Rahul Dravid vs Inzamam (ODIs)

[carnish]

in odis if two spinners then kumble else lone spinner then saqi.

But Pakistanis play ODIs with 4 spinners these days :idunno:

[deathmonger]

But Pakistanis play ODIs with 4 spinners these days :idunno:

yeah :cantstop: but i think he is talking all time. if all time it will be wasim/waqar/saqi/shoaib/inzy + dhoni/srt/ganguly/dravid/yuvraj + one of kohli/gambhir/sehwag kapil/imran may play if all rounder required

[carnish]

My Indo-Pak Dream XI: Sachin Ganguly Dravid Inzy Abbas Yuvraj Dhoni Wasim Kapil Saqlain Kumble

[JaFanatic]

my indo-pak dream XI ganguly© sachin kohli dravid inzamam yuvraj dhoni wasim aameer saqlain akthar

[velu]

[deathmonger]

my indo-pak dream XI ganguly© sachin kohli dravid inzamam yuvraj dhoni wasim aameer:hysterical: saqlain akthar

[deathmonger]

waiting for a pakistani to refute then i'll start again.

[Old guy]

deathmonger damn u pawned the troll on every stat

[panther]

they are in mine.

well no need to continue the discussion than

[deathmonger]

well no need to continue the discussion than

so you admit dravid better than inzy. good.

[panther]

so you admit dravid better than inzy. good.

no

[deathmonger]

no

but i used your own algorithm to prove it.

[panther]

but i used your own algorithm to prove it.

no you didn't

[deathmonger]

no you didn't

Give me a detailed analysis of you algorithm mentioning all the specifics. And then correlate Inzy and Dravid's stats using that framework with a case by case analysis of all playing conditions and also include World Cup matches in your arguments. Make detailed points and write a huge analysis. Instead of trolling let us have a proper healthy debate. Write a huge post using whatever criteria you want. Just explain each point clearly. I'll refute/agree with each point one by one this way. So go on, take your best shot.

[panther]

Give me a detailed analysis of you algorithm mentioning all the specifics. And then correlate Inzy and Dravid's stats using that framework with a case by case analysis of all playing conditions and also include World Cup matches in your arguments. Make detailed points and write a huge analysis. Instead of trolling let us have a proper healthy debate. Write a huge post using whatever criteria you want. Just explain each point clearly. I'll refute/agree with each point one by one this way. So go on, take your best shot.

inzi % of runs in won games is 10% higher than dravids. his batting average is higher also, not that it really matters 1 run between them. inzi played about half of his career in the 90s so add on 2.5% to his % of runs in wins taking him to 65.5%. dravid played most of his cricket in 2000s so take away 3% from his % of runs in wins taking dravid to 50%. minimum criteria at least 4000 runs in wins in odi. world cup inzi 1 dravid 0, not that it matters.

[deathmonger]

inzi % of runs in won games is 10% higher than dravids. his batting average is higher also, not that it really matters 1 run between them. inzi played about half of his career in the 90s so add on 2.5% to his % of runs in wins taking him to 65.5%. dravid played most of his cricket in 2000s so take away 3% from his % of runs in wins taking dravid to 50%. minimum criteria at least 4000 runs in wins in odi.

sehwag has 70%. if you remove 3% it becomes 67%, still higher than inzy's 65.5%.

[panther]

sehwag has 70%. if you remove 3% it becomes 67%' date=' still higher than inzy's 65.5%.[/quote'] remove 6% for sehwag.

[velu]

sehwag has 70%. if you remove 3% it becomes 67%' date=' still higher than inzy's 65.5%.[/quote'] anywya he will shift the goalpost , why to argue :hysterical::hysterical:

[deathmonger]

remove 6% for sehwag.

why? :cantstop: changing the rules every minute. in the next post I'll tell you why Dravid is better than Inzy.

[Raghav_12]

well i used a different filter :giggle: you guys use filters to your own advantage for useless stats, i changed the filter. and even going by your 4000 runs filter yuvraj comes out as better. oh wait actually he is better. he doesn't disappear in wc.

Saying that Inzamam didn't show up in worls cups is not true. In fact he had announced himself in a WC only and played major role in Pakisatan WC win of 92.