Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Last IPL he looked almost unplayable.This year is he looking ordinary and went for 5 sixes. Is the magic over?
Just one-off game. He is hard to hit. He did get his length wrong in that over. Gayle is a such batsman can bamboozle any bowler. The most brutal hitter of the ball ever to have played cricket, IMHO and remember he is playing with groin injury.
Posted
Just one-off game. He is hard to hit. He did get his length wrong in that over. Gayle is a such batsman can bamboozle any bowler. The most brutal hitter of the ball ever to have played cricket' date=' IMHO and remember he is playing with groin injury.[/quote'] can't say about groing injury but if injury is affecting his performence then he should rest.He does not have good domestic record for claim in Indian ODI side.If he keep playing like this then his chance of selecting is quite weak
Posted
Just one-off game. He is hard to hit. He did get his length wrong in that over. Gayle is a such batsman can bamboozle any bowler. The most brutal hitter of the ball ever to have played cricket' date=' IMHO and remember he is playing with groin injury.[/quote'] who is playing with groin injury? Gayle ? or Rahul?
Posted
can't say about groing injury but if injury is affecting his performence then he should rest.He does not have good domestic record for claim in Indian ODI side.If he keep playing like this then his chance of selecting is quite weak
The injury is to Gayle not Sharma. It was just bad over for Sharma. He still has very good IPL if you exclude that over. Rahul Sharma is a must in T20 team, IMO.
Posted
Is Stuart Broad a bad bowler?:hmmm:
Struat Broad is not a bad bowler but unlike Rahul he did not come through some T20 league.Rahul 's case was discussed several times on ICF that despite being not so good domestic first class record he was selected solely on the basis of IPL performence
Posted
Struat Broad is not a bad bowler but unlike Rahul he did not come through some T20 league.Rahul 's case was discussed several times on ICF that despite being not so good domestic first class record he was selected solely on the basis of IPL performence
But You cant discard him based on one poor over.:two_thumbs_up:
Posted
OK Ok lets see what he do in remaining matches
He has already played an important role in PWI's wins, against MI, defending a low score, he clean bowled Pollard.
Posted

Rahul Sharma relies on variations and he would be effective against batsmen who have not faced him before. But as he continues to play more cricket, batsmen will get used to him and that's when he has to evolve and come up with new tricks to deceive the batsmen. His accuracy will come in handy but that wont be good enough on flat tracks where there wont be any turn or bounce. Mendis was deadly against all teams when he started out. But after he got sorted out, he became useless and was chucked out of the team. Ashwin also relies on variations and he was good against most teams in IPL even when bowling in power plays. Now he doesnt look that convincing anymore, especially against Aussies in the recent CB series. So it remains to be seen if Rahul Sharma will be effective as batsmen play him more often and get used to picking him.

Posted

People under-estimate his flippers. They think it is a long hop and ball ends up hurrying on to them. This is where Ashwin's struggles. His quicker ones turn out to be slow long hops. He is unable to generate pace like Ajmal does. Gayle simply muscled him today. Not many can do that against him. When Gayle is in charge your best option is to drastically slow down the pace not bowl faster or toss up at normal pace.

Posted

Rahul Sharma is the real deal. He is accurate, spins, bowls the faster one. One criticism I have of his bowling is that he doesn't turn it much. Wonder why they all don't just copy Warne.

Posted
People under-estimate his flippers. They think it is a long hop and ball ends up hurrying on to them. This is where Ashwin's struggles. His quicker ones turn out to be slow long hops. He is unable to generate pace like Ajmal does. Gayle simply muscled him today. Not many can do that against him. When Gayle is in charge your best option is to drastically slow down the pace not bowl faster or toss up at normal pace.
Also he could not hit right length in that over, bowled too full or too short. His length is good length to just short of god length, that is where he gets extra bounce.
Posted
Rahul Sharma is the real deal. He is accurate' date=' spins, bowls the faster one. One criticism I have of his bowling is that he doesn't turn it much. Wonder why they all don't just copy Warne.[/quote'] It is not easy to copy Warne. Look at Steve Smith, Bryace Mcgain. They all try to copy Warne, they can only copy the action, not the spin. Moreover, Rahul is a tall spinner, he can never be like Warne. Height is a disadvantage here as he cannot give flight. He is good the way he is bowling. I would like him to make his googly more effective, like Chawla.
Posted

Gayle has this capability of hitting any ball (doesn't matter the line & length) out of the park, when he gets going..Ashwin tackled him successfully in last IPL. His weakness is against an away going ball. Rahul needs to use few googly deliveries..Gayle could've skied up one..With the spin, his shots are brutal..

Posted
Gayle has this capability of hitting any ball (doesn't matter the line & length) out of the park' date=' when he gets going..Ashwin tackled him successfully in last IPL. His weakness is against an away going ball. Rahul needs to use few googly deliveries..Gayle could've skied up one..With the spin, his shots are brutal..[/quote'] He did mistime his first ball. . No timing, no proper connection. Still went for 6.
×
×
  • Create New...