Jump to content

India v New Zealand, Test series performance card


Recommended Posts

Posted
Kohli, Dhoni, Ashwin - 10 Pujara - 9 Ojha - 8 ZAK, Sehwag - 5 Raina - 4 SRT, Gambo, Yadav - 2
Yadav took 5 wickets, Zak took 3. Both 4 IMO. Ojha too deserves 9.
Posted
Yadav took 5 wickets, Zak took 3. Both 4 IMO. Ojha too deserves 9.
yes ojha 9 too. zak bowled better than yadav. was a bit unlucky. had a dropped chance, an lbw missed. but not up to his usual standards. good thing is unlike other seniors he still looks good and he had a relatively good oz tour (avg 31) when others were getting slaughtered.
Posted

Pujara against spin Is it going to be a problem?i have not seen him play in domestic cricket but Jeetan patel is an ordinary bowler and he should not have any difficulties against him.

Posted
Kohli, Dhoni, Ashwin - 10 Pujara - 9 Ojha - 8 ZAK, Sehwag - 5 Raina - 4 SRT, Gambo, Yadav - 2
Ojha 8 .. Great ... guy picks up 13 wickets n two test matches and gets 8 .. Batsman Pujara scores in 1 test and fails in other and gets 9. :clap:
Posted
yes ojha 9 too. zak bowled better than yadav. was a bit unlucky. had a dropped chance, an lbw missed. but not up to his usual standards. good thing is unlike other seniors he still looks good and he had a relatively good oz tour (avg 31) when others were getting slaughtered.
:two_thumbs_up:
Posted

I have two rates for Indian players. Performer and Non-Performer Sehwag, Kohli, Pujara, Ojha, Ashwin, Dhoni -10 Gambhir, Zaheer, Yadav, Sachin, Raina- 0

Posted
Put Sehwag in the 2nd category.
As much as we blame him he averaged 40+. And conditions weren't too difficult but weren't too easy either for his batting. So I think in performer non-performer ranking he'll be able to make it among performers.
Posted

Trust me this is a one off. He is more than just a good player of spin. And his recent exploits for India A during the tour of WI on rank turners should also provide good evidence of his ability against spin.

Posted
As much as we blame him he averaged 40+. And conditions weren't too difficult but weren't too easy either for his batting. So I think in performer non-performer ranking he'll be able to make it among performers.
But his inability to score a big innings and throwing his wkt away after being set means that he's closer to the 2nd category than the 1st.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...