rkt.india Posted February 27, 2013 Posted February 27, 2013 Prior is the best WK right now, not doubt, in both aspects. He can play as a specialist bat too he is that good a batsman.
Old guy Posted February 27, 2013 Posted February 27, 2013 Prior is the best WK right now' date=' not doubt, in both aspects. He can play as a specialist bat too he is that good a batsman.[/quote'] but u remember right even prior struggled a LOT with keeping when he came on ? people improve and till now abdv has shown no weakness and has been pretty safe even in england which is hard for seasoned wicket keepers!
rkt.india Posted February 27, 2013 Posted February 27, 2013 but u remember right even prior struggled a LOT with keeping when he came on ? people improve and till now abdv has shown no weakness and has been pretty safe even in england which is hard for seasoned wicket keepers! ABDV wont be keeping for long.
Old guy Posted February 27, 2013 Posted February 27, 2013 ABDV wont be keeping for long. well he said he will .. so currently his keeping is pretty tight and i rate him as better batsman then prior i guess its too early to compare
rkt.india Posted February 27, 2013 Posted February 27, 2013 well he said he will .. so currently his keeping is pretty tight and i rate him as better batsman then prior i guess its too early to compare He stopped it in ODIs. Once he comes to Sc and keeps for 150 overs and 600 runs in a test or two, will stop in tests too.:winky:
Old guy Posted February 27, 2013 Posted February 27, 2013 He stopped it in ODIs. Once he comes to Sc and keeps for 150 overs and 600 runs in a test or two' date=' will stop in tests too.:winky:[/quote'] :hysterical: well when he stops then prior will be best until then go abdv :cheer:
Lord Posted February 27, 2013 Posted February 27, 2013 He stopped it in ODIs. Once he comes to Sc and keeps for 150 overs and 600 runs in a test or two' date= will stop in tests too.:winky:http://www.espncricinfo.com/south-africa-v-pakistan-2013/content/squad/605647.html no he hasnt
rkt.india Posted February 27, 2013 Posted February 27, 2013 no he hasnt http://www.espncricinfo.com/south-africa-v-pakistan-2013/content/squad/605647.html Good. Because it was Kock who was doing it in the last series.
SLICKR392 Posted February 27, 2013 Posted February 27, 2013 I did read somewhere about ABDV planning to give up gloves in LOIs. :hmmm:
Lord Posted February 27, 2013 Posted February 27, 2013 Good. Because it was Kock who was doing it in the last series. yes ABDV wasnt playing even as a batsman.They rotate players in ODIs
Crookbond Posted February 28, 2013 Posted February 28, 2013 http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/player/44936.html?class=1;filter=advanced;keeper=1;orderby=default;template=results;type=batting IDK what your point is but if someone plays 14 Test matches as a WK over 10 years I wouldn't call him a WK at all. He's just someone who can keep wickets decently but is an excellent batsman.
Crookbond Posted February 28, 2013 Posted February 28, 2013 u still living in past he saved one match in australia played a blinderi n next one destroyed pak and nz all while taking up gloves What past? He fared poorly in England and had just one good innings in Australia. New Zealand and Pakistan (in South Africa) are hardly credible opponents.
Crookbond Posted February 28, 2013 Posted February 28, 2013 He has played 11 matches as a WK, I don't know what you are on about him faring poorly as WK. He averages 55 vs Australia He averages 40 vs England He averages 59 vs New Zealand He averages 88 vs Pakistan :facepalm: Based on 2/3 Test matches you are drawing conclusions, ridiculous!
