Rahul Dravid vs Inzamam (ODIs)

[master22]

inzy avgs 36 away compared to dravid's 41. but inzy was a monster in pakistani/middle eastern pitches.

I dont think away stats in ODI's mean much.Even Ganguly had an away avg of just 36.

[deathmonger]

some more fun ganguly - 65% wkts in won matches more than akram,akhtar etc. ganguly - what a phaaast bowler irfan pathan - 66 % wkts in won matches again more than akram akhtar etc :hysterical:

[deathmonger]

at least 4000 runs in wins was the filter i used.

well i used a different filter :giggle: you guys use filters to your own advantage for useless stats, i changed the filter. and even going by your 4000 runs filter yuvraj comes out as better. oh wait actually he is better. he doesn't disappear in wc.

[deathmonger]

I dont think away stats in ODI's mean much.Even Ganguly had an away avg of just 36.

it's an overall away avg. that away avg by inzy also includes india where he avgs 60+. but in sa, nz, oz, eng he avgs 20 something whereas ganguly does not. ganguly is consistently decent everywhere whereas inzy is good in india/pakistan/sharjah and crap outside.

[velu]

at least 4000 runs in wins was the filter i used.

still that stat is useless dude.. i bet lara has scores less % of runs in their runs than inzi

[Sooda]

On a side note If one were to select a Indo Pak dream team both would feature at 4 and 5 Id say, would make for some deft middle overs accumulation

[panther]

still that stat is useless dude.. i bet lara has scores less % of runs in their runs than inzi

same

[deathmonger]

still that stat is useless dude.. i bet lara has scores less % of runs in their runs than inzi

using that stat yuvi is better than inzi. although by the end of his career yuvi will be rated higher than inzy. shows up at world cups. 2003: 34.28 2007: 45.33 2011: 90.50

[panther]

some more fun ganguly - 65% wkts in won matches more than akram,akhtar etc. ganguly - what a phaaast bowler irfan pathan - 66 % wkts in won matches again more than akram akhtar etc :hysterical:

this stat only works for batsman separates those who played for stats and those who were match winners.

[panther]

inzi> yuvi

[deathmonger]

oh and you know who is better than inzy with the 4000 run filter? a man with 70% runs in wins (which is obv as whenever he scores big there is no chance of losing) panther's favourite player

[panther]

batsman of 2000 onwards I will take away 5% for the bowlers they faced and pitches getting flatter. batsman of 80s and 90s i would add 5%. batsman from 2007 onwards i would take away 10%.

[deathmonger]

batsman of 2000 onwards I will take away 5% for the bowlers they faced and pitches getting flatter. batsman of 80s and 90s i would add 5%.

lol changing stats on the fly. if this famous runs in winning percentage criteria is used you know who is a better test batsman than younis khan? both him and younis play in the 2000 isn't it?

[deathmonger]

batsman of 2000 onwards I will take away 5% for the bowlers they faced and pitches getting flatter. batsman of 80s and 90s i would add 5%. batsman from 2007 onwards i would take away 10%.

same thing should be down for bowlers. akhtar,wasim get penalties. pathan who has better wkt win % gets benefit and gets more better.

[SLICKR392]

Dravid any day because he kept wickets aswell and was consistent with his runs. By the end of his career he was a good finisher.

[panther]

same thing should be down for bowlers. akhtar,wasim get penalties. pathan who has better wkt win % gets benefit and gets more better.

better batsman in there era so it equals flatter pitches in this era.

[deathmonger]

inzi> yuvi

but but according to your system of 4000 runs minimum most runs scored in wins percentage blah blah blah... arbitrary system yuvi beats inzy.

[panther]

lol changing stats on the fly. if this famous runs in winning percentage criteria is used you know who is a better test batsman than younis khan? both him and younis play in the 2000 isn't it?

needs at least 2000 runs in wins and let there career finish first.

[deathmonger]

better batsman in there era so it equals flatter pitches in this era.

how so better batsmen in their era? all the 50 avging behemoths are in this era.

[panther]

but but according to your system of 4000 runs minimum most runs scored in wins percentage blah blah blah... arbitrary system yuvi beats inzy.

take away 7.5% from yuvi add 2.5% to inzi.