pak troops cross LoC, kill 2 Indian jawans brutally (decapitated)

[SLICKR392]

whats the point ? :idunno:

That nuke isn't operated how you operate a bow and arrow. It's common sense that nukes "almost" have limitless range. Mind passing on that BBC video where it talked about Pak's nuke strength? Are you sure they were describing your nuke and not your archers? :hmmm:

[KeyboardWarrior]

i have to find out on youtube but its available on youtube. they were talking about nuclear bombs of pak not missiles. i just add missiles factor becoz to launch nuclear bomb u need nuke capable fighter jets , submarine, or nuke capable missiles i.e long,middle or short ranges.

[KeyboardWarrior]

i think slickr bro u have doubt on pak nuke capable strength ? :hmmm:

[Old guy]

jsut asking i dont know much about wars.. but when was the last time nuclear weapon was used? :hmmm:

[Lord]

6 am PST today morning. I farted.

:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:

[Cevno]

And you live in India despite pakistani terrorists killing mumbaikars you were happy for pakistan to tour india for a cricket series of course indian issues matters to me because in the end they still call us indians and we are proud of our roots and ethnicity.

lol same Modi was sitting and watching that match organised in Ahmedabad by GCA which he heads. :giggle: Anyway, if you think not playing Cricket will prevent 26/11 from happening again then you are quite clearly wrong.

[KeyboardWarrior]

The hijda secular army gets its chuttad handed to it by an incomparably small' date=' under resourced but motivated opponent. Well done to the Pakis.[/quote'] thanx bhai jan :icflove:

[rageaddict]

The hijda secular army gets its chuttad handed to it by an incomparably small' date=' under resourced but motivated opponent. Well done to the Pakis.[/quote'] Agree. Thank God atleast we have the numerical advantage in our favour as of now otherwise we would be licking the feet of our Superior Paki masters once again.

[CSK Fan]

Agree. Thank God atleast we have the numerical advantage in our favour as of now otherwise we would be licking the feet of our Superior Paki masters once again.

But arent Biharis the bigger threat? Why not join hand with Pak to take care of the biharis

[KeyboardWarrior]

modi was watching match in ahmadabad :omg:

[Clarke]

modi was watching match in ahmadabad :omg:

Yea, he took inspiration from a certain fuhrer watching the 1936 Olympics :haha:

[CG]

The hijda secular army gets its chuttad handed to it by an incomparably small' date=' under resourced but motivated opponent. Well done to the Pakis.[/quote'] :hmmm: Never Knew Pakistan Has a Secular Army.

[Swing_n_Speed]

jsut asking i dont know much about wars.. but when was the last time nuclear weapon was used? :hmmm:

Hiroshima and Nagasaki The US came really close again with the Cuban Missile Crisis. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuban_missile_crisis The real danger of our times though are countries developing tactical nuclear weapons.

[CG]

For all the talk by Pakistan nuclear doctrine of first use ,It still would be pakistan last option as there is no coming back from a nuclear war.

[Swing_n_Speed]

For all the talk by Pakistan nuclear doctrine of first use ' date='It still would be pakistan last option as there is no coming back from a nuclear war.[/quote'] Pakistan is more than capable of using tactical nukes inside their own territory should the Indian army advance. 'Pakistan is developing a new generation of tactical nuclear weapons (TNWs) that target not Indian cities, but Indian military formations on the battlefield. The purpose of these, as former Pakistani Ambassador to the United States Maleeha Lodhi explained in November, is ÅÕo counterbalance IndiaÃÔ move to bring conventional military offensives to a tactical level. The idea is that smaller nuclear weapons, used on Pakistani soil, would stop invading Indian forces in their tracks.' http://thediplomat.com/2013/01/02/pakistans-new-nuclear-problem/2/ Also 'Islamabad has categorically rejected the idea of "no first use" of nuclear weapons because of its concerns over Indian conventional superiority.' http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/pakistans-short-range-ballistic-missile-nasr-is-a-matter-of-concern-for-india./0/140087.html

[CG]

Pakistan is more than capable of using tactical nukes inside their own territory should the Indian army advance. 'Pakistan is developing a new generation of tactical nuclear weapons (TNWs) that target not Indian cities, but Indian military formations on the battlefield. The purpose of these, as former Pakistani Ambassador to the United States Maleeha Lodhi explained in November, is ÅÕo counterbalance IndiaÃÔ move to bring conventional military offensives to a tactical level. The idea is that smaller nuclear weapons, used on Pakistani soil, would stop invading Indian forces in their tracks.' http://thediplomat.com/2013/01/02/pakistans-new-nuclear-problem/2/ Also 'Islamabad has categorically rejected the idea of "no first use" of nuclear weapons because of its concerns over Indian conventional superiority.' http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/pakistans-short-range-ballistic-missile-nasr-is-a-matter-of-concern-for-india./0/140087.html

You got to be dumb like certain pakis to talking to nuke ur own country.:hysterical:

[KeyboardWarrior]

:hmmm: Never Knew Pakistan Has a Secular Army.

but sarchasm bhayya talking about Indian Army :((

[game_changerr]

but sarchasm bhayya talking about Indian Army :((

lol....even u didnt undstud his sarcasm,,,,he is talkin abt mon mon sing and co

[Swing_n_Speed]

You got to be dumb like certain pakis to talking to nuke ur own country.:hysterical:

clearly u dnt know what a tactical nuke means or what it's purpose is. Read first, make a fool of urself later :--D

[jairamesh]

jsut asking i dont know much about wars.. but when was the last time nuclear weapon was used? :hmmm:

In recent memory, twice, one in Eng 2011, and one in Aus 2012, both times it was the same receiptant who got nuked. Though a few survivors still carry on fighting.