Karan114 Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 http://www.espncricinfo.com/review2011/content/story/547545.html No 1 test batsmen not in the squad , because they wanted to put indian player into it they put rahul dravid Lol , what a fkin loosers . Averaged 30 in England, 27 in South Africa but plundered 500 runs on the roads of UAE. Typical flat track bullying of the type your nation's cricketers are infamous for. Don't even dare compare him to Rahul Dravid who took three hundreds off England's superb attack in English conditions. Your **** team has won two Tests in two years so why are you expecting your players to be in a world Test XI anyway? This isn't the SSC or Galle we are talking about where your team occasionally wins on doctored pitches.
Sachinism Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 Averaged 30 in England, 27 in South Africa but plundered 500 runs on the roads of UAE. Typical flat track bullying of the type your nation's cricketers are infamous for. Don't even dare compare him to Rahul Dravid who took three hundreds off England's superb attack in English conditions. Your **** team has won two Tests in two years so why are you expecting your players to be in a world Test XI anyway? This isn't the SSC or Galle we are talking about where your team occasionally wins on doctored pitches. Ouch. Hard-hitting but true
Pak_Fan_4_Eva Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 post u r list Sangakarra in place of Bravo. Bravo is solely in the team based on his similarities with Lara. I can't believe they used this analogy to draft him in the XI
deathmonger Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 Sangakarra in place of Bravo. Bravo is solely in the team based on his similarities with Lara. I can't believe they used this analogy to draft him in the XI bravo made centuries against the 2nd best team in the world (us) while Sanga did minnow bashing (you guys).
bulbul Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 Sangakarra in place of Bravo. Bravo is solely in the team based on his similarities with Lara. I can't believe they used this analogy to draft him in the XI i thought u have wholesale changes...all u come up with one change for which our fellow ICFrs already gave enough reason :winky:
Equinox Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 Shakib Al Hasan averaged more than Bravo and also had 21 wickets @ 28.61.
Pak_Fan_4_Eva Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 i thought u have wholesale changes...all u come up with one change for which our fellow ICFrs already gave enough reason :winky: I thought and thought and thought of it. And I reached the conclusion that 2011 was a really poor year for openers. Hafeez was no way good enough to be considered the best opener, not yet anyway. Pietersen as well. Flawed selection for the Test XI
bulbul Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 I thought and thought and thought of it. And I reached the conclusion that 2011 was a really poor year for openers. Hafeez was no way good enough to be considered the best opener, not yet anyway. Pietersen as well. Flawed selection for the Test XI they considered him as all rounder..
Manny_Pacquiao Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 LMAO @ the inclusion of pakis in the test team. love how hafeez was introduced...During the team's unbeaten run against Zimbabwe, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh :hysterical: ajmal shouldnt be there either. and afridi in the ODI xi? seriously?? i think 1/3rd of those wickets were from 5 wicket hauls against the mighty canada, kenya, bangladesh. they include a piece of **** like afridi but leave out a stud batsman like gambhir. nice. clearly these selections were made to appease the cousin loving crowd.
Clarke Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 The guy who compiled the list must not watch cricket and used statsguru or something, how on earth could anyone justify Hafeez (particularly as an opener) in the test XI ? Don't give me the all rounder crap.
singhprakash72 Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 How serious do u guys take cricinfo? Anyway if u r talking about skills Dravid and Sanga are on same scale but yes till this SA victory there is very little Sanga has done for SL overseas wins. Believe me my SL friend you would rather have team SL come 1st in ranking than subcontinental craze for individual performance over team.
Rajiv Posted January 2, 2012 Posted January 2, 2012 That's a pretty crap list. CricIndfo can do better than that It's 2012, about time when majority of Pakistanis remove this notion of cricindia, Indian agents, israel-us-ind nexus. It's really going nowhere and everyone starts to repeat the tale, the rumor starts to look like truth and that is really bad
Pagalpanti Posted January 2, 2012 Posted January 2, 2012 The list isn't just based on stats. Anyway Prior had better year than Sanga.
thongale Posted January 2, 2012 Posted January 2, 2012 Averaged 30 in England, 27 in South Africa but plundered 500 runs on the roads of UAE. Typical flat track bullying of the type your nation's cricketers are infamous for. Don't even dare compare him to Rahul Dravid who took three hundreds off England's superb attack in English conditions. Your **** team has won two Tests in two years so why are you expecting your players to be in a world Test XI anyway? This isn't the SSC or Galle we are talking about where your team occasionally wins on doctored pitches.How much Sachin averaged in last England series? :finger:
ganeshran Posted January 2, 2012 Posted January 2, 2012 How much Sachin averaged in last England series? :finger: He is not in the Test XI. Your point is?
BestVRest Posted January 2, 2012 Posted January 2, 2012 Cricinfo is no longer unbiased it's good to see they came up with proper test squad, Dravid should have been in the team but he is the only one really.
amiret Posted January 2, 2012 Posted January 2, 2012 The TEST 11 team has been selected solely on the performances of 2011. Everybody knows sachin is as good a player as Alistair Cook .
gult Posted January 2, 2012 Posted January 2, 2012 @thongale.. did you even go through the list or you're just on an agenda?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now