Sooda Posted November 8, 2012 Posted November 8, 2012 I went to the cinema yesterday to watch Skyfall, only to find that queues were running beyond the doors for the showing we wanted to go for and we would have got crappy seats. Any later showings would have been too late so we watched Argo instead. Very good film! Great story- impossible to believe it really happened-well acted with a really tense finale ( a highly dramatised one it seems) and funny too in parts Apparently- and expectedly I guess for a hollywood thriller like this inspired by real events- there are historical inaccuracies. Outlined in the article below, a very interesting read... Needless to say this is best read after watching the film as it contains spoilers.... http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2012/10/12/argo_true_story_the_facts_and_fiction_behind_the_ben_affleck_movie.html Argo, the new movie from actor-director Ben Affleck, has mostly been getting ravesÃÊncluding a qualified but fairly strong endorsement from SlateÃÔ own Dana Stevens, who calls it Å rollicking yarn and ÅÆasily the most cohesive and technically accomplished of AffleckÃÔ three films so far. But several reviews have also noted just how far the movie departs in certain respects from the historical record. In the movieÃÔ dramatic climax, Stevens writes, the ÅÃroadly accurate retelling of real events gives way to ÅÔome fairly whopping dramatic license. Similarly, New Yorker critic Anthony LaneÃØho also enjoyed the filmÃÇound it a ÅÃit rich that the movie pokes so much fun at Å©ollywood deceitfulness only to end ÅØith an expert helping of white lies. Former Slate film critic David Edelstein goes even further: NPR headlined his review Å¢rgo: Too Good To Be True, Because It IsnÃÕ. So just how accurate is Argo? And what are the white lies and dramatic whoppers the movie indulges in? WeÃ×e tried to break it all down below. While it seems odd to offer a spoiler alert for a movie based on historical events, be warned that the rest of this post will discuss the movie in some detail. But you should also know that a lot of the most interesting details below arenÃÕ in the movie at allÃÃecause, it turns out, much of the stuff Argo leaves out is even better than what made it in. The Premise ArgoÃÔ central, nutty storylineÃÊn which the CIA establishes a fake movie production, complete with a full script and ads in Variety and The Hollywood Reporter, in order to rescue six Americans stranded in post-revolutionary IranÃÊs 100 percent true, and pretty incredible. The movie is largely based on a terrific article by Joshuah Bearman published five years ago in Wired, which you should read. (The script also draws on a memoir by Antonio Mendez, the man that Affleck plays in the film.) As Bearman explained in a chat with Gawker readers yesterday, the person who first told him about the story was an independent movie producer named David Klawans, who hoped that Bearman would report it out and write up a Ã…Ãice yarn that Ã…ÃŽight help kickstart a movie. Å´hockingly, Bearman said, ÅÊt worked. (Klawans is an executive producer of Argo.) CanadaÃÔ Involvement The most disputed aspect of the movieÃÔ version of events has to do with CanadaÃÔ role in the escape. 30 years ago, Canada received complete credit for the rescue, because the U.S. was worried about possible repercussions if CIA involvement was publicized. (They may also have wanted to maintain the plausibility of a similar ruse in future.) Argo corrects that version of eventsÃÃr, rather, overcorrects it, downplaying the actual extent of Canadian involvement, which was considerable. The Americans were housed by two Canadians: the Ambassador Ken Taylor, and a Canadian embassy employee, John Sheardown. (In the film, all of them stay with Taylor; Sheardown does not appear at all.) It was Taylor who cabled Washington to begin the escape plan in earnest, and once the plan was decided on, Canadians ÅÔcouted the airport, sent people in and out of Iran to establish random patterns and get copies of entry and exit visas, bought three sets of airline tickets, and ÅÆven coached the six in sounding Canadian. Almost none of that appears in Argo. Taylor himself has a major part, and is presented as a sympathetic and brave man who took great personal risks to save the Americans. But his actual role was even larger. He was ÅÔpying for the U.S. throughout the hostage crisis, at the request of Jimmy Carter. After some friends who attended the Argo premiere in Toronto described it to Taylor, he expressed concern ÅÕhat weÃÓe portrayed as innkeepers who are waiting to be saved by the CIA, which is a pretty fair description of what the film depicts. Affleck made a small change in response to this criticism: A postscript that contrasted TaylorÃÔ 112 citations with the absence of credit given the CIA was rewritten to praise the Argo mission as a model of international cooperation. The Escape ItÃÔ not CanadaÃÔ involvement that has gotten the goat of some critics, thoughÃÊtÃÔ the pulse-pounding trip to the airport that serves as the movieÃÔ climax. AffleckÃÔ version involves every conceivable complicationÃÆach one of them, as it happens, invented purely to make the movie more exciting. (And it works! The finale is thrilling.) In the movie, the U.S. government reverses its approval of the plan at the last minute, meaning there may be no tickets waiting for the Americans when they arrive at the airport. In fact, the plane tickets were purchased ahead of time by the Canadians. Airport security guards stop the Americans in the film, leading to a tense and terrific