Cevno Posted January 16, 2013 Posted January 16, 2013 Also, remember a ODI was held in this stadium just 2 matches ago. So they might have left that speed gun.
vayuu1 Posted January 16, 2013 Posted January 16, 2013 Ojha is a pretty good option if you have 3 quality attacking fast bowling options anyway. Though at home we need 2 spinners. But let's not get carried away. While these fast bowlers look promising they are no Steyn and Philander yet and as we know Indian fast bowlers get injured or decline. Yes an extra good spinner is always a luxury ,but think it this way ,if u are quick in air and can also hit the deck ,plus u have the ability to reverse it and attack the stumps with fuller length ,will have more impact than say an attacking spinner.
Old guy Posted January 16, 2013 Posted January 16, 2013 who cares wbt wht pace was read in air his ball looked very quick compared to others defmuch quicker then likess of bhuvan,sandeep he is like shami...who is quicker then medium pacers but slower then aaron and yadav :p
express bowling Posted January 16, 2013 Posted January 16, 2013 People heavily criticising Sandeep in a match where he is not taking wickets are being foolish. He has obviously bowled better in matches where he has taken wickets' date=' else he wouldn't have taken wickets. Everyone has bad days.[/quote'] The fact that he has not taken any wickets today is no issue at all. The thing that Iam a bit worried about is that he is not getting much zip off the pitch. That is an absolute necessity to be a strike bowler, whether spinner or pacer. But like many are saying, he is probably injured and unable to give his best. Also, he is quite young and may improve when he is older.
rkt.india Posted January 16, 2013 Posted January 16, 2013 Yeah, but still BK was mostly bowling in the 130 to 135 range even in ODI's. Average speeds i think give a better idea of how quick a bowler is not fastest ball. Anyways, Kaul at most will clock similar to Shami at the moment because of speed guns. What Kaul will clock right now is not my concern because he will still take at least 1 season to be ready for international cricket. I am thinking in 2 years if stays fit and continues to work on strengthening, he should certainly be quicker than what he is now.
Cevno Posted January 16, 2013 Posted January 16, 2013 Aditya Tare playing one chipku innings. 15 runs of 100 balls.
Cevno Posted January 16, 2013 Posted January 16, 2013 Commentator saying Yadav and Nazir from services bowl at a brisk pace.
express bowling Posted January 16, 2013 Posted January 16, 2013 One thing is sure. We are now getting pacers who are more skilled as well as quicker than most pacers we are used to seeing. They are running in harder, putting more effort, getting more out of the deck, both bounce and cut, as well as swinging the ball.
Old guy Posted January 16, 2013 Posted January 16, 2013 yeah...its cos of good pitches and attitude of selectors of prefering quicker bowlers i dont think we ever had so many bowlers bowling this quick in ranji before
express bowling Posted January 16, 2013 Posted January 16, 2013 yeah...its cos of good pitches and attitude of selectors of prefering quicker bowlers i dont think we ever had so many bowlers bowling this quick in ranji before True.
Cevno Posted January 16, 2013 Posted January 16, 2013 Kaul gets a wicket of a no ball. Was just a no ball by a millimetre. Crucial wicket of Jackson too.
Cevno Posted January 16, 2013 Posted January 16, 2013 131, 132, 129, 131, 138, 132 this over. (Rounded speeds)
rkt.india Posted January 16, 2013 Posted January 16, 2013 S Kaul to Jackson, 1 no ball, Joy for Kaul. Then a wait. And then frustration. That's a strange decision. Outswinger, gets the edge, Harbhajan takes a sharp catch at slip. The umpires want to check if this is a no-ball. Replays show Kaul's foot has dragged over the line, but I am sure a part of it was behind when the foot landed. Called a no-ball, though. Not sure I agree :WTF:
Cevno Posted January 16, 2013 Posted January 16, 2013 Sandeep Sharma gets his first edge of the match. But didn't carry at that speed.
Cevno Posted January 16, 2013 Posted January 16, 2013 :WTF: When it fully landed it was just on the line. Was very close and could have gone either way. Razdan on TV was going on about it being a No ball for some reason. Saying it was surely one.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now