Tendulkar 200* Vs Sehwag 219

[zen]

There's no mention of bowling attacks at all' date=' why am I not surprised? :giggle:[/quote'] lol .... When a team scores 400+ on such pitches, you want to talk abt bowling attacks! .... From what I recall, that Ind vs SA was a high scoring series with bowlers from both sides struggling based on bowling attacks on paper, are we going to imply that Dhoni 70 odd > Sehwag 219 and since Sachin scored more than Dhoni, Sachins 200 > Sehwag 219 :giggle:

[SachDan]

Since you asked. The attack VS faced is much better. If this was someone else I would have ignored. See anything to keep you happy.

ok

[zen]

abey chaman.. it is not about your opinion.but it is about your logic... needed help and all.. Even I would pick 219 for entertainment value, and 200* for quality of opposition and special value for first ever (no precedence)...but your logic is as ridiculous as ever...not that I am surprised, but good to see that you are consistent. "RPT samajhne kee auqat" :hysterical: :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: something like this can come out of your hole only :D

Look who is talking abt logic :hysterical:

[deathmonger]

Lol no

sorry got misguided due to cartman.

[Old guy]

sachin...was better to look at too some amazing shots and south africa is much much better fielding side so u even if u dont count bowling its better

[SachDan]

lol .... When a team scores 400+ on such pitches' date= you want to talk abt bowling attacks! .... From what I recall, that Ind vs SA was a high scoring series with bowlers from both sides struggling based on bowling attacks on paper, are we going to imply that Dhoni 70 odd > Sehwag 219 and since Sachin scored more than Dhoni, Sachins 200 > Sehwag 219 :giggle:

Oh dear! So in high scoring matches, bowling line-ups doesn't matter at all? your cricketing gyan is beyond beyond anyone's imagination :hatsoff:

[CSK Fan]

lol .... When a team scores 400+ on such pitches, you want to talk abt bowling attacks! .... From what I recall, that Ind vs SA was a high scoring series with bowlers from both sides struggling based on bowling attacks on paper, are we going to imply that Dhoni 70 odd > Sehwag 219 and since Sachin scored more than Dhoni, Sachins 200 > Sehwag 219 :giggle:

So steyn and Morkel are not good bowlers even on flat pitches?

[gaurav92]

Anwar's simply because it came against better opponents :--D

[pensionplan]

ok

Yes. And one more for you. Since you asked about bowling attacks which knock among tons of runs Tendulkar scored compares to the 96 by VVS at Durban when none of the other players from both sides even crossed 50 and the team won. You guys do not have to make it so obvious. I know you are in a state of mourning trying your best to undermine VS's record breaking knock but still.

[akshayxyz]

Look who is talking abt logic :hysterical:

as usual, a top quality response.... stay happy in your dream world.. there is not place for your kind of logic in real world, except of course, to use as examples of absurdity. btw - since you are insisting at using "Ad-Hominem"..- what do you know about me :hmmm:.. I for sure know a lot about you, before you even posted your cropped picture.

[Vijay.Sharma]

There was no need for this comparison thread

This

[Sachin=GOD]

Yes. And one more for you. Since you asked about bowling attacks which knock among tons of runs Tendulkar scored compares to the 96 by VVS at Durban when none of the other players from both sides even crossed 50 and the team won. You guys do not have to make it so obvious. I know you are in a state of mourning trying your best to undermine VS's record breaking knock but still.

bringing Test matches in a thread about runs made in ODIs :hatsoff:

[akshayxyz]

Yes. And one more for you. Since you asked about bowling attacks which knock among tons of runs Tendulkar scored compares to the 96 by VVS at Durban when none of the other players from both sides even crossed 50 and the team won. You guys do not have to make it so obvious. I know you are in a state of mourning trying your best to undermine VS's record breaking knock but still.

Looks like your hormones are beaching the limit your brain can handle (see below).. let it settle, you can practice typing later, perhaps it might make more sense then, relatively.

bringing Test matches in a thread about runs made in ODIs :hatsoff:

[mishra]

Pakis don't get to play on flat tracks' date=' it's wonly Indias plus we always win the toss and bat first, never allow foreigners bat first when its flat[/quote'] Desi paaji... how can they play on flat pitch if Amerikans keeps sending their drones....

[Desi Cartman]

Desi paaji... how can they play on flat pitch if Amerikans keeps sending their drones....

:protest: it's not about why they can't achieve anything it's always about why Indians achieved something

[yoda]

The Sachin 200* was magical, too bad I didn't get to watch this one.

[Asim]

Sachin inng was a Class... Sehwag inng is a Blast...

[Asim]

& I watched both LIVE

[mishra]

:protest: it's not about why they can't achieve anything it's always about why Indians achieved something

:hysterical: There is a icf band which has planned a protest march if Sachin gets any more hundred

[zen]

Oh dear! So in high scoring matches' date=' bowling line-ups doesn't matter at all? your cricketing gyan is beyond beyond anyone's imagination :hatsoff:[/quote'] nice intrepretation guys! :giggle: When teams are scoring closed to 300 runs in most games of a series, the bowling attacks are struggling in those conditions .... which is why there is no point in talking about bowling attacks This (discussing based on bowling attacks) would be like two film-makers discussing a copied script on which both are basing their film on film-maker one: In my film, the hero takes his mom to airport in a taxi film maker 2: In my film, the hero takes his mom to airport in a rickshow a big difference, I must say!