Old guy Posted February 28, 2013 Posted February 28, 2013 What past? He fared poorly in England and had just one good innings in Australia. New Zealand and Pakistan (in South Africa) are hardly credible opponents. one good innings? what about 2nd test match ? do not just look at stats..he after faf wa the biggest reason that game was draw and in england he got few starts but threw it away and in many innings did not even get chance to bat properly ..also his batting is not a question anyway he is class batsman keeping wise he did better in england in his debut series as keeper then prior did when he first came onto scene (yes in his home grounds! ) prior was not best keeper anyway ..he is famous cos of his batting not keeping
Crookbond Posted February 28, 2013 Posted February 28, 2013 no he hasnt http://www.espncricinfo.com/south-africa-v-pakistan-2013/content/squad/605647.html Good. Because it was Kock who was doing it in the last series. I did read somewhere about ABDV planning to give up gloves in LOIs. :hmmm: yes ABDV wasnt playing even as a batsman.They rotate players in ODIs :wall: Total khichdi happening here! Here is what transpired - he gave up the gloves against New Zealand to concentrate on his captaincy; with De Kock taking the gloves [0]. He wasn't supposed to take the gloves for the rest of the series too. BUT, he got suspended for the next 2 games due to slow over rate in the 1st ODI [1]. Recently, Kirsten himself has said that he is unsure about ABDV as a WK in ODIs [2]. "In terms of our situation with AB, it's more exploratory," Kirsten said in a wide-ranging press conference. "We are going through a phase of exploring and understanding his keeping. We haven't closed the door on whether he will become our one-day keeper." So, neither has he given up the gloves nor has he accepted it. But, the very fact that they are thinking in that direction is a good enough indicator that he is unable to handle all three roles as the team would like. [0] http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/567358.html [1] http://www.espncricinfo.com/south-africa-v-new-zealand-2012/content/story/601487.html [2] http://www.espncricinfo.com/southafrica/content/story/602011.html
Crookbond Posted February 28, 2013 Posted February 28, 2013 one good innings? what about 2nd test match ? do not just look at stats..he after faf wa the biggest reason that game was draw and in england he got few starts but threw it away and in many innings did not even get chance to bat properly ..also his batting is not a question anyway he is class batsman keeping wise he did better in england in his debut series as keeper then prior did when he first came onto scene (yes in his home grounds! ) prior was not best keeper anyway ..he is famous cos of his batting not keeping Ok - fine. Irrespective of whatever he has done in the last 2/3 series. 10 Test matches is too small a number to qualify someone has the BEST WK batsman! He has not kept enough to allow him a nomination as yet. If he keeps for another 2-3 years with at least close to 30 Test matches we can then talk.
Old guy Posted February 28, 2013 Posted February 28, 2013 Ok - fine. Irrespective of whatever he has done in the last 2/3 series. 10 Test matches is too small a number to qualify someone has the BEST WK batsman! He has not kept enough to allow him a nomination as yet. If he keeps for another 2-3 years with at least close to 30 Test matches we can then talk. ok i can see your point here... lets give him one more season .. but let me think abt it this way ..lets not compare over all careers as it will be unfair but current wont abdv get into world 11 as keeper? (he says tht he wants to keep and doing a great job )
Crookbond Posted February 28, 2013 Posted February 28, 2013 ok i can see your point here... lets give him one more season .. but let me think abt it this way ..lets not compare over all careers as it will be unfair but current wont abdv get into world 11 as keeper? (he says tht he wants to keep and doing a great job ) I still have my doubts. The problem is that we have to define the constraints. Personally, I am not at all ready to compromise ABDV as a batsman. Given this - I will not have him keep wickets, personal opinion.
Lord Posted February 28, 2013 Posted February 28, 2013 :wall: Total khichdi happening here! Here is what transpired - he gave up the gloves against New Zealand to concentrate on his captaincy; with De Kock taking the gloves [0]. He wasn't supposed to take the gloves for the rest of the series too. BUT, he got suspended for the next 2 games due to slow over rate in the 1st ODI [1]. Recently, Kirsten himself has said that he is unsure about ABDV as a WK in ODIs [2]. So, neither has he given up the gloves nor has he accepted it. But, the very fact that they are thinking in that direction is a good enough indicator that he is unable to handle all three roles as the team would like. [0] http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/567358.html [1] http://www.espncricinfo.com/south-africa-v-new-zealand-2012/content/story/601487.html [2] http://www.espncricinfo.com/southafrica/content/story/602011.html I feel you are ignoring one of the things you often say-correlation doesnt imply causation.Yeshes thinking about leaving gloves.but how do we know its because of the load?maybe they feel hes not good enough keeper atm.Or they are exploring backup options just in case?Infact the article says it wasnt his own decision.
Lord Posted February 28, 2013 Posted February 28, 2013 I still have my doubts. The problem is that we have to define the constraints. Personally' date=' I am not at all ready to compromise ABDV as a batsman. Given this - I will not have him keep wickets, personal opinion. [/quote'] but from the little evidence so far-the batting isnt being compromised anyway
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now