Jump to content

Tendulkar 200* Vs Sehwag 219


1983-2011

Tendulkar 200* Vs Sehwag 219  

  1. 1.



Recommended Posts

That is some extrapolation!!! You are giving that Kapil Dev 175 too much credit here. Its not one of those vital moments of Indian cricketing history as you make it out to be. Cricket would still be lucrative as there just is too much money involved in it now.
because of cricket crazy indian public which may not have been w/o 83 win.
Link to comment
Awesome! :clap: But there is an error here :hmmm: Sehwag doesn't qualify to be a 'human'. He is at a different level. (Humans have fear, he has no fear). Please correct pome and rewrite. :protest:
:nono: Actually he is the first human to do it "Pehla Insaan" coz the one before him is The GOD :hail:
Link to comment
Arey' date=' they beat Australia in the next match :wall:[/quote'] yeah,it was a knock out game from Indian POV.they had to win both IIRC.if we lost against Zim,Aus game was meaningless havent watched that.just read the reports.so I may be wrong
Link to comment
Tch tch. You are not getting my point at all. Sachin is not defiinitely human, but neither is Sehwag. You cannot demean Sehwag by calling him a human :nono:
No, in my book there can only be one GOD of Cricket and that seat currently belongs to Sachin :proud:. And before being a GOD, even Sachin was a human, so Sehwag shouldn't mind it :--D.
Link to comment
yeah,it was a knock out game from Indian POV.they had to win both IIRC.if we lost against Zim,Aus game was meaningless havent watched that.just read the reports.so I may be wrong
Factcheck time: When India met Zim, India were on 8 points with 2 victories AND Australia were also on 8 points with 2 victories. India beat Zim and Aus and ended up with 16 points. So, had India lost, they would have had to meet Aus where both of them were at 8. That would have been a virtual knock-out. After India won, they met Aus with already 12 points in the kitty. Aussies lost and were stuck on 8 points. So, the Aus match was the crucial one anyway, and not the Zim match.
Link to comment
Factcheck time: When India met Zim, India were on 8 points with 2 victories AND Australia were also on 8 points with 2 victories. India beat Zim and Aus and ended up with 16 points. So, had India lost, they would have had to meet Aus where both of them were at 8. That would have been a virtual knock-out. After India won, they met Aus with already 12 points in the kitty. Aussies lost and were stuck on 8 points. So, the Aus match was the crucial one anyway, and not the Zim match.
if ind had lost even zim would have 8 points. and they had one match left with west indies (and they had defeated aus which was a better team than indies at that time so there was a possibility of zim beating indies). so if ind had lost to zim and aus then indies and aus would have gone through. if ind had lost to zim and won against oz and zim had lost against indies it would be 3 way tie between zim aus and indies.
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...