scene in which one of the Americans makes the risky decision to speak Farsi with the guards, a daring move that pays off hugely. Actually, though, the trip through the airport was ÅÔmooth as silk, as Mendez himself has written. Most improbably, the teams of carpet weavers that the Iranian government put to work repairing shredded documents (something they actually did!) piece together the face of one of the six Americans right as the group reaches the airport, and those carpet weavers relay the image to their higher-ups in time for armed men to chase down the departing airplane in a jeep and police cars. None of that happened. The Fake Movie Once Mendez got the go-ahead for the fake movie plan, he needed a real movie idea that his fake film company could pretend to have in production. In Argo, Mendez and the Oscar-winning makeup artist John ChambersÃÂmusingly played by his actual doppelganger, John GoodmanÃÈo through dozens of scripts with a veteran Hollywood producer played by Alan Arkin (about whom more below), and Mendez spots a movie called Argo buried in the pile. In fact, Chambers thought of a script they could use soon after Mendez told him the idea. It was called Lord of Light, after the best-selling sci-fi novel by Roger Zelazny that it was based on. The Lord of Light script was part of a wildly ambitious scheme called Science Fiction Land, which would have been the first sci-fi theme park. In order to make that dream a reality, the scriptÃÔ author, Barry Ira Geller, managed to enlist support not only from Chambers, but from Buckminster Fuller, Ray Bradbury, Paolo Soleri, and Jack KirbyÃØho made production drawings for the film. You can see one of them below. (In Argo, Mendez commissions storyboards himself, which are quite different from KirbyÃÔ drawings.) After Chambers showed Mendez the Lord of Light script, Mendez decided it needed a new name. He suggested Å¢rgo because it was part of his favorite knock-knock joke. ŸhoÃÔ there? Å¢rgo. Å¢rgo who? Å¢rgo **** yourself. This last phrase is given a different origin story in Argo and becomes a very funny running gag. Geller, by the way, still hopes to get Lord of Light made some day, and producer-director Judd Ehrlich is trying to get a documentary about Science Fiction Land off the ground. Alan ArkinÃÔ Role Ad placed in The Hollywood Reporter, left, and a story that ran in the same magazine Among the major roles, the Hollywood producer played with great relish by Alan Arkin is the only one who is essentially fictional. Which is a bit ironic, since the character is himself presented as the embodiment of Hollywood bullshit. In Argo, Chambers tells Mendez they need a big-name producer to make the movie look legit, and he knows just the guy. In fact, Chambers brought in fellow make-up man Robert Sidell, who worked on E.T. among many other movies. The January 1980 Hollywood Reporter story that announced plans for Argo was headlined ŵwo make-up artists turn to producing with sci-fi ârgo. Arkin has said he based his character partly on Jack Warner. Ben AffleckÃÔ Role Tony Mendez is, on the other hand, very much a real person, of course. But Affleck gives him a little bit of Hollywood-friendly backstory that seems to be fictional. The first time we see Mendez in Argo heÃÔ sleeping in a messy apartment all by himself; he and his wife are taking some time off, we soon learn, and itÃÔ suggested that heÃÔ lost some respect down at the Agency. Thus Affleck reinforces the feel-good quality of the story by providing a narrative of personal redemption as well: At the end, Mendez is a hero at work, and appears to reconcile with his wife and young sonÃØho, in this version, helped inspire the sci-fi movie trappings of MendezÃÔ exfiltration plan. The real Mendez had two sons and a daughter with his first wife, who died of cancer in 1986. In his memoir, The Master of Disguise: My Secret Life in the CIA, he does not describe the kind of separation and reconciling that Affleck depicts. In fact, when he left for Tehran, his wife drove him to the airport.
EnterTheVoid Posted November 8, 2012 Posted November 8, 2012 Argo is an awesome movie. Up there with the likes of Reservoir Dogs in terms of drama and suspense.
suraj Posted November 8, 2012 Posted November 8, 2012 Awesome movie but hopefully viewers realize its a much Hollywoodized version rather than accurate description of facts
BeautifulGame Posted November 8, 2012 Posted November 8, 2012 Argo is aweome much much better than Skyfall
ganeshran Posted November 8, 2012 Posted November 8, 2012 Ben Affleck is much better at direction than acting
Sooda Posted November 8, 2012 Author Posted November 8, 2012 ^ yes he is, he did not do too badly in this movie but was not a great lead. I was slightly dissapointed to find out that the best bit of the movie- the tense finale- is all bogus, and in reality once they got to the airport it was smooth sailing
suraj Posted November 8, 2012 Posted November 8, 2012 ^ yes he is, he did not do too badly in this movie but was not a great lead. I was slightly dissapointed to find out that the best bit of the movie- the tense finale- is all bogus, and in reality once they got to the airport it was smooth sailing Yeah that is a a bit of a downer
maniac Posted November 8, 2012 Posted November 8, 2012 Thanks for the article dude....Brilliant movie...Edge-of the seat stuff Waiting for the Bhatt Family to re-make this *ing Emraan Hashmi
velu Posted November 8, 2012 Posted November 8, 2012 Ben Affleck is much better at direction than acting ++1 :agree: The Town is one of my fav movies in recent times
Recommended Posts