Old guy Posted December 8, 2012 Posted December 8, 2012 nice to see punjab doing well even against mumbai hope this is a result match..mumbai normally goes for first inning lead... Sent from my GT-N8000 using Tapatalk HD
Number Posted December 8, 2012 Posted December 8, 2012 Another 5-fer for Awana. Suyal is injured it seems.
Old guy Posted December 8, 2012 Posted December 8, 2012 awana is better bet then dinda but imo not a wicket taking option can he reverse old ball ? Sent from my GT-N8000 using Tapatalk HD
Number Posted December 8, 2012 Posted December 8, 2012 can he reverse old ball ? Don't really know but it's not a very high arm action so I think he can. Low arm actions are good for reverse swing.
Old guy Posted December 8, 2012 Posted December 8, 2012 Don't really know but it's not a very high arm action so I think he can. Low arm actions are good for reverse swing. i asked cos i have seen him do well when conditions are good but not when dry.. :p
MCcricket Posted December 8, 2012 Posted December 8, 2012 Mumbai Ranji Squad is pitiful, Sandhu bowls at 115 to 120 k lol, Waigankar is very mediocre, why are more talented players not picked up on merit , sides like Punjab, and other less stronger teams in the past have their priorities right and teams for Mumbai, and Gujarat are pathetic, where is the rookie fast bowler Amir, Rahil bowled very well this season leading upto Ranji why isn't he in the team.
rkt.india Posted December 8, 2012 Posted December 8, 2012 yes' date='numbers can be so decieving[/quote'] Our first class cricket is deceiving, rarely give a right idea about a player.
MCcricket Posted December 8, 2012 Posted December 8, 2012 Our first class cricket is deceiving' date=' rarely give a right idea about a player.[/quote'] Ashwin to me is a more proper test batsmen then Yuvi, seeing his batting average you wouldn't say he is better then Badrinath who is useless, stats are deceiving, for bowlers it is turn, pace as primary factors, for batters temperament and time and ease to play fast and spin bowling, clearly some have it some don't. There might be quite a few Ashwin's out there batters who might be averaging around 35 but have the game to be successful test batters , more then our domestic flat track bullies same for fast bowlers and spinners, any team doing well pick up players based on their potential and groom them.
Lord Posted December 8, 2012 Posted December 8, 2012 Our first class cricket is deceiving' date=' rarely give a right idea about a player.[/quote'] yes,n to make matters worse,selectors often just rely on numbers
Trundler27 Posted December 8, 2012 Posted December 8, 2012 Mumbai Ranji Squad is pitiful' date=' Sandhu bowls at 115 to 120 k lol, Waigankar is very mediocre, why are more talented players not picked up on merit , sides like Punjab, and other less stronger teams in the past have their priorities right and teams for Mumbai, and Gujarat are pathetic, where is the rookie fast bowler Amir, Rahil bowled very well this season leading upto Ranji why isn't he in the team.[/quote'] Mumbai and Delhi are the hot beds of corruption in cricket. Hence plz do not expect any 'genuine' talent to emerge from these centres any more. It's impossible to believe that these 2 teams can't field international class ranji sides like a new south wales but it is highly unlikely due to the politics
Magneto Posted December 8, 2012 Posted December 8, 2012 Mumbai Ranji Squad is pitiful' date=' Sandhu bowls at 115 to 120 k lol, Waigankar is very mediocre, why are more talented players not picked up on merit , sides like Punjab, and other less stronger teams in the past have their priorities right and teams for Mumbai, and Gujarat are pathetic, where is the rookie fast bowler Amir, Rahil bowled very well this season leading upto Ranji why isn't he in the team.[/quote'] Waingankar replaced Agarkar as he was injured. He trundles but gets a bit of movement. Agarkar, Kulkarni, Salvi is a decent attack. In terms of spinners, Ankeet Chavan may shape up as a decent bowler after this season. Got a fiver against Bengal, and had two-three catches dropped. Had catches dropped off him today as well. Mumbai is one of the worst fielding sides in Ranji and their fielders hardly ever care to chase a ball that's running towards the boundary.
Magneto Posted December 8, 2012 Posted December 8, 2012 yes' date='n to make matters worse,selectors often just rely on numbers[/quote'] National selectors do not JUST rely on numbers. Numbers help pushing through a case because they are finally accountable to a few people. If you are selecting a national team, you'll have to show some numbers eventually to state why you want someone in the team.
Magneto Posted December 8, 2012 Posted December 8, 2012 awana is better bet then dinda but imo not a wicket taking option can he reverse old ball ? Sent from my GT-N8000 using Tapatalk HD No evidence to say that Awana is a better bet than Dinda. The guy on the bench always looks like a better prospect hypothetically. Both Awana and Dinda played against England in the tour game, and Dinda got Cook and Compton and Awana got none. Awana was underbowled though, and did bowl a decent last spell.
Old guy Posted December 8, 2012 Posted December 8, 2012 No evidence to say that Awana is a better bet than Dinda. The guy on the bench always looks like a better prospect hypothetically. Both Awana and Dinda played against England in the tour game' date=' and Dinda got Cook and Compton and Awana got none. Awana was underbowled though, and did bowl a decent last spell.[/quote'] seen him bowl..looks like a decent bowler.. dinda is kangaroo..
Magneto Posted December 8, 2012 Posted December 8, 2012 seen him bowl..looks like a decent bowler.. dinda is kangaroo.. Dinda is a kangaroo and Awana maybe a roadrunner. So?
Old guy Posted December 8, 2012 Posted December 8, 2012 Dinda is a kangaroo and Awana maybe a roadrunner. So? i have never seen dinda itch kt up and swing the bowl he does swing kt when conditions are good but always bit short ..imo international batsmen will play him easily on the other hand i have seen awana swing ball both ways..i just feel he has better chance to get people out.
Magneto Posted December 8, 2012 Posted December 8, 2012 i have never seen dinda itch kt up and swing the bowl he does swing kt when conditions are good but always bit short ..imo international batsmen will play him easily on the other hand i have seen awana swing ball both ways..i just feel he has better chance to get people out. They can both take 5-fers and demolish Ranji sides on their day. That's it. Neither will be exceptional against an international team probably. On Indian pitches, all of them will more or less produce the same result.
Old guy Posted December 8, 2012 Posted December 8, 2012 They can both take 5-fers and demolish Ranji sides on their day. That's it. Neither will be exceptional against an international team probably. On Indian pitches, all of them will more or less produce the same result. thts wht im saying they might perform similarly at ranji but i feel awana has more class to succeed at higher level...thts just my opinion..im probably wrong lol:cantstop:
namasteji1 Posted December 8, 2012 Posted December 8, 2012 ^^Well you never know unless you try them for 3-4 test matches atleast.
Old guy Posted December 8, 2012 Posted December 8, 2012 ^^Well you never know unless you try them for 3-4 test matches atleast. he is performing too did well last season and is doing fine now i think he will be more suited to odis then tests...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now