Rajiv Posted January 3, 2012 Posted January 3, 2012 It was sheer bad luck, inside edge..he was also losing partners. Tendulkar was looking so good, he could have given batting lessons to the rest
SachDan Posted January 3, 2012 Posted January 3, 2012 Well' date=' I agree with him. I myself havent yet uttered a syllalbe in anger against Dravid.[/quote'] Getting bowled out three times in a row ( one of them was a no-ball though)..isn't that a first for Dravid? in the 1st innings at MCG he was out to a good ball but time and again he seemed too late on ball including today's painstaking five runs.
Ram Posted January 3, 2012 Posted January 3, 2012 Getting bowled out three times in a row ( one of them was a no-ball though)..isn't that a first for Dravid? in the 1st innings at MCG he was out to a good ball but time and again he seemed too late on ball including today's painstaking five runs. At least Dravid does not go on a freewheeling fishing camp outside off-stump like some of our other batsmen. At this point, he's probably the only batsman who is willing to look ugly out there on the pitch. Edit; Let me also add that I felt Shwetabh's characterization of Sachin as a 'walking wicket against Broad and Siddle' was uncalled for and inaccurate.
Ultimate_Game Posted January 3, 2012 Posted January 3, 2012 when was last time sehwag scored hundred....he is playing loose cricket. we all know he can be devasting' date=' all he has to do is play percentage cricket..atleast give one hour to bowlers...[/quote'] And when was the last time we scored 400+ away :winky:
satishg Posted January 3, 2012 Posted January 3, 2012 At least Dravid does not go on a freewheeling fishing camp outside off-stump like some of our other batsmen. At this point, he's probably the only batsman who is willing to look ugly out there on the pitch. But dont you think that for a man who has scored 5 centuries last year he looks so shaky, the gap between his bat and pad is huge and he bats similar to Michael Clarke. Even yesterday he got an inside edge to a ball that came in, once yes i can accept that he got a good one but 4 times he has got out in a similar fashion. And these idiot commentators keep calling him the Wall when he is no where close to his best, his defense is so shaky its like watching Dravid of the 99 series against Oz. Dont know what changed in 5 months but he definitely is a big liability right now!
Ultimate_Game Posted January 3, 2012 Posted January 3, 2012 It was sheer bad luck' date=' inside edge..he was also losing partners. Tendulkar was looking so good, he could have given batting lessons to the rest[/quote'] He has been getting these "oh so beautiful" 30s and 40s since the Eng tour but hasn't made a significant score yet.
Ram Posted January 3, 2012 Posted January 3, 2012 But dont you think that for a man who has scored 5 centuries last year he looks so shaky' date=' the gap between his bat and pad is huge and he bats similar to Michael Clarke. Even yesterday he got an inside edge to a ball that came in, once yes i can accept that he got a good one but 4 times he has got out in a similar fashion. And these idiot commentators keep calling him the Wall when he is no where close to his best, his defense is so shaky its like watching Dravid of the 99 series against Oz. Dont know what changed in 5 months but he definitely is a big liability right now![/quote'] You guys are unbelievable, seriously. Here's a guy who just had his 2nd best year of his 16 year old international career at the age of 38, played some sterling innings in some really tough conditions in England and West Indies and all it took is just 3 dismissals for the knives to come out? And lets be fair - unlike some of the other batters, some of the deliveries that have dismissed him have been absolute peaches (for eff's sake, the Hilfenhaus delivery that got him the 1st over the 3rd morning was a beauty - swung from outside off-stump, pitched on middle, straightened to hit the top of off...not many would have survived that..) Yes, it is rather surprising that his defense has been breached 3 times (4 if you count the near miss inside edge yesterday), but surely, people are allowed at least a week of poor form are they not, especially after a year of stellar performances?
Pagalpanti Posted January 3, 2012 Posted January 3, 2012 I have a strong feeling....we'll make a comeback tomorrow.. bowl out aussies for 210-220 and then rack up 350-400 in 3rd innings and then decimate Aussies. :two_thumbs_up: :om:
satishg Posted January 3, 2012 Posted January 3, 2012 You guys are unbelievable, seriously. Here's a guy who just had his 2nd best year of his 16 year old international career at the age of 38, played some sterling innings in some really tough conditions in England and West Indies and all it took is just 3 dismissals for the knives to come out? And lets be fair - unlike some of the other batters, some of the deliveries that have dismissed him have been absolute peaches (for eff's sake, the Hilfenhaus delivery that got him the 1st over the 3rd morning was a beauty - swung from outside off-stump, pitched on middle, straightened to hit the top of off...not many would have survived that..) Yes, it is rather surprising that his defense has been breached 3 times (4 if you count the near miss inside edge yesterday), but surely, people are allowed at least a week of poor form are they not, especially after a year of stellar performances? I am not asking for his head, all i am saying is he looks so damn shaky for a guy who has just had the 2nd best year in his entire career. When he is at the crease you always get a feeling that he is going to get out any moment, even in his 68 he was very scratchy. Just like how you said SRT would be measured by a higher standard i am doing the same thing for Rahul Dravid since you know he has the stuff to combat this kind of bowling. I am just clueless as to why he keeps getting out in the same fashion knowing how serious he is about his batting and his technique.
