What would India have done without kohli?

[Magneto]

Not exactly. The match he scored 183 and 133 India actually won the games. When he clicks big way India goes on to win especially while chasing.

Useless wins. Both centuries scored in the wrong matches. What's the point of big centuries if your team comes 3rd out of 3 teams?

[Trichromatic]

Saurav trolling again.

[vvvslaxman]

Useless wins. Both centuries scored in the wrong matches. What's the point of big centuries if you team comes 3rd out of 3 teams?

Dude .. what wrong matches. lol there were only totaly 3 matches lol. Your point only reinforces the OP"s point. What will do without kohli.. Nothing. When he fails in a match invariably we are clueless. Whenever he gets out we lose momentum. With Raina and Yuvraj not coming on to own , with two poor openers and tuk tuk captain we rrely largely on him.

[Magneto]

Saurav trolling again.

Again? When did I stop? :idunno: No one speaks the truth nowadays anyway. :ghorkalyug:

[Magneto]

Dude .. what wrong matches. lol there were only totaly 3 matches lol. Your point only reinforces the OP"s point. What will do without kohli.. Nothing. When he fails in a match invariably we are clueless. Whenever he gets out we lose momentum. With Raina and Yuvraj not coming on to own ' date=' with two poor openers and tuk tuk captain we rrely largely on him.[/quote'] Yes. It does reinforce the point that despite Kohli we have lost everything. We would have lost without him as well. Big difference :hysterical:

[vvvslaxman]

Yes. It does reinforce the point that despite Kohli we have lost everything. We would have lost without him as well. Big difference :hysterical:

No.. despite kohli we won games.. when he fails we loses games lol.. you are contradicting yourself .

[Magneto]

No.. despite kohli we won games.. when he fails we loses games lol.. you are contradicting yourself .

We win games when Kohli doesn't play or fails :agree: When I said despite Kohli, I obviously meant Kohli's 50s or 100s. :dontknow:

[vvvslaxman]

We win games when Kohli doesn't play or fails :agree: When I said despite Kohli, I obviously meant Kohli's 50s or 100s. :dontknow:

His average has to be poor in India winning games.. .. isn't it? He averages 68 in winning matches.

[Magneto]

His average has to be poor in India winning games.. .. isn't it? He averages 68 in winning matches.

Yes. All those useless matches which we won but never reached the finals.

[vvvslaxman]

Yes. All those useless matches which we won but never reached the finals.

haha now those matches are useless matches. It wasn't useless when it was played. They were not dead game. They were high pressure must win games. One game needed high run rate.

[rkt.india]

Yes. All those useless matches which we won but never reached the finals.

At least some one scoring in useless matches. Most have not done even that. Though I would say Kohli was not convincing against Aussie fast bowlers in CB series, most of his runs were against SL.

[Magneto]

haha now those matches are useless matches. It wasn't useless when it was played. They were not dead game. They were high pressure must win games. One game needed high run rate.

Yeah I am sure, but India still came 3rd out of 3 Oh and as consolation, 3rd out of 4 Kohli couldn't take the team to the finals on either occasions. :--D

[Magneto]

At least some one scoring in useless matches. Most have not done even that. Though I would say Kohli was not convincing against Aussie fast bowlers in CB series' date=' most of his runs were against SL.[/quote'] There's no harm even if all players fail in useless matches. They're just useless matches. :dontknow:

[vvvslaxman]

Yeah I am sure, but India still came 3rd out of 3 Oh and as consolation, 3rd out of 4 Kohli couldn't take the team to the finals on either occasions. :--D

Raavanas lost to BD on purpose what to do :cantstop:

[vvvslaxman]

There's no harm even if all players fail in useless matches. They're just useless matches. :dontknow:

What a load of crap you are spitting out. The so called "useless" match was the most important match for India in the CB series. :giggle:

[Magneto]

Raavanas lost to BD on purpose what to do :cantstop:

That was quite predictable. Even the Aussies lost to SL similarly. But the point is something else entirely; Kohli has surely been a top player, but he's not yet won India a tournament or a Test match (he should have won the WI Test in India but choked).

[Magneto]

What a load of crap you are spitting out. The so called "useless" match was the most important match for India in the CB series. :giggle:

Just being logical. India only had a statistical probability after that match because Aussies and Lungans had conspired against India already. Faltu brouhaha over a useless match, making it look important. :giggle:

[vvvslaxman]

Just being logical. India only had a statistical probability after that match because Aussies and Lungans had conspired against India already. Faltu brouhaha over a useless match, making it look important. :giggle:

Actually India beat SL more than SL beat India in that. 2-1 in favor of India.

[Magneto]

Actually India beat SL more than SL beat India in that. 2-1 in favor of India.

India beating SL and Kohli bossing over SL is a regular thing. Just that it doesn't help us to qualify for the finals in any tournament . :((

[vvvslaxman]

India beating SL and Kohli bossing over SL is a regular thing. Just that it doesn't help us to qualify for the finals in any tournament . :((

you only have to match by match, not the whole tournament. Bottomline is India depends on Kohli. You are saying the same and also the OP say the same. I say the same. Just saying in different ways.