Lord Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 Padosis won a world cup with bowling. what do u say to that? Inzi was a boiler???? Link to comment
bulbul Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 Padosis won a world cup with bowling. what do u say to that? plz post this in Padosi website...you will loved whole night Link to comment
mishra Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 Rubbish! SRT' date=' and not SRK is God! Hugh Jackman is a moron.[/quote'] Do you even know how dedicated SRK brigade is on ICF.... :girl_haha: Link to comment
mishra Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 Inzi was a boiler???? batyy boy... Baby batty boy Link to comment
mishra Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 plz post this in Padosi website...you will loved whole night why would I? Badatameezee ki had hotee hai... Kaane ko ,munh par kaanaa nahi bolate..... Link to comment
deathmonger Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 That is some extrapolation!!! You are giving that Kapil Dev 175 too much credit here. Its not one of those vital moments of Indian cricketing history as you make it out to be. Cricket would still be lucrative as there just is too much money involved in it now. because of cricket crazy indian public which may not have been w/o 83 win. Link to comment
Magneto Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 Do you even know how dedicated SRK brigade is on ICF.... :girl_haha: I will take them on singlehandedly :angry_smile: Link to comment
Magneto Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 because of cricket crazy indian public which may not have been w/o 83 win. That was not a knock-out match :hehe: Link to comment
Sid Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 Sehwag's 219, just too good. Link to comment
deathmonger Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 That was not a knock-out match :hehe: was imp still. may not have gone to semi final otherwise. Link to comment
gaurav92 Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 Awesome! :clap: But there is an error here :hmmm: Sehwag doesn't qualify to be a 'human'. He is at a different level. (Humans have fear, he has no fear). Please correct pome and rewrite. :protest: Actually he is the first human to do it "Pehla Insaan" coz the one before him is The GOD Link to comment
zen Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 look how low we are stooping now :haha: that's goes with being a fanatic :hysterical: Link to comment
Magneto Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 was imp still. may not have gone to semi final otherwise. Arey, they beat Australia in the next match :wall: Link to comment
Magneto Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 Actually he is the first human to do it "Pehla Insaan" coz the one before him is The GOD Tch tch. You are not getting my point at all. Sachin is not defiinitely human, but neither is Sehwag. You cannot demean Sehwag by calling him a human Link to comment
Lord Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 Arey' date=' they beat Australia in the next match :wall:[/quote'] yeah,it was a knock out game from Indian POV.they had to win both IIRC.if we lost against Zim,Aus game was meaningless havent watched that.just read the reports.so I may be wrong Link to comment
gaurav92 Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 Tch tch. You are not getting my point at all. Sachin is not defiinitely human, but neither is Sehwag. You cannot demean Sehwag by calling him a human No, in my book there can only be one GOD of Cricket and that seat currently belongs to Sachin :proud:. And before being a GOD, even Sachin was a human, so Sehwag shouldn't mind it :--D. Link to comment
Magneto Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 yeah,it was a knock out game from Indian POV.they had to win both IIRC.if we lost against Zim,Aus game was meaningless havent watched that.just read the reports.so I may be wrong Factcheck time: When India met Zim, India were on 8 points with 2 victories AND Australia were also on 8 points with 2 victories. India beat Zim and Aus and ended up with 16 points. So, had India lost, they would have had to meet Aus where both of them were at 8. That would have been a virtual knock-out. After India won, they met Aus with already 12 points in the kitty. Aussies lost and were stuck on 8 points. So, the Aus match was the crucial one anyway, and not the Zim match. Link to comment
Magneto Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 No, in my book there can only be one GOD of Cricket and that seat currently belongs to Sachin :proud:. And before being a GOD, even Sachin was a human, so Sehwag shouldn't mind it :--D. Sehwag is not a god. He is either an android or an alien. :hmmm: Link to comment
deathmonger Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 Factcheck time: When India met Zim, India were on 8 points with 2 victories AND Australia were also on 8 points with 2 victories. India beat Zim and Aus and ended up with 16 points. So, had India lost, they would have had to meet Aus where both of them were at 8. That would have been a virtual knock-out. After India won, they met Aus with already 12 points in the kitty. Aussies lost and were stuck on 8 points. So, the Aus match was the crucial one anyway, and not the Zim match. if ind had lost even zim would have 8 points. and they had one match left with west indies (and they had defeated aus which was a better team than indies at that time so there was a possibility of zim beating indies). so if ind had lost to zim and aus then indies and aus would have gone through. if ind had lost to zim and won against oz and zim had lost against indies it would be 3 way tie between zim aus and indies. Link to comment
Sachinism Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 People arguing that '83 was vital because it changed the future of Indian cricket. Tendulkar is THAT if not more important. Nearly all young batsmen grow up idolising him. Without Sachin we don't have Sehwag Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now