jhakati Posted January 3, 2012 Posted January 3, 2012 I have a strong feeling....we'll make a comeback tomorrow.. bowl out aussies for 210-220 and then rack up 350-400 in 3rd innings and then decimate Aussies. :two_thumbs_up: :om: we'll score 350-400? :hysterical:
Ultimate_Game Posted January 3, 2012 Posted January 3, 2012 I have a strong feeling....we'll make a comeback tomorrow.. bowl out aussies for 210-220 and then rack up 350-400 in 3rd innings and then decimate Aussies. :two_thumbs_up: :om: I say Aus scores close to 400 and India fold once again leaving a small target for Aus to chase and Aussies win by 8 wkts.
Ram Posted January 3, 2012 Posted January 3, 2012 I am not asking for his head' date=' all i am saying is he looks so damn shaky for a guy who has just had the 2nd best year in his entire career. When he is at the crease you always get a feeling that he is going to get out any moment, even in his 68 he was very scratchy. Just like how you said SRT would be measured by a higher standard i am doing the same thing for Rahul Dravid since you know he has the stuff to combat this kind of bowling. I am just clueless as to why he keeps getting out in the same fashion knowing how serious he is about his batting and his technique.[/quote'] Fair enough. If all you're saying is that the pattern in Dravid's dismissals has you worried, I share the sentiment with you. Apologies for misinterpreting you earlier.
Pagalpanti Posted January 3, 2012 Posted January 3, 2012 I say Aus scores close to 400 and India fold once again leaving a small target for Aus to chase and Aussies win by 8 wkts. Chance of storm tomorrow, so might be overcast so good chance for our bowlers to get quick wickets. If we do bowl them out for under 250. I don't see our batting fail for 4th time in a row.
satishg Posted January 3, 2012 Posted January 3, 2012 Fair enough. If all you're saying is that the pattern in Dravid's dismissals has you worried' date=' I share the sentiment with you. Apologies for misinterpreting you earlier.[/quote'] No worries, i would love to see Rahul score like how he did in England but these Aussie bowlers seems to have got his measure. James Pattinson is having an extended honeymoon, i dont think even Brett Lee worried us this much during his debut series against us in 99. And to make matters worse the avg Siddle is now looking like Allan Donald :((
Manny_Pacquiao Posted January 3, 2012 Posted January 3, 2012 No worries' date=' i would love to see Rahul score like how he did in England but these Aussie bowlers seems to have got his measure. James Pattinson is having an extended honeymoon, i dont think even Brett Lee worried us this much during his debut series against us in 99. And to make matters worse the avg Siddle is now looking like Allan Donald :(([/quote'] doesnt take much to get 'THE WALL''s measure these days. just ask marlon samuels. :giggle:
goose Posted January 3, 2012 Posted January 3, 2012 Once again i think everyone is focusing too much on the batting. Of course the media is having a field day with our galacticos failing but it's the weak link in our bowling attack that is letting us down.
Ultimate_Game Posted January 3, 2012 Posted January 3, 2012 Chance of storm tomorrow' date=' so might be overcast so good chance for our bowlers to get quick wickets. If we do bowl them out for under 250. [b']I don't see our batting fail for 4th time in a row. Why not? We have already seen them pass 300 just once in their last 18 away innings. Another 200 something score wouldn't really be termed as surprising at this point.
Ultimate_Game Posted January 3, 2012 Posted January 3, 2012 Once again i think everyone is focusing too much on the batting. Of course the media is having a field day with our galacticos failing but it's the weak link in our bowling attack that is letting us down. How can you say that? We managed to get Aussies cheaply last Test and may well do so this test as well. But it won't help if the batsmen don't show up. After some point bowlers' morale will take a hit and they can't keep on bowling throughout the test with just a 60 odd overs break thrown in when our superstars go out and score 200.
Sachin=GOD Posted January 3, 2012 Posted January 3, 2012 Getting bowled out three times in a row ( one of them was a no-ball though)..isn't that a first for Dravid? in the 1st innings at MCG he was out to a good ball but time and again he seemed too late on ball including today's painstaking five runs. I think you're being too critical of Dravid here.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now