has been always sticky due to drop in pitches offering seam movement and we struggle most there brisbane has good pace and bounce perth same sydney the ball does swing but subcontinent like pitch adelaide-Flattest pitch of them all. we should get result in all venues except adelaide.
wasn't mcg low and slow when india played there last time
Posted

zak shud prove his fitness in 2 ranji matches ,as well as practice matches in australia,ideally first bowling line should be zak,ishant ,umesh and ashwin,zak for his guile and experience,ishant for pace and bounce,umesh for swing pace and reverse swing and ashwin for his spin and variations.

Posted

Mukund should have been there for the test team. Looks like this is a combined tests and ODI team? Glad that the pressure from guys like Ravi Shastri didn't make the selectors turn stupid and pick Harby.

Posted
Mukund should have been there for the test team. Looks like this is a combined tests and ODI team? Glad that the pressure from guys like Ravi Shastri didn't make the selectors turn stupid and pick Harby.
No. There's a certain Raina from CSK missing in that list.. :--D
Posted
Mukund shouldn't be totally written off, he is a talent. Though with lack of experience, it would be very difficult to take him to Aus and all spots are pretty much secured by others anyway
Don't buy the lack of experience thing, Rahane hasn't even made his Test debut yet. I don't mind his selection as he is a serious talent but Mukund harshly treated.
Posted
Mukund should have been there for the test team. Looks like this is a combined tests and ODI team? Glad that the pressure from guys like Ravi Shastri didn't make the selectors turn stupid and pick Harby.
Agree with you on the Bhajji Shastri bit, but Rahane is a much accomplished player than Mukund and should be playing in the Indian side for the last many years instead of clowns like Raina and Yuvraj.
Posted
Agree with you on the Bhajji Shastri bit' date=' but Rahane is a much accomplished player than Mukund and should be playing in the Indian side for the last many years instead of clowns like Raina and Yuvraj.[/quote'] Agreed that Rahane, and likes of Pujara and Rohit, should have been ahead of Raina & Yuvraj in Tests but you have to pick a specialist opener as the 3rd opener. The selectors are making the same mistake they made when they tried to make Laxman open in 90s - that move nearly stalled Laxman's career and these moves generally never succeed. Other than Sehwag making successful transition as an opener, I haven't seen any other middle order batsman succeed as an opener.
Posted
But he is a better batsman than Saha and on bouncy pitches in Aus I back him to score more than Saha.
+1 guess the only advantage of having saha is he is a huge midget :p any bouncers the aussies bowlers bowl to him will be called as wides :giggle:
Posted
What makes you think Rahane is not a specialist opener?
At least I was under the impression Rahane is a top order batsman who generally bats at 3. I remember reading somewhere when Mukund was selected as an opener on the tour to WI that Rahane was a no. 3 bat so wasn't considered for the opening slot. But if Rahane's a specialist batsman and has scored most of his FC runs as an opener then he deserves the spot ahead of Mukund no doubt.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...