The Outsider Posted January 14, 2012 Posted January 14, 2012 Can he get to 1000? 907 = International centuries + International wickets + International catches.
Ultimate_Game Posted January 14, 2012 Posted January 14, 2012 Probably will take couple of years to get there. Now if you consider IPL as well it could be different :P
1983-2011 Posted January 14, 2012 Posted January 14, 2012 but would that be better than 100 intentional tons:winky:
Clarke Posted January 14, 2012 Posted January 14, 2012 How on earth did you notice such a stat ? The closest i've heard is x thousand runs & y hundred wickets for all rounders.
Ultimate_Game Posted January 14, 2012 Posted January 14, 2012 How on earth did you notice such a stat ? The closest i've heard is x thousand runs & y hundred wickets for all rounders. Better to mine statsguru for such nuggets than watch Indians capitulate without a fight
shinchan Posted January 14, 2012 Posted January 14, 2012 Major landmark :omg: :facepalm::facepalm::facepalm:
Needforspeed Posted January 14, 2012 Posted January 14, 2012 Runs and Wickets are fine...but catches? Seems like a forced bit of stats. Doesn't gell.
Singham Posted January 14, 2012 Posted January 14, 2012 What an important stat when our boys are struggling at 85/4..:hatsoff:
f.b.m Posted January 14, 2012 Posted January 14, 2012 Thats coz Murali is way ahead on those... probably.
Sachinism Posted January 14, 2012 Posted January 14, 2012 You've missed out run outs effected. Must be closer now..
Ultimate_Game Posted January 14, 2012 Posted January 14, 2012 :hysterical::hysterical: Add balls faced and bowled we have the greatest aal raoundar eva B-> Actually that statement is not that far off. Kallis is definitely one of the very best all-rounders to play the game and his stats are quite favorable to other ATG all-rounders.
SachDan Posted January 14, 2012 Posted January 14, 2012 Can he get to 1000? 907 = International centuries + International wickets + International catches. Thats coz Murali is way ahead on those... probably. :hatsoff: 1536 = International wickets + International catches Kallis, who?
f.b.m Posted January 14, 2012 Posted January 14, 2012 [srs] Thats the first thing that came onto my mind when this whole 100th 100 hype was started a few years ago. No one noticed two guys had taken 1000 intl. wickets..[/srs] One of them retired immediately after he got to that landmark.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now