Boundary is only 50 yards ??

[panther]

so the boundaries were 60 meters

[ganeshran]

what can i say been called a paki for posting something deemed controversial :cantstop:

Best is to report any posts with personal attacks.

[G_B_]

Will meet you guys in any of the g2gs in London. CF is doing fine..Although I spend most of my time here...

dude you should have said. Me KOP bangbang RSD and SD met up at Baker street. Would have loved to meet you. Basically we just meet eat someplace and chat. We will probably have another g2g in the summer time.

[nballa]

the shortest part of the boundary was 52 meters and longest 70 meters just go to wikimapea and use the 'distance measure' tool. so assuming the boundary was short, a four is worth 3 runs lets say and a six is worth 5 runs(deducting a run per shorter boundaries per duckburth stewie method) his actual score is 219 - (25+7) = 187 runs. so yeah he comfortably falls short of a double hundred

[G_B_]

Best is to report any posts with personal attacks.

me axtrix etc come from TMS much bigger cess pit :--D dont worry about it.

[Ultimate_Game]

the shortest part of the boundary was 52 meters and longest 70 meters just go to wikimapea and use the 'distance measure' tool. so assuming the boundary was short' date=' a four is worth 3 runs lets say and a six is worth 5 runs(deducting a run per shorter boundaries per duckburth stewie method) his actual score is 219 - (25+7) = 187 runs. so yeah he comfortably falls short of a double hundred[/quote'] This logic is comparable to RPT :facepalm:

[panther]

the shortest part of the boundary was 52 meters and longest 70 meters just go to wikimapea and use the 'distance measure' tool. so assuming the boundary was short' date=' a four is worth 3 runs lets say and a six is worth 5 runs(deducting a run per shorter boundaries per duckburth stewie method) his actual score is 219 - (25+7) = 187 runs. so yeah he comfortably falls short of a double hundred[/quote']

[G_B_]

Well it is 70 yards http://www.bcci.tv/bcci/bccitv/community/venues/venue/4eb78abb398ea

which works out to about 63.7 meters

[Stuge]

another reason why 200 > 219

another reason your post suck :giggle:

[Utalk]

I don't see how small boundary has helped him scoring 219. He hit 25 fours. Small playing fielding means it's hard to hit 4s because angles are cut and it's harder to pierce the field then say a 80 yard boundary. If he had hit say 15 sixes then one could say he took advantage of small boundaries.

[ch1234]

another reason why 200 > 219

Sachin's was also on a very small ground..

[deathmonger]

the shortest part of the boundary was 52 meters and longest 70 meters just go to wikimapea and use the 'distance measure' tool. so assuming the boundary was short' date=' a four is worth 3 runs lets say and a six is worth 5 runs(deducting a run per shorter boundaries per duckburth stewie method) his actual score is 219 - (25+7) = 187 runs. so yeah he comfortably falls short of a double hundred[/quote'] anwar scored century with runner. take out runner runs. yeah he comfortably falls short of a century.

[gult]

I don't see how small boundary has helped him scoring 219. He hit 25 fours. Small playing fielding means it's hard to hit 4s because angles are cut and it's harder to pierce the field then say a 80 yard boundary. If he had hit say 15 sixes then one could say he took advantage of small boundaries.

Very good and informative post :two_thumbs_up:

[Karan114]

Or The boundaries are really very small . Maybe even flouting ICC laws.

That's what we do, amiret...we're cheats but we control the ICC so we get away with it. Maybe you guys should take a delegation led by your noble talisman Shahid Afridi to expose our typically Indian cheating?

[carnish]

I don't see how small boundary has helped him scoring 219. He hit 25 fours. Small playing fielding means it's hard to hit 4s because angles are cut and it's harder to pierce the field then say a 80 yard boundary. If he had hit say 15 sixes then one could say he took advantage of small boundaries.

Exactly :nice:

[carnish]

the shortest part of the boundary was 52 meters and longest 70 meters just go to wikimapea and use the 'distance measure' tool. so assuming the boundary was short' date=' a four is worth 3 runs lets say and a six is worth 5 runs(deducting a run per shorter boundaries per duckburth stewie method) his actual score is 219 - (25+7) = 187 runs. so yeah he comfortably falls short of a double hundred[/quote'] :WTF:

[Magneto]

I don't see how small boundary has helped him scoring 219. He hit 25 fours. Small playing fielding means it's hard to hit 4s because angles are cut and it's harder to pierce the field then say a 80 yard boundary. If he had hit say 15 sixes then one could say he took advantage of small boundaries.

It helped because had it been a large ground the WI fielders would have RUN and RUN and RUN and eventually collected the ball before it reached the rope. But here they had no chance of doing all the running. The moment the ball whisked past them, it reached the boundary! Badi na-insaafi hai! :diablo:

[Lord]

:WTF:

++:WTF:

[Stuge]

what kind of utter nonsense is being posted by our guest nballa hahhaha

[Number]

nballa does nothing wrong technically. I think the smartest troll here ..