Haarkarjeetgaye Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 Dude! You said it was "derogatory". I asked "How". So' date=' you should tell me what you though "chaddis" refers to.[/quote'] he ties Chaddi to hindus. if you think it is still not derogatory, well this site has gone to some new lows
Detonator Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 Chaddis acting as if India is baap ki jaageer. what does chaddi refer to here? don't question seculars here. They will issue a fatwa on you.
Haarkarjeetgaye Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 don't question seculars here. They will issue a fatwa on you. Let them. It is my duty to question. Lets see how mods act on this
FischerTal Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 Let them. It is my duty to question. Lets see how mods act on this ganran is a mod himself :cantstop:
Detonator Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 Nope this is specifically for right wing Hindu chaddis. The idea that a Muslim in India has to be grateful to the Indian majority for not treating them the way Pakistan has treated its minorities is ridiculous, given that these people are actually using Pakistan as a benchmark for something related to basic human rights, This is the thought process behind demanding patriotism from Muslims by singing the national song and having to wear their Indianness on their sleeves. Well, indian jihadi terrorists don't need to be patriots. General public would be happy happy if they stop bombing their own countrymen for fun.
Haarkarjeetgaye Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 ganran is a mod himself :cantstop: :hysterical::hysterical: They need a change badly :--D
ganeshran Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 what is Hindu chaddis? thats derogatory to Hinduism. Mods - please action. I have no issues in making moderation stricter for all religious criticism after consulting with other mods, but that has to be applied to all religions uniformly. So next time a slanted criticism of muslim right wingers (Owaisi, Azam Khan) is made, that can be construed to be derogatory to muslims too, and the posts deleted. Fair enough?
Number Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 Nope this is specifically for right wing Hindu chaddis. In not doing this, and I’m surprised he didn’t because he should know a thing or two about Indian public opinion, Shahrukh Khan opened himself to an attack which goes in this fashion: “Aren’t you grateful, are you not satisfied, that we gave you — you Muslim! — such fame, such success? You didn’t whine about this then, did you? Now, the Pakistanis are lecturing us because of your remarks. You should be ashamed.” Does Hindu chaddis opinion equate to Indian public opinion ?
Crookbond Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 he ties Chaddi to hindus. if you think it is still not derogatory' date=' well this site has gone to some new lows[/quote'] I always thought it was used for RSS due to the khaki uniform. It has been spoken about umpteen times on ICF. Right Wing Hindus are called chaddis doesn't mean all Hindus are chaddis. That's the way I look at it. Meanwhile, Detonator has just equated Indian Muslims with jihadis. Any comments on that part or did it even catch your eye? If it did, any reason to be silent on the that topic?
diga Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 Nope this is specifically for right wing Hindu chaddis. The idea that a Muslim in India has to be grateful to the Indian majority for not treating them the way Pakistan has treated its minorities is ridiculous, given that these people are actually using Pakistan as a benchmark for something related to basic human rights, This is the thought process behind demanding patriotism from Muslims by singing the national song and having to wear their Indianness on their sleeves. Show some consistency in your usage of the word - chaddis.. once you say it can represent all fundamentalists & now for only radical Hindus.
Haarkarjeetgaye Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 I have no issues in making moderation stricter for all religious criticism after consulting with other mods, but that has to be applied to all religions uniformly. So next time a slanted criticism of muslim right wingers (Owaisi, Azam Khan) is made, that can be construed to be derogatory to muslims too, and the posts deleted. absolutely. please do it. raise it and do it. Like I did. but please not only for Muslims. Do it for Sikhs, jains, buddhists, christians, jats, parsis everybody. No bias.
Crookbond Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 Well' date=' [b']indian jihadi terrorists don't need to be patriots. General public would be happy happy if they stop bombing their own countrymen for fun. I have no issues in making moderation stricter for all religious criticism after consulting with other mods, but that has to be applied to all religions uniformly. So next time a slanted criticism of muslim right wingers (Owaisi, Azam Khan) is made, that can be construed to be derogatory to muslims too, and the posts deleted. Fair enough? Well, we have on example in this thread itself.
Crookbond Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 absolutely. please do it. raise it and do it. Like I did. but please not only for Muslims. Do it for Sikhs, jains, buddhists, christians, jats, parsis everybody. No bias. :two_thumbs_up: Awesome! I am all game for more civil discourse without name calling. Thanks for the consistency. :icflove:
Haarkarjeetgaye Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 I always thought it was used for RSS due to the khaki uniform. It has been spoken about umpteen times on ICF. Right Wing Hindus are called chaddis doesn't mean all Hindus are chaddis. That's the way I look at it. Meanwhile, Detonator has just equated Indian Muslims with jihadis. Any comments on that part or did it even catch your eye? If it did, any reason to be silent on the that topic? I dont know wht is the word Jihad, so I just cannot comment. Upto you guys. I am not as old as you guys are on ICF. this has become a derogatory website
FischerTal Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 Show some consistency in your usage of the word - chaddis.. once you say it can represent all fundamentalists & now for only radical Hindus. he will say muslim chaddis in future to be secular :two_thumbs_up:, but it wont make any sense since the origin of that word for the lefties comes from the RSS uniform :giggle:
Detonator Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 Well' date=' we have on example in this thread itself.[/quote'] Learn English :winky:
diga Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 he will say muslim chaddis in future to be secular :two_thumbs_up:, but it wont make any sense since the origin of that word for the lefties comes from the RSS uniform :giggle: how about half d-icks? will that hold
avicric Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 If you can call any person underwear and don't consider it to be derogatory then the person can call you a pus$y or a cu*t,and we will have mud slinging.
ganeshran Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 absolutely. please do it. raise it and do it. Like I did. but please not only for Muslims. Do it for Sikhs, jains, buddhists, christians, jats, parsis everybody. No bias. :two_thumbs_up: Awesome! I am all game for more civil discourse without name calling. Thanks for the consistency. :icflove: If all regular posters on CC and politics agree, then I'll put it to other mods for discussion. Just keep in mind that next time you want to criticize the idiotic comments/speeches of Azam Khan or Owaisi that will be subject to the same level of moderation, because apparently criticizing the right wingers is now derogatory to the entire religion
Recommended Posts