Serani Posted December 5, 2011 Posted December 5, 2011 Well will the racists in charge ban Kohli for swearing at the umpire? If that was a white player he would be banned straight away!
BERGKAMP Posted December 5, 2011 Posted December 5, 2011 no, stuart broad curses and effs and blinds a lot more in every match he plays and nothing ever happens to him.
1983-2011 Posted December 5, 2011 Posted December 5, 2011 Well will the racists in charge ban Kohli for swearing at the umpire? If that was a white player he would be banned straight away! how was kohli racist and name me one white player that got banned for dissent, can't remember barbie ever getting fined or banned for dissent. his swears were: mad@rchod - mother fuc**r bhench0d - sister fuc**r
Number Posted December 5, 2011 Posted December 5, 2011 he will get 5.5% of match fees deducted.In case of Bresnan it was 7.5 , yes they are racists.
saneindian Posted December 5, 2011 Posted December 5, 2011 Doesn't look good at all, will surely cop a heavy fine. Perhaps also shows the frustration younger players have with BCCI's opposition to DRS.
achilles Posted December 5, 2011 Posted December 5, 2011 Serani ofcourse doesn't answer tough questions but- Why is Stuart Broad not fined for showing dissent to the umpire?
Trichromatic Posted December 5, 2011 Posted December 5, 2011 He should be fined. It was idiotic to swear after the decision. If players can't accept umpire's decision then they should request their board to implement drs or keep their mouth shut and walk away decently.
BERGKAMP Posted December 5, 2011 Posted December 5, 2011 Serani ofcourse doesn't answer tough questions but- Why is Stuart Broad not fined for showing dissent to the umpire? bekoz daddy is best phrendz with all the other match refrees.
Desi Cartman Posted December 5, 2011 Posted December 5, 2011 He should be fined. It was idiotic to swear after the decision. If players can't accept umpire's decision then they should request their board to implement drs or keep their mouth shut and walk away decently. 100% agree
achilles Posted December 5, 2011 Posted December 5, 2011 He should be fined. It was idiotic to swear after the decision. If players can't accept umpire's decision then they should request their board to implement drs or keep their mouth shut and walk away decently. Would've been verr phunny if it was Dhoni getting a bad decision :winky: bekoz daddy is best phrendz with all the other match refrees. Yeah totally.
achilles Posted December 5, 2011 Posted December 5, 2011 Yeah, lets ban Virat Kohli for this- Video link :clap:
Trichromatic Posted December 5, 2011 Posted December 5, 2011 Totally deserving of a ban. :WTF: Who gets banned for such offence? Asking for higher punishment just because he is an Indian?
Sachinism Posted December 5, 2011 Posted December 5, 2011 Serani that is some poor trolling. Standards have fallen :headshake:
Number Posted December 5, 2011 Posted December 5, 2011 Totally deserving of a ban. You deserve it more than Kohli.
J P K Posted December 5, 2011 Posted December 5, 2011 banning kohli for swearing is like banning serani for trolling
jonas10 Posted December 5, 2011 Posted December 5, 2011 Well will the racists in charge ban Kohli for swearing at the umpire? If that was a white player he would be banned straight away! Oh shut up you tool. For 100 years the white people ran ICC and now they cant take it that the shoe is on the other foot. Bresnen behaved like an animal and deserved what he got. Unless the umpire understands hindi we cant rely on lip reading now can we.
BeautifulGame Posted December 5, 2011 Posted December 5, 2011 If ICC was impartial Stuart Board would have been banned from cricket long ago
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now